Comments on: Now EVERYONE Wants To Sue Nampa

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 27 Dec 2011 03:22:23 +0000

Tom don’t you think that is a bit harsh. I agree the property taxes are way out of line compared to Ada County. Canyon County is and will remain primarily an agricultural enclave for a long long time.

Please don’t smear the current Prosecutor with predecessors of Mr. Brian Taylor. You won’t find a more ethical person.

I would also add that most county employees are honest and hard working people. The real issue here is our Commissioner’s failing to listen to or read external audit reports and heed the warnings.

By: Tom

Tom — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:53:23 +0000

The only word to describe Canyon County is “Debacle”, from their legal system, to the property tax, to the overly offensive smell, there is not one good working thing that comes from that “debacle” of a county.

By: Paul

Paul — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:38:02 +0000

Mayor Tom Dale has never missed an opportunity to take more taxes when the opportunity presents itself.

They can’t raise taxes due to the tax cap so now they are using Idaho enterprise fund law to screw with taxpayers of Nampa.

By: chicago sam

chicago sam — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:43:15 +0000

Nampa’s private legal team can be found in the background of much of Nampa’s troubles in my opinion. They wrote the contract with Bujak 2 or 3 times and didn’t have the cents to call county commissioners to see if what Bujak told city council was true. They received money and worked on the recent doggie deal with canyon county when members of committee were supposed to be all volunteer and now the storm water fiasco. How much simpler would it be to get an opinion from Attorney General rather than spend time in court. White-Peterson wins both ways–they wrote the ordinance and they get paid to defend it. What a crock of cranberrries–or something similiar. Oh yes, one of the partners is legal advisor for Nampa’s Urban Renewel Board