<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Search On To Replace CWI Prez	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cyclops is a bunch of hot air		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyclops is a bunch of hot air]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That is not what I meant.  Because the rest of my post was deleted, there is no context to my post.  Also, I do not see the difference between my post and Cyclops calling my post stupid.  It was all in the same vein.

EDITOR NOTE--Kids!  Play nice.  You DON&#039;T me to stop the car and come back there.   You are correct about Cyclops.  I have had to put him in time out in the past for being a potty mouth.  Can&#039;t justify that his comments were heated and while obviously aimed at you he was wrong to add stupid.  I cannot do any more refereeing on this, so COMMENTS CLOSED!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not what I meant.  Because the rest of my post was deleted, there is no context to my post.  Also, I do not see the difference between my post and Cyclops calling my post stupid.  It was all in the same vein.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Kids!  Play nice.  You DON&#8217;T me to stop the car and come back there.   You are correct about Cyclops.  I have had to put him in time out in the past for being a potty mouth.  Can&#8217;t justify that his comments were heated and while obviously aimed at you he was wrong to add stupid.  I cannot do any more refereeing on this, so COMMENTS CLOSED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cyclops go for it. I for one don&#039;t trust anyone that claims the educational system isn&#039;t some where some how trying to con more money out of the Tax payers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyclops go for it. I for one don&#8217;t trust anyone that claims the educational system isn&#8217;t some where some how trying to con more money out of the Tax payers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cyclops		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some of you are absolutely nuts! 
Fees and tuition have NOTHING to do with lobbying! Geeze, no wonder we elect so many idiots to office. It is obvious some of the people voting for them are just as naive.
Do you want to see lobbying in it&#039;s purest form?? Drop by Moon&#039;s someday for breakfast or lunch. Stop by Chandlers, or one of three or four other watering holes downtown and watch the mighty state legislators conduct the people&#039;s business. &quot;There is no lobbying because there is no lobbyist&quot; Are you kidding? That is justy about the silliest thing I have ever read here! I stand corrected! That comment was not silly, it was downright STUPID!
There is no talking head, therefore there is no attempt to influence policy. My God! You can&#039;t really feel that way!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you are absolutely nuts!<br />
Fees and tuition have NOTHING to do with lobbying! Geeze, no wonder we elect so many idiots to office. It is obvious some of the people voting for them are just as naive.<br />
Do you want to see lobbying in it&#8217;s purest form?? Drop by Moon&#8217;s someday for breakfast or lunch. Stop by Chandlers, or one of three or four other watering holes downtown and watch the mighty state legislators conduct the people&#8217;s business. &#8220;There is no lobbying because there is no lobbyist&#8221; Are you kidding? That is justy about the silliest thing I have ever read here! I stand corrected! That comment was not silly, it was downright STUPID!<br />
There is no talking head, therefore there is no attempt to influence policy. My God! You can&#8217;t really feel that way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cyclops is a bunch of hot air		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12212</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyclops is a bunch of hot air]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow, I just saw this:
College of Western Idaho students won&#039;t have to pay more to go to school next year.

CWI trustees said it was not the appropriate time to raise tuition because of the recession.

College of Western Idaho fees will stay at $119 per credit hour and $1,428 per semester for 12 to 18 credits.

Boise State University has proposed a 5 percent increase in tuition for next year for a total of $2,432.per semester. The State Board of Education must still approve Boise State&#039;s request. The board does not oversee community college tuitions.
________________________________

And, for the record, CWI DOES NOT have a lobbyest.  Bill is right that there is no lobbying.  BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE A LOBBYEST.  

EDITOR NOTE--A personal attack was deleted from the rest of this comment.  We try to edit comments of a personal nature.  Lively debate is fine, but the GUARDIAN does not want comments like those found on lesser blogs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I just saw this:<br />
College of Western Idaho students won&#8217;t have to pay more to go to school next year.</p>
<p>CWI trustees said it was not the appropriate time to raise tuition because of the recession.</p>
<p>College of Western Idaho fees will stay at $119 per credit hour and $1,428 per semester for 12 to 18 credits.</p>
<p>Boise State University has proposed a 5 percent increase in tuition for next year for a total of $2,432.per semester. The State Board of Education must still approve Boise State&#8217;s request. The board does not oversee community college tuitions.<br />
________________________________</p>
<p>And, for the record, CWI DOES NOT have a lobbyest.  Bill is right that there is no lobbying.  BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE A LOBBYEST.  </p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;A personal attack was deleted from the rest of this comment.  We try to edit comments of a personal nature.  Lively debate is fine, but the GUARDIAN does not want comments like those found on lesser blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: I'm siding with Cyclops		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I'm siding with Cyclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is always humorous to see people claim their pet industry does not lobby the legislature for funding.  I have friends from Pocatello and Moscow that I don&#039;t see most of the year, but make regular use of my guest room here in Boise during the &quot;session&quot;.  They are not lobbyists.  They are simply providing information to our representatives.  They are educating them. 

