<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Unrest In &#8220;Peaceful&#8221; Garden Valley	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mountainman		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18101</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mountainman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To All
A infant baby should not be allowed to be kept in a public school and passed around to different employees or any employee during the day PERIOD!. These folks are being paid to do their job. If this is going on it should be stopped immediately. A short visit to a school with a infant is one thing but daycare in the school is another. It shouldn’t matter if it is the principles child or not. It puts the taxpayer at a higher risk. I would think that the principle would not allow this to go on especially with it being his wife and having the appearance of a conflict of interest, favoritism and nepotism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To All<br />
A infant baby should not be allowed to be kept in a public school and passed around to different employees or any employee during the day PERIOD!. These folks are being paid to do their job. If this is going on it should be stopped immediately. A short visit to a school with a infant is one thing but daycare in the school is another. It shouldn’t matter if it is the principles child or not. It puts the taxpayer at a higher risk. I would think that the principle would not allow this to go on especially with it being his wife and having the appearance of a conflict of interest, favoritism and nepotism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GV Resident		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GV Resident]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth - in reference to your previous post - are you saying that Stan Kress did &quot;hinky&quot; things with the school district&#039;s money?  We know about the deposit but your post says &quot;Whenever Kress would to something &quot;hinky&quot; with school funds, Paula would let the board know about it.&quot;  

What do you mean by hinky and how many other incidences were there besides the deposit at Les Bois?  Maybe I should send Paula a thank you card.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth &#8211; in reference to your previous post &#8211; are you saying that Stan Kress did &#8220;hinky&#8221; things with the school district&#8217;s money?  We know about the deposit but your post says &#8220;Whenever Kress would to something &#8220;hinky&#8221; with school funds, Paula would let the board know about it.&#8221;  </p>
<p>What do you mean by hinky and how many other incidences were there besides the deposit at Les Bois?  Maybe I should send Paula a thank you card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GV Mama		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GV Mama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hate to be the one to tell you, but that baby was not the only one at the school because their parents work there.  

And GVgal - Really?  Are you at the school every day?  Don&#039;t think so becuase it&#039;s not true.

Bird Dog - your comments and not sounding too authentic.  You said kids (plural) and I know he was not passed from student to student.

Fine - policy was upheld this time or whatever.  Why did Tomlin let it go on in the first place if it was so bad for students.  The answer is because it isn&#039;t.  My theory - and it IS my opinion - is that it was a particularly uptight board member who made the complaint.  Probably worried that the sight of a baby on school grounds might insite teen pregnancy or something.  Of course no one actually ever came forward to claim the complaint.  

Permission was GRANTED by the school.  Then suddenly there was a policy?  Whatever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to be the one to tell you, but that baby was not the only one at the school because their parents work there.  </p>
<p>And GVgal &#8211; Really?  Are you at the school every day?  Don&#8217;t think so becuase it&#8217;s not true.</p>
<p>Bird Dog &#8211; your comments and not sounding too authentic.  You said kids (plural) and I know he was not passed from student to student.</p>
<p>Fine &#8211; policy was upheld this time or whatever.  Why did Tomlin let it go on in the first place if it was so bad for students.  The answer is because it isn&#8217;t.  My theory &#8211; and it IS my opinion &#8211; is that it was a particularly uptight board member who made the complaint.  Probably worried that the sight of a baby on school grounds might insite teen pregnancy or something.  Of course no one actually ever came forward to claim the complaint.  </p>
<p>Permission was GRANTED by the school.  Then suddenly there was a policy?  Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gvgal		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gvgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Hillbilly 

Perhaps we should initiate a recall for Weir &#038; Koenig who voted against policy on the baby issue!

Nah, it would be fitting, but the district can&#039;t afford the time, effort and funds for another recall. Funny how the FOGVSD don&#039;t care about that aspect of their antics!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hillbilly </p>
<p>Perhaps we should initiate a recall for Weir &amp; Koenig who voted against policy on the baby issue!</p>
<p>Nah, it would be fitting, but the district can&#8217;t afford the time, effort and funds for another recall. Funny how the FOGVSD don&#8217;t care about that aspect of their antics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gvgal		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gvgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Check out all of the lawsuits that Dolores Bedard, one of the leaders of the FOGVSD is involved in.  On that link: search Bedard First and all counties to get the full list of all of her lawsuits.

https://www.idcourts.us/repository/partyResults.do]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out all of the lawsuits that Dolores Bedard, one of the leaders of the FOGVSD is involved in.  On that link: search Bedard First and all counties to get the full list of all of her lawsuits.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.idcourts.us/repository/partyResults.do" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.idcourts.us/repository/partyResults.do</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hillbilly in the Holler		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18094</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillbilly in the Holler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Moving on out of imbecility.....let&#039;s remember that next Monday is the start of National Volunteer Week -- and a WONDERFUL opportunity for the Garden Valley community to grab ahold of!  This is what I witnessed:  Last night, after several hours of preparation, our VOLUNTEER school board went in to a 6+ hour meeting, lasting from 6pm until after midnight.  Today, several of the members continued in their effort to find more revenue sources, take patron calls, look at the biomass fuel alternatives, etc., etc., etc., while one is still continuing her fight against recall.  They are doing this along with running their normal lives and businesses.  How about we all start off fresh next week, and actually THANK them for their volunteer efforts.  The way we have all (myself included) been acting, if we were children, instead of &quot;adults&quot;, we SHOULD have landed at a well-deserved place out behind the woodshed!

