<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Avimor Parent Could Leave Arizona Buyers On The Hook	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2011/01/05/avimor-parent-leaves-arizona-buyers-on-the-hook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/01/05/avimor-parent-leaves-arizona-buyers-on-the-hook/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dog		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/01/05/avimor-parent-leaves-arizona-buyers-on-the-hook/#comment-21856</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=5859#comment-21856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We need to give the rich more tax breaks so they won&#039;t feel like fleecing us tax payers so much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to give the rich more tax breaks so they won&#8217;t feel like fleecing us tax payers so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sisyphus		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/01/05/avimor-parent-leaves-arizona-buyers-on-the-hook/#comment-21851</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sisyphus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=5859#comment-21851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I recall, the bill had bipartisan support until Mayor Bieter warned of just this consequence.  Then Republicans rammed it through.  

Capitalism should have risk.  Developers used government to ameliorate their risk and spread it to their dupes, er, homeowners allowing the developer to escape the consequences of failure.  Sounds like socialism to me, and one which would artificially create an unsustainable real estate bubble.  People better wise up and recognize whose got their hands on their wallets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, the bill had bipartisan support until Mayor Bieter warned of just this consequence.  Then Republicans rammed it through.  </p>
<p>Capitalism should have risk.  Developers used government to ameliorate their risk and spread it to their dupes, er, homeowners allowing the developer to escape the consequences of failure.  Sounds like socialism to me, and one which would artificially create an unsustainable real estate bubble.  People better wise up and recognize whose got their hands on their wallets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sam the sham		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/01/05/avimor-parent-leaves-arizona-buyers-on-the-hook/#comment-21849</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sam the sham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=5859#comment-21849</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rather like the problem residents of Boise County are facing... the people they trusted made an error in judgement, were sued, lost the law suit and (do the idiots making the decision pay - no o o o ) the tax payers will foot the bill. 
Always it trickles down leaving the money in the deep pockets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather like the problem residents of Boise County are facing&#8230; the people they trusted made an error in judgement, were sued, lost the law suit and (do the idiots making the decision pay &#8211; no o o o ) the tax payers will foot the bill.<br />
Always it trickles down leaving the money in the deep pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/01/05/avimor-parent-leaves-arizona-buyers-on-the-hook/#comment-21838</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=5859#comment-21838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Suncor probably wishes Team Dave had won its lawsuit against Ada County.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suncor probably wishes Team Dave had won its lawsuit against Ada County.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jimmyz		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/01/05/avimor-parent-leaves-arizona-buyers-on-the-hook/#comment-21833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmyz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=5859#comment-21833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Boise got its first equivalent to a CFD with the CID that was set up for the new Harris Ranch subdivision.  First of its kind in Idaho.  Similar requirements...extra taxes based on value of the home to fund the development.  I didn&#039;t know the homeowners were on the hook if it didn&#039;t work out though.  I thought the bond holders took that risk.

EDITOR NOTE--We often hear the idea the risk is on the backs of the bondholders.  Do you think they will simply say, &quot;aw shucks I lost $14 million?&quot;  There aren&#039;t many loan deals that don&#039;t require collateral and the bondholders will quickly go after sewer, water, roads, etc....or even ski lifts!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boise got its first equivalent to a CFD with the CID that was set up for the new Harris Ranch subdivision.  First of its kind in Idaho.  Similar requirements&#8230;extra taxes based on value of the home to fund the development.  I didn&#8217;t know the homeowners were on the hook if it didn&#8217;t work out though.  I thought the bond holders took that risk.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;We often hear the idea the risk is on the backs of the bondholders.  Do you think they will simply say, &#8220;aw shucks I lost $14 million?&#8221;  There aren&#8217;t many loan deals that don&#8217;t require collateral and the bondholders will quickly go after sewer, water, roads, etc&#8230;.or even ski lifts!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
