<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Guardian On AM 580 Tuesday	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2008/02/17/guardian-on-am-580-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2008/02/17/guardian-on-am-580-tuesday/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Don		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2008/02/17/guardian-on-am-580-tuesday/#comment-7565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=865#comment-7565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We don&#039;t mind. And be we, I mean me. Wait... Me don&#039;t mind? By me we mean I. I don&#039;t mind.

We think.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t mind. And be we, I mean me. Wait&#8230; Me don&#8217;t mind? By me we mean I. I don&#8217;t mind.</p>
<p>We think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: eric		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2008/02/17/guardian-on-am-580-tuesday/#comment-7564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/wp/?p=865#comment-7564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hate to be picky, but could we ditch the &quot;we&quot; and go for &quot;I&quot;? I know the royal or editorial &quot;we&quot; has precedent, but hey, we are in Idaho! How about a 3rd person compromise &quot;This reporter&quot;?

EDITOR NOTE--Gosh Eric, even a one man band is still a band.  I do try to avoid the &quot;I&quot; as much as possible and honestly look at the GUARDIAN as a lot more than just &quot;me.&quot;  Without &quot;us&quot; it isn&#039;t much.  I will try to do better with our pronouns for all of us.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to be picky, but could we ditch the &#8220;we&#8221; and go for &#8220;I&#8221;? I know the royal or editorial &#8220;we&#8221; has precedent, but hey, we are in Idaho! How about a 3rd person compromise &#8220;This reporter&#8221;?</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Gosh Eric, even a one man band is still a band.  I do try to avoid the &#8220;I&#8221; as much as possible and honestly look at the GUARDIAN as a lot more than just &#8220;me.&#8221;  Without &#8220;us&#8221; it isn&#8217;t much.  I will try to do better with our pronouns for all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
