<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Crapo Caters To Special Interests, Reduces Revenue	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JO		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23330</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is a revealing site from an Independent US Senator

http://front.moveon.org/2-which-corporations-are-the-biggest-freeloaders/?rc=recirctest]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a revealing site from an Independent US Senator</p>
<p><a href="http://front.moveon.org/2-which-corporations-are-the-biggest-freeloaders/?rc=recirctest" rel="nofollow ugc">http://front.moveon.org/2-which-corporations-are-the-biggest-freeloaders/?rc=recirctest</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: serendipity		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23303</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[serendipity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: Crapo calling for upping taxes to support bulding more nukes--why? because the giant insurance industries consider them too risky and therefore won&#039;t insure them.
From Crapo&#039;s page:
&quot;A similar bill passed out of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee last session but Senate leadership did not bring it up for a vote by the full Senate.&quot;

GOOD!The Senate majority are still smart and resistant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Crapo calling for upping taxes to support bulding more nukes&#8211;why? because the giant insurance industries consider them too risky and therefore won&#8217;t insure them.<br />
From Crapo&#8217;s page:<br />
&#8220;A similar bill passed out of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee last session but Senate leadership did not bring it up for a vote by the full Senate.&#8221;</p>
<p>GOOD!The Senate majority are still smart and resistant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zippo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zippo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Taxed Out,  Question:  Do you think the lack of trust in our governmental leadership is real or a product of Chicken Little media?

I think it is because leadership has failed to care for Middle America first. http://www.ktvb.com/news/Plant-closures-could-cost-600-jobs-119480184.html


It&#039;s 1933 dude, they thought it was over too.  The good news is the avarage teenager is more conservative than the average boomer.  Good for the country, not for the boomers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxed Out,  Question:  Do you think the lack of trust in our governmental leadership is real or a product of Chicken Little media?</p>
<p>I think it is because leadership has failed to care for Middle America first. <a href="http://www.ktvb.com/news/Plant-closures-could-cost-600-jobs-119480184.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ktvb.com/news/Plant-closures-could-cost-600-jobs-119480184.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s 1933 dude, they thought it was over too.  The good news is the avarage teenager is more conservative than the average boomer.  Good for the country, not for the boomers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taxed Out!		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taxed Out!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Both sides in Washington (as well as many of the posters responding to this post) are playing the part of Chicken Little in an effort to get their way on social issues or to protect their own self interests. 

The basic structure of the country&#039;s political structure works--no civil war since the 1860s--increasing levels of education since forever--a growing economy since for ever (you got to have economic up and down cycles to have progress)--increasing more levels of civil rights since the civil war and especially since the 1960s(despite a large segment of the population who,out of fear, want to take them away for every body else but themselves)--social security and medicare (which have made much of our high standard of living possible) have become a solid standard of who we are as a people and allowed the countries children to go to college, be mobile and contribute to the economy--the list of what is working in the country could go on and on. 

Yes, the government needs adjustments--the country has always needed adjustments. The biggest adjustment might be to stop corporations from buying our political system, from using scare tactics to divide us--from buying us! In the end are we any different than our political leaders?

Our political structure has worked well and it gives everyone the chance to have a say--(right Guardian)unfortunately, corporations get to say a lot more than the rest of us because speech in this country cost a lot of money. 

Still corporations feel they need to buy and con the population and buy politicians to protect their interests and get their way. The most often used tactic is to play on the fear factor genetically programed in to all of us. Even more unfortunately, it works. The sky is not falling! We do not need to go back to the 1930s (which were not the good old days)as we almost did a couple of years ago. We need to stop social engineering with the budget and get real. 

As far as I can, with my limited grasp of macroeconomics, tell the Simpson Bowles Commission had the best approach. 

