<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ada Probation Agency Comes Under Scrutiny	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:37:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Laina		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25522</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25522</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AND PEOPLE WONDER WHY IDAHO IS SO BROKE RIGHT NOW!!  THE SYSTEM IS SO RIDICULOUSLY UNFAIR, UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY, AND SCREWED THE HELL UP.  ITS BECAUSE OF PROBATION OFFICERS WHO DON&#039;T WORK THEIR JOB IN AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE OTHERS LIVES, BUT TO RUIN OTHERS LIVES. ITS LIKE THEY WAKE UP AND SAY &quot;HMMM...LETS SEE WHAT I CAN PUT HIM IN JAIL FOR TODAY BECAUSE IM SO F#@%&amp;* BORED&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AND PEOPLE WONDER WHY IDAHO IS SO BROKE RIGHT NOW!!  THE SYSTEM IS SO RIDICULOUSLY UNFAIR, UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY, AND SCREWED THE HELL UP.  ITS BECAUSE OF PROBATION OFFICERS WHO DON&#8217;T WORK THEIR JOB IN AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE OTHERS LIVES, BUT TO RUIN OTHERS LIVES. ITS LIKE THEY WAKE UP AND SAY &#8220;HMMM&#8230;LETS SEE WHAT I CAN PUT HIM IN JAIL FOR TODAY BECAUSE IM SO F#@%&#038;* BORED&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laina		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just for some information--a big reason they&#039;re trying to steal client&#039;s money is because they spend 60 bucks on these stupid spice tests that never come back positive anyways. it&#039;s just a waste of money.  since they began sending the tests in, they&#039;ve raised cost of supervision, and seem to be giving more and more of them. it&#039;s really frustrating to work your ass off and get nothing in return.  the probation officers in moscow are just terrible.  they don&#039;t listen to you at all and you absolutely cannot go to them for help.  i know this girl who just got her third spice test and hasn&#039;t even failed one.  she admitted to smoking spice once, didn&#039;t even fail the test, did 2 days, and they are continuing to ua her all the time.  sounds like a waste of money to me.  and probationers wonder why c.o.s. went up.  ridiculous.  i dont know how some of them sleep at night. you work and work and work to do the right thing and it&#039;s never good enough.  it&#039;s pretty discouraging. makes it even harder to stay sober.  they send all the tests not done in the office to redwood toxicology, an advanced drug-testing lab, however, what&#039;s the point of spending the money if the individual is doing well?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for some information&#8211;a big reason they&#8217;re trying to steal client&#8217;s money is because they spend 60 bucks on these stupid spice tests that never come back positive anyways. it&#8217;s just a waste of money.  since they began sending the tests in, they&#8217;ve raised cost of supervision, and seem to be giving more and more of them. it&#8217;s really frustrating to work your ass off and get nothing in return.  the probation officers in moscow are just terrible.  they don&#8217;t listen to you at all and you absolutely cannot go to them for help.  i know this girl who just got her third spice test and hasn&#8217;t even failed one.  she admitted to smoking spice once, didn&#8217;t even fail the test, did 2 days, and they are continuing to ua her all the time.  sounds like a waste of money to me.  and probationers wonder why c.o.s. went up.  ridiculous.  i dont know how some of them sleep at night. you work and work and work to do the right thing and it&#8217;s never good enough.  it&#8217;s pretty discouraging. makes it even harder to stay sober.  they send all the tests not done in the office to redwood toxicology, an advanced drug-testing lab, however, what&#8217;s the point of spending the money if the individual is doing well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fees		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fees]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Probationer2, my 2nd request was to ACMPS and they were the ones who told me to subpoena them, even though they knew I was off probation.

They obviously know about all of this and are in obstructionist/protectionist mode.

Personally, I hope they hide and falsify their records. I can substantiate 75% of it on my own. The labs will do the rest. Any discrepancy between our records will prove concealment on their part.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probationer2, my 2nd request was to ACMPS and they were the ones who told me to subpoena them, even though they knew I was off probation.</p>
<p>They obviously know about all of this and are in obstructionist/protectionist mode.</p>
<p>Personally, I hope they hide and falsify their records. I can substantiate 75% of it on my own. The labs will do the rest. Any discrepancy between our records will prove concealment on their part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Publica		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Publica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nick:

I don&#039;t see any Ada case where you are on probation.  If you are off probation you can still be a part of the class that Phil Gordon is suing on behalf of.  Call his office.

Misdemeanor probation is limited to two years per charge and I haven&#039;t seen anything consecutive unless a felony is being reduced to a misdemeanor.

If you are in violation of probation it is possible to &quot;toll&quot; the probation and thereby extend it at PV disposition, but most of the magistrates in Ada aren&#039;t going to go out past the two years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any Ada case where you are on probation.  If you are off probation you can still be a part of the class that Phil Gordon is suing on behalf of.  Call his office.</p>
<p>Misdemeanor probation is limited to two years per charge and I haven&#8217;t seen anything consecutive unless a felony is being reduced to a misdemeanor.</p>
<p>If you are in violation of probation it is possible to &#8220;toll&#8221; the probation and thereby extend it at PV disposition, but most of the magistrates in Ada aren&#8217;t going to go out past the two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nickolas Jennings		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25343</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nickolas Jennings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Been struggling with this for 2.5 years.  Transferred to different PO&#039;s with no real plan to help me finish probation.  Mixed messages.  I&#039;ve paid my debt ten fold, and am tired of playing the game.  Out of money now, any lawyers out there wanting to do pro-bono work I could use the help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been struggling with this for 2.5 years.  Transferred to different PO&#8217;s with no real plan to help me finish probation.  Mixed messages.  I&#8217;ve paid my debt ten fold, and am tired of playing the game.  Out of money now, any lawyers out there wanting to do pro-bono work I could use the help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Publica		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25336</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Publica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Probationer2 - It cannot be a PV to request the information.  A violation of probation has to be a violation of the specific terms of your probation.  (Which makes it problematic that probation threatens violations for things which are not a term of the probation, like being employed or a student...)

