<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Driving, Texting Don&#8217;t Mix&#8211;For Anyone!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jake		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16653</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16653</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Again a departure from reality....for you to compare a 7 1/2&quot; x 9&quot; touchscreen MDT to a cell phone requiring a 3&quot; keyboard is ridiculous.

The simple reason for MDT&#039;s is to preserve radio &quot;airtime&quot; for emergency traffic. Simple question, &quot;How many more radio channels would be required if each officer was required to get all of their information over the radio?&quot; Or, &quot;How much more money is the public willing to spend on communications?&quot;

Are MDT&#039;s a distraction to driving?...absolutely. Is it the same as someone texting?...of course not. The discussion is just another feeble attempt at questioning one; &quot;Boise City&quot; and two; public servants. :(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again a departure from reality&#8230;.for you to compare a 7 1/2&#8243; x 9&#8243; touchscreen MDT to a cell phone requiring a 3&#8243; keyboard is ridiculous.</p>
<p>The simple reason for MDT&#8217;s is to preserve radio &#8220;airtime&#8221; for emergency traffic. Simple question, &#8220;How many more radio channels would be required if each officer was required to get all of their information over the radio?&#8221; Or, &#8220;How much more money is the public willing to spend on communications?&#8221;</p>
<p>Are MDT&#8217;s a distraction to driving?&#8230;absolutely. Is it the same as someone texting?&#8230;of course not. The discussion is just another feeble attempt at questioning one; &#8220;Boise City&#8221; and two; public servants. 🙁</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gordon		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16642</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[People who text while driving should not be cited or arrested. They should be taken into protective custody and held for mental evaluation. Anyone who texts while driving must be mentally deficient in some way.

And cops can listen to a dispatcher on the radio without taking their eyes off the road. They cannot read without taking their eyes off the road.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who text while driving should not be cited or arrested. They should be taken into protective custody and held for mental evaluation. Anyone who texts while driving must be mentally deficient in some way.</p>
<p>And cops can listen to a dispatcher on the radio without taking their eyes off the road. They cannot read without taking their eyes off the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JamesBond		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesBond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My own unscientific impression is that texting is far more prevalent with females than males.  If my observations are true, then perhaps we should just ban it for them.

EDITOR NOTE--Ladies, please ignore the comment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own unscientific impression is that texting is far more prevalent with females than males.  If my observations are true, then perhaps we should just ban it for them.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Ladies, please ignore the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cyclops		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cyclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, if there is no difference between police driving and the general public, where are all the police wrecks while texting? They drive something like 70-80 thousand miles a year. One would think they would have a wreck a week if they are all texting and reading computers all the time.

EDITOR NOTE--They DO have mishaps.  Dept. policy is to report any damage to cars in excess of $25.  We don&#039;t need to saddle them with a records request, but suffice it to say, #$$%&amp; happens.   Most often it is bumping a curb-type thing or  other minor incident.  Sometimes they cross the center line...  There isn&#039;t often a conflict with other vehicles because as mentioned in  comments here, others see the big white stallion and avoid it (marked patrol car).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if there is no difference between police driving and the general public, where are all the police wrecks while texting? They drive something like 70-80 thousand miles a year. One would think they would have a wreck a week if they are all texting and reading computers all the time.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;They DO have mishaps.  Dept. policy is to report any damage to cars in excess of $25.  We don&#8217;t need to saddle them with a records request, but suffice it to say, #$$%&#038; happens.   Most often it is bumping a curb-type thing or  other minor incident.  Sometimes they cross the center line&#8230;  There isn&#8217;t often a conflict with other vehicles because as mentioned in  comments here, others see the big white stallion and avoid it (marked patrol car).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zippo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zippo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This will do what for Police, Fire, EMS?  They all use computers for info and communications while driving. I think police are the only solo drivers though.  Too bad that people have such a hard time with their priorities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will do what for Police, Fire, EMS?  They all use computers for info and communications while driving. I think police are the only solo drivers though.  Too bad that people have such a hard time with their priorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: leave me alone		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16588</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leave me alone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[watch out james bond, untamedshrew might want a law against being &quot;mesmerized&quot; while driving and for you to be &quot;punished severely...because the potential for harm is great&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watch out james bond, untamedshrew might want a law against being &#8220;mesmerized&#8221; while driving and for you to be &#8220;punished severely&#8230;because the potential for harm is great&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nemo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok, back on topic. 