But, then again, that is what lobbyists say they are doing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always humorous to see people claim their pet industry does not lobby the legislature for funding.  I have friends from Pocatello and Moscow that I don&#8217;t see most of the year, but make regular use of my guest room here in Boise during the &#8220;session&#8221;.  They are not lobbyists.  They are simply providing information to our representatives.  They are educating them. </p>
<p>But, then again, that is what lobbyists say they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cyclops		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see Bill. First post you said no one from CWI was lobbying. Now you state that they are just &quot;trying to ensure they get the same state funding as all of the other state community colleges&quot; Gee, I wonder how they would do that? Maybe by &quot;lobbying&quot; the legislature?
If your sister is one of the leading legislators in the state, by process of elimination, that would be Kate. If so, do you really believe she is in on all matters of the majority? It never ceases to amaze me how &quot;important&quot; certain state legislators think they are! This is not limited to republicans or democrats. It is simply a comment about the huge egos some have in seeking office!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see Bill. First post you said no one from CWI was lobbying. Now you state that they are just &#8220;trying to ensure they get the same state funding as all of the other state community colleges&#8221; Gee, I wonder how they would do that? Maybe by &#8220;lobbying&#8221; the legislature?<br />
If your sister is one of the leading legislators in the state, by process of elimination, that would be Kate. If so, do you really believe she is in on all matters of the majority? It never ceases to amaze me how &#8220;important&#8221; certain state legislators think they are! This is not limited to republicans or democrats. It is simply a comment about the huge egos some have in seeking office!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cyclops, once again you are wrong.  CWI is just trying to ensure they get the same state funding as all of other state community colleges.  If they get it, maybe a tax increase won&#039;t be needed.  Or, minimize the tax impact.  

Don&#039;t mislead people that CWI is out there with greedy little hands asking for anything up and beyond what is needed and can be afforded during these tough times.  My sister is a leading legislator in this state and she says you are full of it and are misleading people about CWI lobbying.  She also said she has not had one lobbyist approach her and would know if this was happening because of her position on a committee.  I think you don&#039;t understand what is being ask in terms of funding and how funding works for community colleges in this state.  It&#039;s not fair to make CWI sound sinister.  I think you are just so anti-tax, that your view is NARROW and one-sighted!  

Great post by TVCC employee. I think TVCC&#039;s success and CWI&#039;s great start shows that there is a great need for affordable higher education in the Treasure Valley.  I&#039;m not a big fan of Idaho money leaving the state right now, but can probably live with it because it gives people another option.  Competition is never a bad thing.  I do think that Caldwell would only serve itself best if it equally embraced both schools versus appearing to favor TVCC over CWI.  If both thrive, Caldwell will benefit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyclops, once again you are wrong.  CWI is just trying to ensure they get the same state funding as all of other state community colleges.  If they get it, maybe a tax increase won&#8217;t be needed.  Or, minimize the tax impact.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t mislead people that CWI is out there with greedy little hands asking for anything up and beyond what is needed and can be afforded during these tough times.  My sister is a leading legislator in this state and she says you are full of it and are misleading people about CWI lobbying.  She also said she has not had one lobbyist approach her and would know if this was happening because of her position on a committee.  I think you don&#8217;t understand what is being ask in terms of funding and how funding works for community colleges in this state.  It&#8217;s not fair to make CWI sound sinister.  I think you are just so anti-tax, that your view is NARROW and one-sighted!  </p>
<p>Great post by TVCC employee. I think TVCC&#8217;s success and CWI&#8217;s great start shows that there is a great need for affordable higher education in the Treasure Valley.  I&#8217;m not a big fan of Idaho money leaving the state right now, but can probably live with it because it gives people another option.  Competition is never a bad thing.  I do think that Caldwell would only serve itself best if it equally embraced both schools versus appearing to favor TVCC over CWI.  If both thrive, Caldwell will benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dog		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Personally, I would describe Cyclops as being mono-myopic in his point of view.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would describe Cyclops as being mono-myopic in his point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cyclops		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bill, you must not be talking to the right legislators! The upside of losing an eye is that there is an acute increase in peripheral vision. It allows you to see the &quot;outer boundaries&quot; of an issue.
The mainstream higher education entities certainly are not guiltless here. They surely do have their greedy little hands out on an ongoing basis. With regard to higher education overall, it serves to increase the employability of society and that is good. Unfortunately, many university level professors spend so much time preaching to their students how much their earning potential will be, that when they finally graduate and enter the work force they are shocked to find that their degree just gets them in the door and not a private secretary with a corner office.
It doesn&#039;t matter if it is a two year, four year, or graduate institution. If it misleads the public in order to get some &quot;pie in the sky funding&quot; it deserves no support! Oh! And for you to intimate that CWI is not currently lobbying for additional monies is either purposely misleading or increadibly naive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, you must not be talking to the right legislators! The upside of losing an eye is that there is an acute increase in peripheral vision. It allows you to see the &#8220;outer boundaries&#8221; of an issue.<br />
The mainstream higher education entities certainly are not guiltless here. They surely do have their greedy little hands out on an ongoing basis. With regard to higher education overall, it serves to increase the employability of society and that is good. Unfortunately, many university level professors spend so much time preaching to their students how much their earning potential will be, that when they finally graduate and enter the work force they are shocked to find that their degree just gets them in the door and not a private secretary with a corner office.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter if it is a two year, four year, or graduate institution. If it misleads the public in order to get some &#8220;pie in the sky funding&#8221; it deserves no support! Oh! And for you to intimate that CWI is not currently lobbying for additional monies is either purposely misleading or increadibly naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TVCC_Poster		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2009/03/16/search-on-to-replace-cwi-prez/#comment-12187</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TVCC_Poster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=2240#comment-12187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A couple comments from someone who works at TVCC.

