<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Residents Protest  Development	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2005/08/04/residents-protest-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2005/08/04/residents-protest-development/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2005/08/04/residents-protest-development/#comment-87</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=74#comment-87</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While eloquently written, I can hardly accept the comparison between building a dam on the Snake and building a necessary commerce route between Idaho and Salt Lake to a private housing development aimed at having houses with a good view, for more than likely quite a bit of profit.

There is plenty of available land out there for planned communities and lots of open spaces that will have less of an affect on local wildlife than the Hammer Flats development. But alas, they won’t have the view, hence the profit, the seemingly ambiguous motivation around most of Idaho’s current development and growth.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While eloquently written, I can hardly accept the comparison between building a dam on the Snake and building a necessary commerce route between Idaho and Salt Lake to a private housing development aimed at having houses with a good view, for more than likely quite a bit of profit.</p>
<p>There is plenty of available land out there for planned communities and lots of open spaces that will have less of an affect on local wildlife than the Hammer Flats development. But alas, they won’t have the view, hence the profit, the seemingly ambiguous motivation around most of Idaho’s current development and growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A Very Concerned Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2005/08/04/residents-protest-development/#comment-86</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Very Concerned Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=74#comment-86</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just a note to all those great hard working citizens working on the project to save the Plateau - - based on the reception that other neighborhoods are getting from the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission and the Boise Planning Staff - let us save you a lot of work.....they don&#039;t care about your view....and regardless of what evidence you present they will not listen or consider it. They work FOR the developers NOT the citizens. You need to understand that they are against you even before you start. Sorry to be the bearer of the bad news.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note to all those great hard working citizens working on the project to save the Plateau &#8211; &#8211; based on the reception that other neighborhoods are getting from the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission and the Boise Planning Staff &#8211; let us save you a lot of work&#8230;..they don&#8217;t care about your view&#8230;.and regardless of what evidence you present they will not listen or consider it. They work FOR the developers NOT the citizens. You need to understand that they are against you even before you start. Sorry to be the bearer of the bad news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