http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both sides in Washington (as well as many of the posters responding to this post) are playing the part of Chicken Little in an effort to get their way on social issues or to protect their own self interests. </p>
<p>The basic structure of the country&#8217;s political structure works&#8211;no civil war since the 1860s&#8211;increasing levels of education since forever&#8211;a growing economy since for ever (you got to have economic up and down cycles to have progress)&#8211;increasing more levels of civil rights since the civil war and especially since the 1960s(despite a large segment of the population who,out of fear, want to take them away for every body else but themselves)&#8211;social security and medicare (which have made much of our high standard of living possible) have become a solid standard of who we are as a people and allowed the countries children to go to college, be mobile and contribute to the economy&#8211;the list of what is working in the country could go on and on. </p>
<p>Yes, the government needs adjustments&#8211;the country has always needed adjustments. The biggest adjustment might be to stop corporations from buying our political system, from using scare tactics to divide us&#8211;from buying us! In the end are we any different than our political leaders?</p>
<p>Our political structure has worked well and it gives everyone the chance to have a say&#8211;(right Guardian)unfortunately, corporations get to say a lot more than the rest of us because speech in this country cost a lot of money. </p>
<p>Still corporations feel they need to buy and con the population and buy politicians to protect their interests and get their way. The most often used tactic is to play on the fear factor genetically programed in to all of us. Even more unfortunately, it works. The sky is not falling! We do not need to go back to the 1930s (which were not the good old days)as we almost did a couple of years ago. We need to stop social engineering with the budget and get real. </p>
<p>As far as I can, with my limited grasp of macroeconomics, tell the Simpson Bowles Commission had the best approach. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dog		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23284</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Crapo is a slut for corporate tax breaks like most Republicans. Risch is the Gestapo for corporate tax breaks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crapo is a slut for corporate tax breaks like most Republicans. Risch is the Gestapo for corporate tax breaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They won&#039;t be happy until we have two classes of people in this country. Rich and everyone else.  I maintain that the progressive tax system I grew up with in the 50&#039;s and 60&#039;s has become a program of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer with the Bush era tax cuts.  There was no reason for this other than greed.  Now we are in a budgetary mess.  I also agree governement employment has now surpassed the numbers of people in manufacturing jobs in this country. The marginal tax rate of 35% on the rich is problematic when you look back on the 91% rate that was in effect in the 1950&#039;s.  The rich also insulate themselves from taxes via stock options and the 15% capital gains tax rate.

I think my kids will be the last of a generation that had the advantage of a stay at home mother.  We have people working 40 hour weeks and not even able to make the rent on a roof over their heads. Cheap labor, cheap land and lousy paying jobs are killing this country.  When we finally strip all the dignity from the working people of this country hang on.  It is going to be ugly.  Think it can&#039;t happen, look back at the labor strife of the 1930&#039;s.  Take a look at the uprisings in the Middle East.  When unemployment hits 25-30
% I look for all hell to break loose in the land of the free and the home of the brave.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won&#8217;t be happy until we have two classes of people in this country. Rich and everyone else.  I maintain that the progressive tax system I grew up with in the 50&#8217;s and 60&#8217;s has become a program of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer with the Bush era tax cuts.  There was no reason for this other than greed.  Now we are in a budgetary mess.  I also agree governement employment has now surpassed the numbers of people in manufacturing jobs in this country. The marginal tax rate of 35% on the rich is problematic when you look back on the 91% rate that was in effect in the 1950&#8217;s.  The rich also insulate themselves from taxes via stock options and the 15% capital gains tax rate.</p>
<p>I think my kids will be the last of a generation that had the advantage of a stay at home mother.  We have people working 40 hour weeks and not even able to make the rent on a roof over their heads. Cheap labor, cheap land and lousy paying jobs are killing this country.  When we finally strip all the dignity from the working people of this country hang on.  It is going to be ugly.  Think it can&#8217;t happen, look back at the labor strife of the 1930&#8217;s.  Take a look at the uprisings in the Middle East.  When unemployment hits 25-30<br />
% I look for all hell to break loose in the land of the free and the home of the brave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nan emouse		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nan emouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, adjustments to &quot;entitlements&quot; can be made now or the whole thing can come crashing down in a few years.  I don&#039;t think Ryan is saying no more Medicare, no more Social Security, no more Medicaid, but rather here&#039;s some tweaking that will extend the life of these schemes for decades.  If you don&#039;t agree that we have a problem, then you haven&#039;t been paying attention.

Rod in SE, Social Security is a Ponzi scheme.  Your money is gone, it&#039;s gone to pay grandma.  Your grandkid&#039;s and kid&#039;s contributions will be what funds yours.  If you live long enough, you&#039;ll reap way more than you put in.  Same with Medicare.

These are not &quot;entitlements&quot;.  You&#039;re not &quot;entitled&quot; no matter what the pelosi the democrats say.  Why not?  Because congress can change the formula, the distribution, any of it anytime they want.  Read the law.

We have hard choices to make in this country.  Whining about how mean the Republicans are to the elderly and the children is just falling into the Democrat trap.  Broaden your mind a little and educate yourself.  Vouchers have been used successfully for a lot of things.  Rhode Island has saved a boatload of money on Medicaid with a block grant type system.  