First, the original post is generally unkind to a man, Dennis Griffin, who&#039;s given significant effort to educating students throughout the Treasure Valley for many years. When he was appointed to the presidency of CWI at the time of its creation, he was clear then that he was only interested in the position for two years, and he&#039;s been consistent since then. To pillory him for keeping his word is to criticize someone for acting honorably. My understanding is that the blog author, and many who comment, want good government and good stewards of public funds. You can disagree with how CWI was established, or whether it was needed, but lobbing brickbats at a responsible administrator who&#039;s successfully managed a startup of this magnitude makes you look mean, and uninformed.

Second, there continues to be confusion about the role of TVCC in the Treasure Valley educational scene. TVCC receives no funding from the Idaho state government, or from any taxing district in Idaho. As Paul correctly states, TVCC has been operating a branch center in Caldwell for almost six years. This operation is funded completely by the student tuition and fees - because it&#039;s located in Idaho, it also cannot be funded by Oregon taxpayer funds. This makes for an operation with a business model that looks actually more like a private college (U of Phoenix or College of Idaho) than a traditionally funded, taxpayer-supported community college.

Because Idaho colleges like BSU and CWI operate on a semester system (where classes are typically 15 weeks long), and Oregon colleges operate on a quarter system (where classes are 11 weeks long), it always makes comparing the cost per credit hard. At its simplest, a quarter credit equates to two-thirds of a semester credit.

As such, you need to multiply TVCC&#039;s credit cost by 1.3 to get a true equivalent cost. As a result, if you compare cost per credit at TVCC&#039;s Caldwell Center ($97) to the number that Bronco Bob cites for BSU ($238), then the true comparison is $122.32 to $238. Bronco Bob is in error about additional fees - TVCC incorporates all fees into a single Universal fee that is charged per-credit. Of the $97 figure I cite above, $12 of that is our universal fee.

An astute reader will note, then, that TVCC&#039;s per-credit cost when converted to its semester equivalent ($122.30) is higher than CWI&#039;s $119. This is, in essence, the difference that taxpayer funding makes. TVCC in Caldwell runs with a very lean, very efficient staffing model because we have to - we&#039;re tuition-funded. James Bond asks why TVCC would be interested in doing so, and the answer is because education is our mission, and because six years ago, partners in the Caldwell area approached us about filling a need. It made financial sense then, and it continues to do so now. TVCC has been consistent in our statement that CWI is a needed addition to the Treasure Valley. And, frankly, having gone through our own startup phase during the last six years, we can attest that what CWI has accomplished is no small feat - they&#039;re building the plane at the same time as they&#039;re flying it, and so is TVCC. 

To come back to the original point. You can certainly question political decisions, and you can make your own judgments about the affordability of providing quality education in the Treasure Valley today, but to beat up on someone who&#039;s served his community and now chooses a retirement he&#039;s earned - at best, that&#039;s uninformed, and at worst, distasteful enough that you&#039;ll find yourself ignored.

EDITOR--Poster, you are simply wrong.  I talked to Griffin, we joked about the &quot;honorary associate degree,&quot; and we took him at his word that he was in for 2 yrs. and time is up in August.  From the outset the GUARDIAN has never been against the CWI.  We posted &quot;both sides&quot; of the start up debate long before the mainstream would even touch it.  We strongly support the fact it was approved by the &quot;people.&quot;
We tried to stimulate interest in attracting candidates for the board seats --joked about getting a &quot;free weapon permit&quot; since ANY elected official in Idaho can carry.

