<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: House Panel Votes To Keep State Out Of Commercial Ventures	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2012/03/01/house-panel-votes-to-keep-state-out-of-commercial-ventures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/03/01/house-panel-votes-to-keep-state-out-of-commercial-ventures/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/03/01/house-panel-votes-to-keep-state-out-of-commercial-ventures/#comment-28161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=7942#comment-28161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think this is long overdue.  How can a small business hope to compete with govt. funded ownership of a business. Tax free, unlimited funds to do any and all improvements without concern for profitability. And finally, no consequences for squandering taxpayer dollars. 

The guy running a business has to fund his competition?  This is just nutty as is the proposition of letting local governments invest in the stock market with taxpayer dollars.  

We have a State Treasurer, and a LGIP (local government investment pool) to deal with idle excess funds of local city , county and state entities. The money is invested in short term and long term low risk bonds, T-bills and Certificates that will protect taxpayer dollars from excess risk. I just looked on Vanguard&#039;s info and about 20-25% of all the years from 1929 to present have been down years for investment returns. Equities may be a good long haul investment but you will also have to weather some severe downturns. I do not think that is good exposure for government dollars that may be needed in those down years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is long overdue.  How can a small business hope to compete with govt. funded ownership of a business. Tax free, unlimited funds to do any and all improvements without concern for profitability. And finally, no consequences for squandering taxpayer dollars. </p>
<p>The guy running a business has to fund his competition?  This is just nutty as is the proposition of letting local governments invest in the stock market with taxpayer dollars.  </p>
<p>We have a State Treasurer, and a LGIP (local government investment pool) to deal with idle excess funds of local city , county and state entities. The money is invested in short term and long term low risk bonds, T-bills and Certificates that will protect taxpayer dollars from excess risk. I just looked on Vanguard&#8217;s info and about 20-25% of all the years from 1929 to present have been down years for investment returns. Equities may be a good long haul investment but you will also have to weather some severe downturns. I do not think that is good exposure for government dollars that may be needed in those down years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
