<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AG Needs Permanent Canyon Corruption Office	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 10:59:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 10:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To the Editor:

Yes, your argument may be absolutely correct.  But, perhaps it is also inherently wrong!

Does any reasonable person believe that Bryan Taylor, the present CCPA, will prosecute himself and his cronies?  Hmmmmmmm?

So, what other alternatives are there for justice to be delivered?  Again, Bujak is far, far, from the only one culpable in this putrid debacle in Nampa and Canyon County.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the Editor:</p>
<p>Yes, your argument may be absolutely correct.  But, perhaps it is also inherently wrong!</p>
<p>Does any reasonable person believe that Bryan Taylor, the present CCPA, will prosecute himself and his cronies?  Hmmmmmmm?</p>
<p>So, what other alternatives are there for justice to be delivered?  Again, Bujak is far, far, from the only one culpable in this putrid debacle in Nampa and Canyon County.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30517</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, many others should be held criminally liable in Nampa, Canyon County, in the police forces, in the judiciary, and in the courts and clerks&#039; offices, among others.

There is too much of a &quot;scratch your back&quot; mentality among all of these corrupt law enforcement shills and minions.  They are all covering each others&#039; behinds.  And, the Idaho Attorney General, and others who should be investigating all of this suspicious and nefarious activity, do not seem to have any imagination and backbone with regard to these serious and insidious issues.

EDITOR NOTE--In defense of the AG, the local prosecutor holds the power.  The AG can only come in at the request of the county prosecutor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, many others should be held criminally liable in Nampa, Canyon County, in the police forces, in the judiciary, and in the courts and clerks&#8217; offices, among others.</p>
<p>There is too much of a &#8220;scratch your back&#8221; mentality among all of these corrupt law enforcement shills and minions.  They are all covering each others&#8217; behinds.  And, the Idaho Attorney General, and others who should be investigating all of this suspicious and nefarious activity, do not seem to have any imagination and backbone with regard to these serious and insidious issues.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;In defense of the AG, the local prosecutor holds the power.  The AG can only come in at the request of the county prosecutor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chicago sam		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30193</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chicago sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was actually Mr. Laugheed who in an e-mail suggested to Mr. Bujak that he set up a seperate bank account and not send the money thru the clerk&#039;s office. It is inconceivable that others in Mr. Bujak&#039;s office did not know what was going on. Why aren&#039;t they being held accountable too?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was actually Mr. Laugheed who in an e-mail suggested to Mr. Bujak that he set up a seperate bank account and not send the money thru the clerk&#8217;s office. It is inconceivable that others in Mr. Bujak&#8217;s office did not know what was going on. Why aren&#8217;t they being held accountable too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Treasure valley is corrupt		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Treasure valley is corrupt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t take a rocket scientist to see the corruption in the treasure valley prosecutors offices and law enforcement.  It is only a matter of time before their house of cards comes crashing down.  They have somehow managed to con the easily conable &quot;knowing&quot; public but God never misses a trick.  I can&#039;t wait for the dominos to start to fall.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to see the corruption in the treasure valley prosecutors offices and law enforcement.  It is only a matter of time before their house of cards comes crashing down.  They have somehow managed to con the easily conable &#8220;knowing&#8221; public but God never misses a trick.  I can&#8217;t wait for the dominos to start to fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronin		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[so if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it&#039;s probably a duck!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it&#8217;s probably a duck!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a March 15, 2010 letter to Bob Henry pursuant to Mr. Henry&#039;s public records request, Samuel Laugheed, from the CCPA, wrote, in reference to Bujak&#039;s and others&#039; scam:  &quot;We recognize that the arrangement is innovative, and that it runs counter to the way things are traditionally done.  We intend, however, under Mr. Bujak&#039;s direction, to render the Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney&#039;s Office the state-wide model for efficient, effective, and just prosecution-and that requires no small measure of innovation.&quot;

Hmmmmmmmmmmm.  Do I feel a lot of smoke going up my pantleg out of Laugheed&#039;s mouth?

I thought attorneys were required to be circumspect, truthful, and analytical?  Not??????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a March 15, 2010 letter to Bob Henry pursuant to Mr. Henry&#8217;s public records request, Samuel Laugheed, from the CCPA, wrote, in reference to Bujak&#8217;s and others&#8217; scam:  &#8220;We recognize that the arrangement is innovative, and that it runs counter to the way things are traditionally done.  We intend, however, under Mr. Bujak&#8217;s direction, to render the Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney&#8217;s Office the state-wide model for efficient, effective, and just prosecution-and that requires no small measure of innovation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmmmmmmmmmm.  Do I feel a lot of smoke going up my pantleg out of Laugheed&#8217;s mouth?</p>
<p>I thought attorneys were required to be circumspect, truthful, and analytical?  Not??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30137</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Editor note-- Un founded allegation deleted)
Further, when something stinks, there may be something corrupt around.

I just do not know, yet.  But, I am determined to find out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Editor note&#8211; Un founded allegation deleted)<br />
Further, when something stinks, there may be something corrupt around.</p>
<p>I just do not know, yet.  But, I am determined to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am having an enjoyable time reading the letter from James Martin at Moffat Thomas to Bujak&#039;s Chapter 7 Bankruptcy trustee and Matthew Christensen (posted on KBOI2.com).  You just cannot make this stuff up!!

