<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Property Taxes Likely To Rise	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:33:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Out East Assessor		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-7006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Out East Assessor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-7006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave-I am looking to see you on the cover of Time Magazine next year as man of the year.  As one who strives on a daily basis to serve the community which has given me my livelihood, (the City of East Lansing, MI; Home of Michigan State University) I am embarrassed and ashamed that any government entity would ever conduct business with such animosity to their taxpayers.

Sometimes government employees get complacent that they are safe in their jobs and forget they are a &#039;GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE!&quot; In my unit of government our staff, regardless of the position they hold within the organization, are paid to be NICE! We practice this like a religion.

Every now and then someone has a bad day and has to be reminded of where our bread is buttered, but for the most part, we live by and practice our stated Mission, Vision and Values. I am curious if Meridian Irrigation even has a set of organizational values. They might think about developing one. Have a great Holiday, Love You.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave-I am looking to see you on the cover of Time Magazine next year as man of the year.  As one who strives on a daily basis to serve the community which has given me my livelihood, (the City of East Lansing, MI; Home of Michigan State University) I am embarrassed and ashamed that any government entity would ever conduct business with such animosity to their taxpayers.</p>
<p>Sometimes government employees get complacent that they are safe in their jobs and forget they are a &#8216;GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE!&#8221; In my unit of government our staff, regardless of the position they hold within the organization, are paid to be NICE! We practice this like a religion.</p>
<p>Every now and then someone has a bad day and has to be reminded of where our bread is buttered, but for the most part, we live by and practice our stated Mission, Vision and Values. I am curious if Meridian Irrigation even has a set of organizational values. They might think about developing one. Have a great Holiday, Love You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: eric		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-7005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-7005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rod.. the key phrase being &quot;political courage.&quot;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rod.. the key phrase being &#8220;political courage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wolke		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-7004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wolke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-7004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am at a loss on understanding the one cent
sales tax brought to us by Gov. Risch.

Raising the tax by 20% on sales, and now I receive my property tax bill with a increase of
18%.

Instead of having a fixed price on school maintance based on property tax,  the one cent tax is suppose to guarantee this construction procedure on schools.

Every one cent tax to Idaho generates 200 million to the general fund.  How did this effect my property tax?

I am guessing it did not?

What I am reading in the paper is that it affects the personal property of business and farmers.

Am I right?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am at a loss on understanding the one cent<br />
sales tax brought to us by Gov. Risch.</p>
<p>Raising the tax by 20% on sales, and now I receive my property tax bill with a increase of<br />
18%.</p>
<p>Instead of having a fixed price on school maintance based on property tax,  the one cent tax is suppose to guarantee this construction procedure on schools.</p>
<p>Every one cent tax to Idaho generates 200 million to the general fund.  How did this effect my property tax?</p>
<p>I am guessing it did not?</p>
<p>What I am reading in the paper is that it affects the personal property of business and farmers.</p>
<p>Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod in SE Boise		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-7003</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod in SE Boise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-7003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Editor, but I do think the three legged stool of income, sales, and property taxes is a bad system.  Sales tax is, IMO, not fair, nor is the property tax.  We could, given enough political courage, have an income tax system free of loopholes, social engineer schemes, and favoritism.

In other words, maybe the income tax isn&#039;t perfect, but it is far better than sales tax, flat tax, value added tax and property tax schemes.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Editor, but I do think the three legged stool of income, sales, and property taxes is a bad system.  Sales tax is, IMO, not fair, nor is the property tax.  We could, given enough political courage, have an income tax system free of loopholes, social engineer schemes, and favoritism.</p>
<p>In other words, maybe the income tax isn&#8217;t perfect, but it is far better than sales tax, flat tax, value added tax and property tax schemes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-7002</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-7002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rod, I don&#039;t have a problem with taxing on income. I don&#039;t have a problem taxing spending. However taxing based on the value of a person&#039;s home seems to me to more of a tax on debt, and as pointed out above, it&#039;s based on unrealized gains in many cases. One way to approach the problem is to determine what it costs to provide services to particular classes of property. Once that number is known, we could intelligently decide what to do next. Perhaps we supplement that number with a local sales or income tax. Perhaps we have to subsidize that number for homeowners. I don&#039;t know. But at least it would be a logical way to proceed... and it would not be based on property value--which is the cause of the inequities that we all see. I am suggesting that we quit tinkering with the edges of the problem and get at the heart of the matter. My friend does not think it&#039;s fair that her taxes went up $600 and mine stayed the same. I have to agree with her.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rod, I don&#8217;t have a problem with taxing on income. I don&#8217;t have a problem taxing spending. However taxing based on the value of a person&#8217;s home seems to me to more of a tax on debt, and as pointed out above, it&#8217;s based on unrealized gains in many cases. One way to approach the problem is to determine what it costs to provide services to particular classes of property. Once that number is known, we could intelligently decide what to do next. Perhaps we supplement that number with a local sales or income tax. Perhaps we have to subsidize that number for homeowners. I don&#8217;t know. But at least it would be a logical way to proceed&#8230; and it would not be based on property value&#8211;which is the cause of the inequities that we all see. I am suggesting that we quit tinkering with the edges of the problem and get at the heart of the matter. My friend does not think it&#8217;s fair that her taxes went up $600 and mine stayed the same. I have to agree with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod in SE Boise		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-7001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod in SE Boise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-7001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eric,

I get a separate sewer and trash bill so those are not covered now by property taxes.