We have NEVER questioned the integrity of Griffin.  We HAVE been critical of some institution missteps, but there were only missteps, nothing more.  Use the GUARDIAN archive and search for CWI, education, etc. and see we have been all over the board on the new school.

Here are a few posts over the years, including one from another TVCC guy:
https://boiseguardian.com/2008/06/30/can-cwi-trustees-be-trusted/

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple comments from someone who works at TVCC.</p>
<p>First, the original post is generally unkind to a man, Dennis Griffin, who&#8217;s given significant effort to educating students throughout the Treasure Valley for many years. When he was appointed to the presidency of CWI at the time of its creation, he was clear then that he was only interested in the position for two years, and he&#8217;s been consistent since then. To pillory him for keeping his word is to criticize someone for acting honorably. My understanding is that the blog author, and many who comment, want good government and good stewards of public funds. You can disagree with how CWI was established, or whether it was needed, but lobbing brickbats at a responsible administrator who&#8217;s successfully managed a startup of this magnitude makes you look mean, and uninformed.</p>
<p>Second, there continues to be confusion about the role of TVCC in the Treasure Valley educational scene. TVCC receives no funding from the Idaho state government, or from any taxing district in Idaho. As Paul correctly states, TVCC has been operating a branch center in Caldwell for almost six years. This operation is funded completely by the student tuition and fees &#8211; because it&#8217;s located in Idaho, it also cannot be funded by Oregon taxpayer funds. This makes for an operation with a business model that looks actually more like a private college (U of Phoenix or College of Idaho) than a traditionally funded, taxpayer-supported community college.</p>
<p>Because Idaho colleges like BSU and CWI operate on a semester system (where classes are typically 15 weeks long), and Oregon colleges operate on a quarter system (where classes are 11 weeks long), it always makes comparing the cost per credit hard. At its simplest, a quarter credit equates to two-thirds of a semester credit.</p>
<p>As such, you need to multiply TVCC&#8217;s credit cost by 1.3 to get a true equivalent cost. As a result, if you compare cost per credit at TVCC&#8217;s Caldwell Center ($97) to the number that Bronco Bob cites for BSU ($238), then the true comparison is $122.32 to $238. Bronco Bob is in error about additional fees &#8211; TVCC incorporates all fees into a single Universal fee that is charged per-credit. Of the $97 figure I cite above, $12 of that is our universal fee.</p>
<p>An astute reader will note, then, that TVCC&#8217;s per-credit cost when converted to its semester equivalent ($122.30) is higher than CWI&#8217;s $119. This is, in essence, the difference that taxpayer funding makes. TVCC in Caldwell runs with a very lean, very efficient staffing model because we have to &#8211; we&#8217;re tuition-funded. James Bond asks why TVCC would be interested in doing so, and the answer is because education is our mission, and because six years ago, partners in the Caldwell area approached us about filling a need. It made financial sense then, and it continues to do so now. TVCC has been consistent in our statement that CWI is a needed addition to the Treasure Valley. And, frankly, having gone through our own startup phase during the last six years, we can attest that what CWI has accomplished is no small feat &#8211; they&#8217;re building the plane at the same time as they&#8217;re flying it, and so is TVCC. </p>
<p>To come back to the original point. You can certainly question political decisions, and you can make your own judgments about the affordability of providing quality education in the Treasure Valley today, but to beat up on someone who&#8217;s served his community and now chooses a retirement he&#8217;s earned &#8211; at best, that&#8217;s uninformed, and at worst, distasteful enough that you&#8217;ll find yourself ignored.</p>
<p>EDITOR&#8211;Poster, you are simply wrong.  I talked to Griffin, we joked about the &#8220;honorary associate degree,&#8221; and we took him at his word that he was in for 2 yrs. and time is up in August.  From the outset the GUARDIAN has never been against the CWI.  We posted &#8220;both sides&#8221; of the start up debate long before the mainstream would even touch it.  We strongly support the fact it was approved by the &#8220;people.&#8221;<br />
We tried to stimulate interest in attracting candidates for the board seats &#8211;joked about getting a &#8220;free weapon permit&#8221; since ANY elected official in Idaho can carry.</p>
<p>We have NEVER questioned the integrity of Griffin.  We HAVE been critical of some institution missteps, but there were only missteps, nothing more.  Use the GUARDIAN archive and search for CWI, education, etc. and see we have been all over the board on the new school.</p>
<p>Here are a few posts over the years, including one from another TVCC guy:<br />
<a href="https://boiseguardian.com/2008/06/30/can-cwi-trustees-be-trusted/" rel="ugc">https://boiseguardian.com/2008/06/30/can-cwi-trustees-be-trusted/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