I for one am in support of the ban. There has been limited research that has foused on components of driving (braking, steering, etc) and attention span times while texting and experiancing other distractions, and they are all pretty clear. Texting, carrying on a conversation, all are bad while driving. 


HOWEVER, I did run accross this interesting article....

http://www.freep.com/article/20100129/BUSINESS01/1290322/1002/Business/Barring-handheld-cell-phones-doesnt-cut-crashes-study-says

I still believe that distracted driving is bad...unfortunately some of it is unavoidable in todays world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, back on topic. </p>
<p>I for one am in support of the ban. There has been limited research that has foused on components of driving (braking, steering, etc) and attention span times while texting and experiancing other distractions, and they are all pretty clear. Texting, carrying on a conversation, all are bad while driving. </p>
<p>HOWEVER, I did run accross this interesting article&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20100129/BUSINESS01/1290322/1002/Business/Barring-handheld-cell-phones-doesnt-cut-crashes-study-says" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.freep.com/article/20100129/BUSINESS01/1290322/1002/Business/Barring-handheld-cell-phones-doesnt-cut-crashes-study-says</a></p>
<p>I still believe that distracted driving is bad&#8230;unfortunately some of it is unavoidable in todays world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kappa TA		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16585</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kappa TA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: Texting

Most cops I&#039;ve seen do park on side streets to write their reports, although I&#039;ve seen exceptions of turning on flashing lights in the middle of traffic for no known reason, confusing other motorists. In the case of paramedics, there are always two, one drives and the other writes the report. I don&#039;t think anyone, including public safety officers or politicians, should be exempted from inattentive driving laws any more than they should be exempted from drunk driving, murder,false arrest, harassment, fraud, or any other crime. NO ONE should be immune from the laws. NO ONE is any more important than anyone else. A uniform or title isn&#039;t a license to harm others. Again, as I&#039;ve written before, we need to stop engaging in &quot;hero worship&quot; and hold everyone who breaks laws accountable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Texting</p>
<p>Most cops I&#8217;ve seen do park on side streets to write their reports, although I&#8217;ve seen exceptions of turning on flashing lights in the middle of traffic for no known reason, confusing other motorists. In the case of paramedics, there are always two, one drives and the other writes the report. I don&#8217;t think anyone, including public safety officers or politicians, should be exempted from inattentive driving laws any more than they should be exempted from drunk driving, murder,false arrest, harassment, fraud, or any other crime. NO ONE should be immune from the laws. NO ONE is any more important than anyone else. A uniform or title isn&#8217;t a license to harm others. Again, as I&#8217;ve written before, we need to stop engaging in &#8220;hero worship&#8221; and hold everyone who breaks laws accountable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JamesBond		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16579</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesBond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was driving down the road the other day and found myself mesmerized by a television monitor showing a movie in a car next to me and just ahead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was driving down the road the other day and found myself mesmerized by a television monitor showing a movie in a car next to me and just ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: : &#62; o		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/01/28/driving-texting-dont-mix-for-anyone/#comment-16578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[: &#62; o]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4124#comment-16578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tea baggers, DUI&#039;s ? Getting way off point folks. Getting personal too. C&#039;mon guys, take it easy and stick to the topic at hand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea baggers, DUI&#8217;s ? Getting way off point folks. Getting personal too. C&#8217;mon guys, take it easy and stick to the topic at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
