<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update On City Cleaning Contract Caper	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2011/06/14/update-on-city-cleaning-contract-caper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/06/14/update-on-city-cleaning-contract-caper/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Grumpy ole guy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/06/14/update-on-city-cleaning-contract-caper/#comment-24029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grumpy ole guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6581#comment-24029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why was the &quot;old&quot; contract continued for an entire year.  If the &quot;active investigation&quot; is completed in less than a year should not the previously deemed winning contract be honored at that time?  What if said investigation lasts for longer than one year, will the contract be re-advertised and re-bid with exclusionary wording?  Or, would it automatically be renewed, again for an entire year, by the present holder?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was the &#8220;old&#8221; contract continued for an entire year.  If the &#8220;active investigation&#8221; is completed in less than a year should not the previously deemed winning contract be honored at that time?  What if said investigation lasts for longer than one year, will the contract be re-advertised and re-bid with exclusionary wording?  Or, would it automatically be renewed, again for an entire year, by the present holder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill McCrory		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/06/14/update-on-city-cleaning-contract-caper/#comment-23895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill McCrory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6581#comment-23895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At what point does police involvement become a police investigation exempt from the IPRL?

If I am required to submit completed  fingerprint cards with an employment application and if I obtain those completed cards from a police agency, does that constitute a police investigation sufficient to exempt otherwise public information?  

If an NCIC or state criminal history check is required by a prospective employer on an applicant, does a law enforcement agency&#039;s response constitute a police investigation justifying exemption?  

The question is, do police administrative actions automatically amount to police investigations subject to exemption?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what point does police involvement become a police investigation exempt from the IPRL?</p>
<p>If I am required to submit completed  fingerprint cards with an employment application and if I obtain those completed cards from a police agency, does that constitute a police investigation sufficient to exempt otherwise public information?  </p>
<p>If an NCIC or state criminal history check is required by a prospective employer on an applicant, does a law enforcement agency&#8217;s response constitute a police investigation justifying exemption?  </p>
<p>The question is, do police administrative actions automatically amount to police investigations subject to exemption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jean		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/06/14/update-on-city-cleaning-contract-caper/#comment-23888</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6581#comment-23888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What a joke! This is just a cover up.....period.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a joke! This is just a cover up&#8230;..period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod in SE Boise		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2011/06/14/update-on-city-cleaning-contract-caper/#comment-23877</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod in SE Boise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=6581#comment-23877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So....the library is a &quot;security-sensitive&quot; site?   Really?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;.the library is a &#8220;security-sensitive&#8221; site?   Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
