Comments on: Snail Mail Spam Filter https://boiseguardian.com/2005/06/11/snail-mail-spam-filter/ A different slant on the news. Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:00:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Berry https://boiseguardian.com/2005/06/11/snail-mail-spam-filter/#comment-32 Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:00:05 +0000 https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=32#comment-32 This is not a saftey issue at all – it is an issue that the developers and city leaders who want dense infill are pushing. They want to double, triple or more the density of all the vacant lots in the city and they need the “addresses” to go with the lots.

This is just another result of the “Blueprint for Goofy Growth” developers and the City making it easier for massive infill by having more street addresses to go with the lots they want to pack row-houses, apratments and condos on.

]]> By: Bill von Tagen https://boiseguardian.com/2005/06/11/snail-mail-spam-filter/#comment-31 Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:51:34 +0000 https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=32#comment-31 Why is this an issue for emergency response in this age of the computer and internet services which provide instant addresses and directions? Dispatch has sophisticated software and I’m sure accurate directions are given to police or fire. Can anyone document a single case where someone didn’t get a paramedic or to the hospital on time because of the current address system?
Bill von Tagen

]]>