Yes, your PO SHOULD give you a copy.  The reality is that the PO isn&#039;t going to do anything that a probationer demands.  Your attorney can cause stuff to happen, though.  BUT, if you are doing well on probation, why not ask the PO for your UA results?  If they don&#039;t provide you that, post it on here.

Just be aware that probation doesn&#039;t want people rocking the boat.  If you are trying to get your UA results and probation learns about it, my guess is they will put a target on you.  Don&#039;t miss the UA line or a payment or anything after that.

I have represented tons of people on misdemeanor probation violations.  Normal violations are:

- PO contact
- UAs
- Fines/costs/restitution
- Jail/SILD/SCS
- Classes
- New crimes
- Employment

I&#039;m having to think hard to come up with any violation not on that list.  And those are the basic things that the monthly check-in is about.  Missed UAs?  Paid fines?  Finished class?  Committed murder?

I have never seen a PV for not paying the monthly cost of supervision, although I have had a bunch of clients tell me that probation tells them to pay COS first, THEN court stuff.  That&#039;s backwards and it creates a violation of probation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probationer2 &#8211; It cannot be a PV to request the information.  A violation of probation has to be a violation of the specific terms of your probation.  (Which makes it problematic that probation threatens violations for things which are not a term of the probation, like being employed or a student&#8230;)</p>
<p>Yes, your PO SHOULD give you a copy.  The reality is that the PO isn&#8217;t going to do anything that a probationer demands.  Your attorney can cause stuff to happen, though.  BUT, if you are doing well on probation, why not ask the PO for your UA results?  If they don&#8217;t provide you that, post it on here.</p>
<p>Just be aware that probation doesn&#8217;t want people rocking the boat.  If you are trying to get your UA results and probation learns about it, my guess is they will put a target on you.  Don&#8217;t miss the UA line or a payment or anything after that.</p>
<p>I have represented tons of people on misdemeanor probation violations.  Normal violations are:</p>
<p>&#8211; PO contact<br />
&#8211; UAs<br />
&#8211; Fines/costs/restitution<br />
&#8211; Jail/SILD/SCS<br />
&#8211; Classes<br />
&#8211; New crimes<br />
&#8211; Employment</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having to think hard to come up with any violation not on that list.  And those are the basic things that the monthly check-in is about.  Missed UAs?  Paid fines?  Finished class?  Committed murder?</p>
<p>I have never seen a PV for not paying the monthly cost of supervision, although I have had a bunch of clients tell me that probation tells them to pay COS first, THEN court stuff.  That&#8217;s backwards and it creates a violation of probation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: probationer2		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[probationer2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FEEs: Thank you for the information. Have you tried to obtain the information from ACMPS? I am curious to know if they were able to provide you with the information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEEs: Thank you for the information. Have you tried to obtain the information from ACMPS? I am curious to know if they were able to provide you with the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: probationer2		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[probationer2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FEES: thank you for that information. I was going to go in there and request the information from them. saves me the hassel of having to deal with them. I am going to request my information this week and see what kind of bull they come up with!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEES: thank you for that information. I was going to go in there and request the information from them. saves me the hassel of having to deal with them. I am going to request my information this week and see what kind of bull they come up with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fees		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fees]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I went into the lab to get a copy of my UAs and was told that they could not give them to me because they were the property of ACMPS. They wouldn&#039;t even give me a printout of the days I was there, the money I paid, or anything. They said to call ACMPS. They told me I&#039;d have to subpoena them if I wanted them.

Right now, I think ACMPS is on an obstructionist path in damage-control mode. The truth always comes out, though. And, if they falsify or perjure themselves over this issue it will only make their situation worse.

Subpoena Duces Tecum... A powerful tool :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went into the lab to get a copy of my UAs and was told that they could not give them to me because they were the property of ACMPS. They wouldn&#8217;t even give me a printout of the days I was there, the money I paid, or anything. They said to call ACMPS. They told me I&#8217;d have to subpoena them if I wanted them.</p>
<p>Right now, I think ACMPS is on an obstructionist path in damage-control mode. The truth always comes out, though. And, if they falsify or perjure themselves over this issue it will only make their situation worse.</p>
<p>Subpoena Duces Tecum&#8230; A powerful tool 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: probationer2		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/05/24/ada-probation-agency-comes-under-scrutiny/#comment-25324</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[probationer2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6473#comment-25324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, I have a &quot;CONTRACT&quot; through Nancy, who Has a Contract with global drug testing. I shouldn&#039;t have to ask them for a UA Log. I should be able to request one from my PO. as for the printing fee, I pay them enough as it is!- again, it goes back to making money, a sucking people dry!
I was not ordered by the Judge to do testings. I was ordered to report to my PO, pay my fines, do my classes. which are complete. I was also not ordered to do Group sessions when meeting my PO. I pay 50 a month I should be able to have a private meeting/ get records from them..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I have a &#8220;CONTRACT&#8221; through Nancy, who Has a Contract with global drug testing. I shouldn&#8217;t have to ask them for a UA Log. I should be able to request one from my PO. as for the printing fee, I pay them enough as it is!- again, it goes back to making money, a sucking people dry!<br />
I was not ordered by the Judge to do testings. I was ordered to report to my PO, pay my fines, do my classes. which are complete. I was also not ordered to do Group sessions when meeting my PO. I pay 50 a month I should be able to have a private meeting/ get records from them..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