And, the so-called &quot;salary bumps&quot; for a very substantial amount of the money that went into Bujak&#039;s pocket appears to represent some quite substantial &quot;raises&quot; for a small handful of the prosecutors in the CCPA&#039;s Nampa office.  

It certainly makes a reasonable person wonder:  Could these &quot;salary bumps&quot; be a disguised BRIBE to other attorneys and prosecutors or staff in the office to keep their mouths shut as to Bujak&#039;s activities, and perhaps also to prosecute wrongfully and often??

After all, take a look at the definition of BRIBERY and CORRUPTION in the Idaho Code under Title 18, Chapter 13, 18-352.  

&quot;If the shoe fits, wear it.&quot;  Or, &quot;if it looks like a pig, oinks like a pig, and smells like a pig, well...............&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having an enjoyable time reading the letter from James Martin at Moffat Thomas to Bujak&#8217;s Chapter 7 Bankruptcy trustee and Matthew Christensen (posted on KBOI2.com).  You just cannot make this stuff up!!</p>
<p>And, the so-called &#8220;salary bumps&#8221; for a very substantial amount of the money that went into Bujak&#8217;s pocket appears to represent some quite substantial &#8220;raises&#8221; for a small handful of the prosecutors in the CCPA&#8217;s Nampa office.  </p>
<p>It certainly makes a reasonable person wonder:  Could these &#8220;salary bumps&#8221; be a disguised BRIBE to other attorneys and prosecutors or staff in the office to keep their mouths shut as to Bujak&#8217;s activities, and perhaps also to prosecute wrongfully and often??</p>
<p>After all, take a look at the definition of BRIBERY and CORRUPTION in the Idaho Code under Title 18, Chapter 13, 18-352.  </p>
<p>&#8220;If the shoe fits, wear it.&#8221;  Or, &#8220;if it looks like a pig, oinks like a pig, and smells like a pig, well&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The statements being made by the feckless Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney&#039;s Office in a failed attempt to rationalize, conceal, and obfuscate the private/public contract dispute and controversy is laughable.  I nearly busted a gut reading Samuel Laugheed&#039;s letters and testimony regarding this scam.  He looks like a cat covering his poop now, and it really makes me chuckle.

After all, this silly dispute has now been resolved by the Idaho Supreme Court, which ruled that the contract is clearly a public one.  This, after an army of lawyers and other feckless numbskulls attempted to argue that it was a private contract.  Hmmmmmmm.

Is this not attempted concealment?  Or perhaps some form of obstruction of justice?  It may also comprise a &quot;pattern of racketeering&quot; under both Federal and Idaho racketeering statutes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statements being made by the feckless Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney&#8217;s Office in a failed attempt to rationalize, conceal, and obfuscate the private/public contract dispute and controversy is laughable.  I nearly busted a gut reading Samuel Laugheed&#8217;s letters and testimony regarding this scam.  He looks like a cat covering his poop now, and it really makes me chuckle.</p>
<p>After all, this silly dispute has now been resolved by the Idaho Supreme Court, which ruled that the contract is clearly a public one.  This, after an army of lawyers and other feckless numbskulls attempted to argue that it was a private contract.  Hmmmmmmm.</p>
<p>Is this not attempted concealment?  Or perhaps some form of obstruction of justice?  It may also comprise a &#8220;pattern of racketeering&#8221; under both Federal and Idaho racketeering statutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Citizen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/04/13/ag-needs-permanent-canyon-corruption-office/#comment-30117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8247#comment-30117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Nampa office of the Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney was largely the scene of the crime allegedly committed by Bujak.  The alleged crime directly involves the Nampa prosecution contract that Bujak wheedled out of the feckless City of Nampa officials, as well as the Canyon County officials.

So, it only makes sense to scrutinize the activities of the Nampa prosecution office, its management and supervisors, as well as the deputy prosecutors and other officials and other grunts that were there.

These included the present Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney.  And, the statistics posted on the CCPA website pretty much tell an interesting story, if you just take the time to analyze them.  There might appear to be issues of improprieties, misconduct, and criminal behavior, including obstruction of justice, racketeering, criminal violations of civil and constitutional rights, conspiracy to conceal, and other serious issues.

Stay tuned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nampa office of the Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney was largely the scene of the crime allegedly committed by Bujak.  The alleged crime directly involves the Nampa prosecution contract that Bujak wheedled out of the feckless City of Nampa officials, as well as the Canyon County officials.</p>
<p>So, it only makes sense to scrutinize the activities of the Nampa prosecution office, its management and supervisors, as well as the deputy prosecutors and other officials and other grunts that were there.</p>
<p>These included the present Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney.  And, the statistics posted on the CCPA website pretty much tell an interesting story, if you just take the time to analyze them.  There might appear to be issues of improprieties, misconduct, and criminal behavior, including obstruction of justice, racketeering, criminal violations of civil and constitutional rights, conspiracy to conceal, and other serious issues.</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