We should be taxed on income, not assets (property) or spending (sales taxes).

EDITOR NOTE--I don&#039;t have the answer.  We have tax on income and it is frought with loopholes.  Should a guy with 4 kids who makes $50,000 pay the same tax as a retired guy who makes $50K from stocks?

Idaho&#039;s &quot;three legged stool of sales, income, and property tax is not a bad system.  Shifting the burden around is the problem.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>I get a separate sewer and trash bill so those are not covered now by property taxes.</p>
<p>We should be taxed on income, not assets (property) or spending (sales taxes).</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;I don&#8217;t have the answer.  We have tax on income and it is frought with loopholes.  Should a guy with 4 kids who makes $50,000 pay the same tax as a retired guy who makes $50K from stocks?</p>
<p>Idaho&#8217;s &#8220;three legged stool of sales, income, and property tax is not a bad system.  Shifting the burden around is the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: eric		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-7000</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-7000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Property tax should be used to pay only for services related to property (fire, police to some extent, sewer, garbage). Other services should be paid for through other means. The first step in the process is to determine what it costs to provide services to particular types of property. The cost is not necessarily related to property value.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Property tax should be used to pay only for services related to property (fire, police to some extent, sewer, garbage). Other services should be paid for through other means. The first step in the process is to determine what it costs to provide services to particular types of property. The cost is not necessarily related to property value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gordon		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-6999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-6999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Property Taxes Likely To Rise&quot;

Duh!

I trust you&#039;ll keep this on a save key to use as a standing headline every year or oftener. ?.
They&#039;ve risen about every year since I moved to the area 40+ years ago.
The officials&#039; explanation? Somebody built a big new house in our neighborhood, and that somehow made mine supposedly more valuable. Same house, same services, higher taxes.  Hmmm  ...

And the colonists thought taxation *without* representation was bad!



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Property Taxes Likely To Rise&#8221;</p>
<p>Duh!</p>
<p>I trust you&#8217;ll keep this on a save key to use as a standing headline every year or oftener. ?.<br />
They&#8217;ve risen about every year since I moved to the area 40+ years ago.<br />
The officials&#8217; explanation? Somebody built a big new house in our neighborhood, and that somehow made mine supposedly more valuable. Same house, same services, higher taxes.  Hmmm  &#8230;</p>
<p>And the colonists thought taxation *without* representation was bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sleuth		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-6998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sleuth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-6998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gov. Otter suggested a Prop 13 type property tax here in Idaho and the Statesman came out swinging against it, then declared it was &quot;dead on arrival&quot; at the State Legislature.

How do we make sure the legislature is DOA? We need to get rid of the people who stand in the way of important tax relief for the people of this state. To continue to RAISE property taxes at a time when the entire country is looking at the possibility of a recession is simply asking for horrible economic trouble. How many people in Idaho are going to have to lose their homes before the State Legislature wakes up and listens to the Governor? OTTER IS RIGHT -- property tax increases must be limited to protect homeowners from the voracious appetite of big government.

Prop 13 works!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Otter suggested a Prop 13 type property tax here in Idaho and the Statesman came out swinging against it, then declared it was &#8220;dead on arrival&#8221; at the State Legislature.</p>
<p>How do we make sure the legislature is DOA? We need to get rid of the people who stand in the way of important tax relief for the people of this state. To continue to RAISE property taxes at a time when the entire country is looking at the possibility of a recession is simply asking for horrible economic trouble. How many people in Idaho are going to have to lose their homes before the State Legislature wakes up and listens to the Governor? OTTER IS RIGHT &#8212; property tax increases must be limited to protect homeowners from the voracious appetite of big government.</p>
<p>Prop 13 works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod in SE Boise		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2007/12/11/property-taxes-likely-to-rise/#comment-6997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod in SE Boise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=799#comment-6997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Taxes should be collected based on income, not on the value of our assets (that may or may not have unrealized capital gains, as pointed out above by ericn1300) or our spending habits (sales tax).

In 2001 my property taxes (the amount I paid at the end of the year) went down, about $80.  In 2004 they went down again, by about $19.  And in 2006 they went down by about $660 due to the increase in the homeowner exemption from $50,000 to $75,000.  This year, 2007, they went up about $160 in spite of the increase in homeowners exemption from $75000 to $89325, probably because the valuation of my lot doubled while the valuation of the improvement (my house) decreased.  So taxes do go down, at least my individual taxes have gone down at times.  I am quite sure that the total budget of the taxing authorities has probably never gone down.

We need leadership that will follow the desires of the citizens, and not the corporate interests, and I&#039;m not just referring to local politics.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxes should be collected based on income, not on the value of our assets (that may or may not have unrealized capital gains, as pointed out above by ericn1300) or our spending habits (sales tax).</p>
<p>In 2001 my property taxes (the amount I paid at the end of the year) went down, about $80.  In 2004 they went down again, by about $19.  And in 2006 they went down by about $660 due to the increase in the homeowner exemption from $50,000 to $75,000.  This year, 2007, they went up about $160 in spite of the increase in homeowners exemption from $75000 to $89325, probably because the valuation of my lot doubled while the valuation of the improvement (my house) decreased.  So taxes do go down, at least my individual taxes have gone down at times.  I am quite sure that the total budget of the taxing authorities has probably never gone down.</p>
<p>We need leadership that will follow the desires of the citizens, and not the corporate interests, and I&#8217;m not just referring to local politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