Or we can do nothing like that pelosi Reid wants and the whole system will crash. (pelosi is the new s--t in case you were wondering)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, adjustments to &#8220;entitlements&#8221; can be made now or the whole thing can come crashing down in a few years.  I don&#8217;t think Ryan is saying no more Medicare, no more Social Security, no more Medicaid, but rather here&#8217;s some tweaking that will extend the life of these schemes for decades.  If you don&#8217;t agree that we have a problem, then you haven&#8217;t been paying attention.</p>
<p>Rod in SE, Social Security is a Ponzi scheme.  Your money is gone, it&#8217;s gone to pay grandma.  Your grandkid&#8217;s and kid&#8217;s contributions will be what funds yours.  If you live long enough, you&#8217;ll reap way more than you put in.  Same with Medicare.</p>
<p>These are not &#8220;entitlements&#8221;.  You&#8217;re not &#8220;entitled&#8221; no matter what the pelosi the democrats say.  Why not?  Because congress can change the formula, the distribution, any of it anytime they want.  Read the law.</p>
<p>We have hard choices to make in this country.  Whining about how mean the Republicans are to the elderly and the children is just falling into the Democrat trap.  Broaden your mind a little and educate yourself.  Vouchers have been used successfully for a lot of things.  Rhode Island has saved a boatload of money on Medicaid with a block grant type system.  </p>
<p>Or we can do nothing like that pelosi Reid wants and the whole system will crash. (pelosi is the new s&#8211;t in case you were wondering)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod in SE Boise		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod in SE Boise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Republicans are offering us a choice between living in a dog-eat-dog world where it&#039;s every man for himself and to hell with the sick and disabled, and if you don&#039;t inherit a lot of dough, you can work for pennies all your life and die when you can&#039;t walk to work anymore - or living in a civilized society.

Off topic, but I just love this:  We don&#039;t need more gun control, we need more control over crazy people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republicans are offering us a choice between living in a dog-eat-dog world where it&#8217;s every man for himself and to hell with the sick and disabled, and if you don&#8217;t inherit a lot of dough, you can work for pennies all your life and die when you can&#8217;t walk to work anymore &#8211; or living in a civilized society.</p>
<p>Off topic, but I just love this:  We don&#8217;t need more gun control, we need more control over crazy people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cyclops		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rod, if you were insulted, I apologize. You must see that we simply don&#039;t have the capability to supply the support you espouse. You are incorrect that this is the function  of government. Government is supposed to supply interstate capabilties and defense, PERIOD! That is what the framers designed in the beginning. Politicians have bastardized the purpose of government for a couple of hundred years so that we have today 3-4 generations that believe the government should be the answer to every single need we have. I have paid into the same programs you have. I have fought for our country as well. I guess the difference between our philosophies is that I consider it &quot;pay-back&quot; in exchange for living in the greatest country in history. You seem to view it as an &quot;investment&quot;. Sorry we disagree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rod, if you were insulted, I apologize. You must see that we simply don&#8217;t have the capability to supply the support you espouse. You are incorrect that this is the function  of government. Government is supposed to supply interstate capabilties and defense, PERIOD! That is what the framers designed in the beginning. Politicians have bastardized the purpose of government for a couple of hundred years so that we have today 3-4 generations that believe the government should be the answer to every single need we have. I have paid into the same programs you have. I have fought for our country as well. I guess the difference between our philosophies is that I consider it &#8220;pay-back&#8221; in exchange for living in the greatest country in history. You seem to view it as an &#8220;investment&#8221;. Sorry we disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zippo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/04/05/6195/#comment-23270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zippo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6195#comment-23270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RSEB,  Thank you for your service,

The Dems and Republicans both have placed the entitlements under the bus.  I find it disgusting considering promises made.  Even more disgusting considering the wasteful spending which continues on other less important things.  It&#039;s easier to short people than the corporation that gives money and free jet trips I guess?

Dem talking points?  Try a variety of sources, as the old media dogs have drifted severely to the left since the 70s.  You may wish to go to a local TEA party meeting, you may find some comfortable old concepts and perhaps some old friends too.  It&#039;s not the bunch of crazies the Obama-speak says it is.

Inflation is here according to Wal-Mart, and I trust them a bunch more than the Fed.  Inflation is traditionally how broke nations escape debt overload. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSEB,  Thank you for your service,</p>
<p>The Dems and Republicans both have placed the entitlements under the bus.  I find it disgusting considering promises made.  Even more disgusting considering the wasteful spending which continues on other less important things.  It&#8217;s easier to short people than the corporation that gives money and free jet trips I guess?</p>
<p>Dem talking points?  Try a variety of sources, as the old media dogs have drifted severely to the left since the 70s.  You may wish to go to a local TEA party meeting, you may find some comfortable old concepts and perhaps some old friends too.  It&#8217;s not the bunch of crazies the Obama-speak says it is.</p>
<p>Inflation is here according to Wal-Mart, and I trust them a bunch more than the Fed.  Inflation is traditionally how broke nations escape debt overload. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