If we truly want what&#039;s best for the young people of the community, we better take a hard look at the role models we are providing.  I think we could all do a little improvement in this area.  I would be totally appalled to have any of my children start behaving some of our ill-conceived attempts at acting like adults.

So, here&#039;s my proposal -- lets start over.  Stop the madness, stop the recalls, use the democratic process, start waving to each other as we used to when we pass by on the road....and next week -- as a goal -- make National Volunteer Week a meaningful one to our community -- let&#039;s start acting like the great neighbors we&#039;ve always (well, &quot;usually&quot;) been!  Let the kids see the new &quot;us&quot; -- and THANK our volunteers.  They are serving the best they know how, putting in many hours -- and if someone doesn&#039;t like what they&#039;re doing, give them the courtesy of a pleasantly stated piece of feedback.  And, if that still doesn&#039;t satisfy.....do the right thing and run for election to be a VOLUNTEER.  I&#039;ve said my piece, so, please give it a shot -- I know I will.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving on out of imbecility&#8230;..let&#8217;s remember that next Monday is the start of National Volunteer Week &#8212; and a WONDERFUL opportunity for the Garden Valley community to grab ahold of!  This is what I witnessed:  Last night, after several hours of preparation, our VOLUNTEER school board went in to a 6+ hour meeting, lasting from 6pm until after midnight.  Today, several of the members continued in their effort to find more revenue sources, take patron calls, look at the biomass fuel alternatives, etc., etc., etc., while one is still continuing her fight against recall.  They are doing this along with running their normal lives and businesses.  How about we all start off fresh next week, and actually THANK them for their volunteer efforts.  The way we have all (myself included) been acting, if we were children, instead of &#8220;adults&#8221;, we SHOULD have landed at a well-deserved place out behind the woodshed!</p>
<p>If we truly want what&#8217;s best for the young people of the community, we better take a hard look at the role models we are providing.  I think we could all do a little improvement in this area.  I would be totally appalled to have any of my children start behaving some of our ill-conceived attempts at acting like adults.</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s my proposal &#8212; lets start over.  Stop the madness, stop the recalls, use the democratic process, start waving to each other as we used to when we pass by on the road&#8230;.and next week &#8212; as a goal &#8212; make National Volunteer Week a meaningful one to our community &#8212; let&#8217;s start acting like the great neighbors we&#8217;ve always (well, &#8220;usually&#8221;) been!  Let the kids see the new &#8220;us&#8221; &#8212; and THANK our volunteers.  They are serving the best they know how, putting in many hours &#8212; and if someone doesn&#8217;t like what they&#8217;re doing, give them the courtesy of a pleasantly stated piece of feedback.  And, if that still doesn&#8217;t satisfy&#8230;..do the right thing and run for election to be a VOLUNTEER.  I&#8217;ve said my piece, so, please give it a shot &#8212; I know I will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GV Middle Man		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18093</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GV Middle Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One last comment to GV Mom about the baby, and then I will drop it.  Your fact #1 is wrong.  The baby DID NOT spend all it&#039;s time in the classroom with mom.  Not until it was brought to the moms attention, THEN she kept it with her.  The first few weeks the baby was back with her, I saw her everywhere.  I happen to go into the main office one day, only to find the secretary holding the crying baby.  I came in a few days later only to see the baby in the principals office (her dad), crying while he was trying to meet with a student.  Another day I came in, another staff member in the school office was holding the baby, feeding her a bottle.  Is this a huge deal, no, but the fact is, the baby DID NOT stay in the room with mom, and that&#039;s probably where the problem started. I know of a friend who called the school the one day, and when the secretary answered the phone, she was holding..you guessed it..the baby who was crying.  I agree..she should have never been allowed there, but beings the super was new at this, and had heard that it had been done before, he agreed to it.  Not until he started getting complaints from patrons saying &quot;why are my tax dollars paying for childcare&quot; did it become an issue.  

