Comments on: Bonuses Go To Good AND Bad Workers

By: Jack

Jack — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:42:56 +0000

I worked for private industry until they laid off everyone over 40. I now work for the state of Idaho and would rather get a decent wage and decent increase each year than medical benefits I don’t use but have to help pay for just in case, eye care benefits that I don’t use but have to help pay for, dental insurance that costs more than just going to the dentist and paying for it, holidays off that I can’t afford to do anything but work at a part time job, sick leave I don’t use, vacation time I can’t afford to go anywhere so I work at a part time job, retirement plan that the average state worker uses a few years and dies, etc. Work for this right to starve state and find out.

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:20:41 +0000

Okay so they get lower wage’s.
Humbug!
They get better Medical benifits than the private sector. Eye glass and dental.
They have a better retirment program than the private sector.
They get more days off. Sick pay, Paid Holidays and vacation than most of the private sector.

By: They Deserve It

They Deserve It — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:57:01 +0000

Government employees deserve a bonus from time to time. They work extreamly hard for much lower wages then their private sector counterparts.

By: Tam

Tam — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:42:42 +0000

Ferris, while you are correct that there is no comparison…perhaps there should be, and maybe that was Guardian’s point.

Unless the City has a performance assessment tool which is used properly, I guess we’ll never know how many employees are poor performers. The notion that ignoring poor performance should reflect on the supervisor/manager/dh, has long been shunned by managers, who are more than happy to give across the board. Afterall, there is NO accountability that way.

When there is only a right way and no wrong way, you are paying managers to breathe, and that my friend is taxpayer’s dollars at work.

By: curious george

curious george — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:19:15 +0000

I think county employees already received their identical, across-the-board, non-merit-based christmas “bonuses” – they were demoted to an at-will status.

By: Tony Jones

Tony Jones — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:45:33 +0000

Compared to Ada County, whose christmas present to their employees was a kick in the butt in the form of the “At Will” designation, Boise City’s action doesn’t seem too bad.

If $50 – $200 (about 0.3 percent of their salary) buys a little motivation and a little attitude improvement for the generally low paid staff that spend much of their year absorbing the public’s wrath, it is money well spent.

By: Ferris B.

Ferris B. — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:25:25 +0000

Calm down Dave.

There is no comparison between public and private employment.

You are perpetuating the narrow minded thinking that across the board increases are bad because poor performers get them too. Just how many of the hard working City of Boise workers are poor performers?

And please don’t fall for the “taxpayer dollars” crap. The people who work for the city aren’t exactly the highest paid folks in the state and the bonuses they received are well earned.

Until someone comes forward and gives an accurate number related to how many employees got undeserved raises, this subject should just go away. Otherwise the politics of envy win.

By: Clancy

Clancy — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:55:42 +0000

Seems that bonuses are standard across the board for all levels of government-state and local. Next week the county will probably announce bonuses.

I wonder if Dave and the councilors approved bonuses for themselves as well? This must be the easiest way to get rid of extra tax collections.