<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: He Said, She Said, They Said	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2005/11/03/he-said-she-said-they-said/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2005/11/03/he-said-she-said-they-said/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: crim445		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2005/11/03/he-said-she-said-they-said/#comment-302</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crim445]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=145#comment-302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am also rather confused bout the meeting subject.  Wasn&#039;t the topic hammer flats and to discuss ways for boise city and ada county to cooperate in development?  This is all very confusing.

Ed note--Sounds like Hammer flats was just one of the topics and that was not a legal matter.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also rather confused bout the meeting subject.  Wasn&#8217;t the topic hammer flats and to discuss ways for boise city and ada county to cooperate in development?  This is all very confusing.</p>
<p>Ed note&#8211;Sounds like Hammer flats was just one of the topics and that was not a legal matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Jones		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2005/11/03/he-said-she-said-they-said/#comment-301</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=145#comment-301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is the first I have heard that the meeting involved, &quot;county emergency medical services and how to get a future bond issued passed.&quot;

My understanding in mid July was that the meeting dealt largely, but not exclusively, with issues surrounding a pending application for a large, high density real estate development, in an area of the east Boise foothills known as Hammer Flat.

As to whether or not someone is telling the truth, the Commissioners have some confessions to make.  Namely, in their response to the AG&#039;s charges they proclaim their innocence, in part, because, &quot;The subject notes (of the meeting) have not been withheld from public inspection in any way, as best reflected by the fact they are an actual attachment to plaintiff’s complaint&quot;

The trouble with the commissioner&#039;s statement is that, before filing my complaint with the Ada County prosecutors office, my requests to see minutes of the meeting were declined by several members fo the commission staff and two of the commissioners.

The claim that they are innocent of having an illegally secret meeting because, once charges were filed, they willingly provided minutes of the meeting to the investigator, is laughable.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first I have heard that the meeting involved, &#8220;county emergency medical services and how to get a future bond issued passed.&#8221;</p>
<p>My understanding in mid July was that the meeting dealt largely, but not exclusively, with issues surrounding a pending application for a large, high density real estate development, in an area of the east Boise foothills known as Hammer Flat.</p>
<p>As to whether or not someone is telling the truth, the Commissioners have some confessions to make.  Namely, in their response to the AG&#8217;s charges they proclaim their innocence, in part, because, &#8220;The subject notes (of the meeting) have not been withheld from public inspection in any way, as best reflected by the fact they are an actual attachment to plaintiff’s complaint&#8221;</p>
<p>The trouble with the commissioner&#8217;s statement is that, before filing my complaint with the Ada County prosecutors office, my requests to see minutes of the meeting were declined by several members fo the commission staff and two of the commissioners.</p>
<p>The claim that they are innocent of having an illegally secret meeting because, once charges were filed, they willingly provided minutes of the meeting to the investigator, is laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