I did not in any way mean to sound like the 1st grade parents are dumb young ladies who signed something they didn&#039;t know.  What I meant was that some of them (and I&#039;ve talked to a few to know this first hand) signed it, just to shut one of the moms up who wouldn&#039;t drop it.  They signed it just to get her off their backs.  One in particular says that she is appalled with herself for doing it, saying she was &quot;forced&quot; into  it. There was a petition passed around at the childrens Christmas Concert getting people to sign it, how silly is that.  I go there to listen to a wonderful celebration of the season, only to be asked to sign a petition???  I believe there is a rule about not having petitions with 30&#039; of the school???  I&#039;m not sure on the distance....???  When Elmore called it to administrations attention, that got added to her &quot;recall petition&quot;.  She&#039;s trying to keep the school from getting sued for allowing such a thing to happen, and people complained.  Anyhow, I won&#039;t go on &#038; on about that, I just wanted you to know that I wasn&#039;t trying to make it sound like the moms were dumb, I just felt that some of them were taken advantage of by older moms &quot;bullying&quot; them into signing things, maybe not you, but trust me there were others that felt that way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last comment to GV Mom about the baby, and then I will drop it.  Your fact #1 is wrong.  The baby DID NOT spend all it&#8217;s time in the classroom with mom.  Not until it was brought to the moms attention, THEN she kept it with her.  The first few weeks the baby was back with her, I saw her everywhere.  I happen to go into the main office one day, only to find the secretary holding the crying baby.  I came in a few days later only to see the baby in the principals office (her dad), crying while he was trying to meet with a student.  Another day I came in, another staff member in the school office was holding the baby, feeding her a bottle.  Is this a huge deal, no, but the fact is, the baby DID NOT stay in the room with mom, and that&#8217;s probably where the problem started. I know of a friend who called the school the one day, and when the secretary answered the phone, she was holding..you guessed it..the baby who was crying.  I agree..she should have never been allowed there, but beings the super was new at this, and had heard that it had been done before, he agreed to it.  Not until he started getting complaints from patrons saying &#8220;why are my tax dollars paying for childcare&#8221; did it become an issue.  </p>
<p>I did not in any way mean to sound like the 1st grade parents are dumb young ladies who signed something they didn&#8217;t know.  What I meant was that some of them (and I&#8217;ve talked to a few to know this first hand) signed it, just to shut one of the moms up who wouldn&#8217;t drop it.  They signed it just to get her off their backs.  One in particular says that she is appalled with herself for doing it, saying she was &#8220;forced&#8221; into  it. There was a petition passed around at the childrens Christmas Concert getting people to sign it, how silly is that.  I go there to listen to a wonderful celebration of the season, only to be asked to sign a petition???  I believe there is a rule about not having petitions with 30&#8242; of the school???  I&#8217;m not sure on the distance&#8230;.???  When Elmore called it to administrations attention, that got added to her &#8220;recall petition&#8221;.  She&#8217;s trying to keep the school from getting sued for allowing such a thing to happen, and people complained.  Anyhow, I won&#8217;t go on &amp; on about that, I just wanted you to know that I wasn&#8217;t trying to make it sound like the moms were dumb, I just felt that some of them were taken advantage of by older moms &#8220;bullying&#8221; them into signing things, maybe not you, but trust me there were others that felt that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SNOWBIRD		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SNOWBIRD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[gvgal- You for sure have your facts wrong! 
The teacher works part time now, only in the afternoons when her child is taken care of by someone who only works in the mornings. So you are saying the school can tell the mom and child to stay out of the school when the mom is not working? Nobody is babysitting the kid at the school. Seriously get your facts straight before you start spreading more rumors. Just what we need!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gvgal- You for sure have your facts wrong!<br />
The teacher works part time now, only in the afternoons when her child is taken care of by someone who only works in the mornings. So you are saying the school can tell the mom and child to stay out of the school when the mom is not working? Nobody is babysitting the kid at the school. Seriously get your facts straight before you start spreading more rumors. Just what we need!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hillbilly in the Holler		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillbilly in the Holler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Absolutely BE DONE with the baby deal....and here is why:  GVSD Policy Manual Policy No. 215, &quot;Duties of the Board No. 11. Exclude from school, children not of school age.&quot;  Three of the board members voted according to POLICY -- two others did not. The informed majority followed the DISTRICT POLICY.  Now, let us quit acting like imbeciles and support the board we have in place and get on with doing the best for our children.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely BE DONE with the baby deal&#8230;.and here is why:  GVSD Policy Manual Policy No. 215, &#8220;Duties of the Board No. 11. Exclude from school, children not of school age.&#8221;  Three of the board members voted according to POLICY &#8212; two others did not. The informed majority followed the DISTRICT POLICY.  Now, let us quit acting like imbeciles and support the board we have in place and get on with doing the best for our children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gvgal		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2010/04/08/unrest-in-peaceful-garden-valley/#comment-18090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gvgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=4491#comment-18090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Snowbird:

From what I&#039;ve heard, the baby may not be in the classroom anymore but is still in the school, being passed from staffer to staffer during the day. Time for the board to get crackin&#039; on the issue again, &#039;cause it&#039;s still a liability and a misuse of taxpayer&#039;s money having school staff babysit the kid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Snowbird:</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard, the baby may not be in the classroom anymore but is still in the school, being passed from staffer to staffer during the day. Time for the board to get crackin&#8217; on the issue again, &#8217;cause it&#8217;s still a liability and a misuse of taxpayer&#8217;s money having school staff babysit the kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
