Comments on: Big League Baseball Depends On Minor League Public Funds

By: Paul

Paul — Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:18:21 +0000

It is once again “the magic of urban renewal” paying for all manner of bling with no vote of the people. I would offer if MLB wants a new stadium (that is never full and near empty most of the season)they pay for it out of all the cash they raked in all season long. Otherwise, I think it prudent we help them find another town willing to go into hock.

By: Muck Raker

Muck Raker — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:21:48 +0000

On the Ch7 Morning News today, Mr. Petcash began a story about a possible new stadium with words to the effect of “Where the Boise Hawks will build their new stadium…”

It’s been my understanding that the Boise Hawks don’t plan to build anything but rather to have the taxpayers build a stadium from which the team can derive profits.

Is this not essentially correct?

By: bikeboy

bikeboy — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:00:09 +0000

I like Zippo’s notion of the “playas” being the Monks of the New Godless Society. (Although personally I’d just as soon attend a Gregorian Chanting Session as a baseball game. Too much spittin’ and scratchin’, and not enough action. And therefore I defer the financing of baseball to my fellow citizens who find it more compelling.)

I found the discount for “young leaders under age 35” to be interesting. Does that suggest a form of age discrimination? Maybe everybody over 35 should be turned into Soylent Green. And how does one get the “young leader” cred? Must you prove that you voted for Bieter’s hand-picked yuppie council people? So many questions.

By: Zippo

Zippo — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:56:36 +0000

Government is always so willing and eager to give my money to everyone but me. You’d think someday we might have a tea party again.

http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/11/14/your-tax-dollars-subsidizing-scottie-pippin-ted-turner-and-jon-bon-jovi

By: Zippo

Zippo — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:33:48 +0000

Sports! The new religion for a Godless people.

Baseball is not such a bad one, not near as much child molestation as other sports, but collections need to be optional, the players should take a vow of poverty, and all profits returned to the community.

By: ola

ola — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:30:10 +0000

Dave, you don’t appear impressed by the studies that predict a “home run”. I would like to see their study that estimates the amount of money not being spent on other economic activity that will be spent at the stadium for events. Usually people will choose to spend in one place or another, therefore for every extra dollar spent at the new shiny stadium, some other restaurant or service will realize less economic activity. For a short primer on baseball stadiums see video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1vynA-dfEo&feature=player_embedded

Sound familiar, economic benefit, lots of activity, shiny new stadium? Not with my taxpayer money.