<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supremes Say Cottage Lease Law Unconstitutional	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/#comment-33378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8622#comment-33378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why would the Legislature even try to interfere with market price pressures for the lake site leases?

In a Republican dominated state and a party philosophy of limited government these leases should go to the highest bidders.

I am also concerned about the Land Board getting into owning and leasing retail establishements.  No private citizen can compete with a tax free entity like government. On that same note churches should be taxed on everything but the actual church grounds and sanctuary. All the city, county and state services now get paid by taxpayers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the Legislature even try to interfere with market price pressures for the lake site leases?</p>
<p>In a Republican dominated state and a party philosophy of limited government these leases should go to the highest bidders.</p>
<p>I am also concerned about the Land Board getting into owning and leasing retail establishements.  No private citizen can compete with a tax free entity like government. On that same note churches should be taxed on everything but the actual church grounds and sanctuary. All the city, county and state services now get paid by taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clancy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/#comment-33331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clancy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8622#comment-33331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chicago Sam hit one nail on the head.  

The other consequence to this decision involves some endowment lands being utilized by the University of Idaho at the McCall Field Campus also known as MOSS(McCall Outdoor Science School).  As of 2011,  IDL owns the land.  What happens when that lease comes up for renewal?  Parks and Rec. were working on a land exchange to help UI out but I don&#039;t think that happened.  The proposed exchange was for IDPR&#039;s Vardis Fisher property that was just listed for sale in March 2012.

At one time IDL also owned Lakeview Village that IDPR recently expanded too.  I believe there was an land exchange so this property should not be affected.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago Sam hit one nail on the head.  </p>
<p>The other consequence to this decision involves some endowment lands being utilized by the University of Idaho at the McCall Field Campus also known as MOSS(McCall Outdoor Science School).  As of 2011,  IDL owns the land.  What happens when that lease comes up for renewal?  Parks and Rec. were working on a land exchange to help UI out but I don&#8217;t think that happened.  The proposed exchange was for IDPR&#8217;s Vardis Fisher property that was just listed for sale in March 2012.</p>
<p>At one time IDL also owned Lakeview Village that IDPR recently expanded too.  I believe there was an land exchange so this property should not be affected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Local		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/#comment-33324</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Local]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8622#comment-33324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There goes the nieghborhood - - again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There goes the nieghborhood &#8211; &#8211; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/#comment-33314</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8622#comment-33314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Really? The &quot;Supremes&quot;? Was Diana Ross there too??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? The &#8220;Supremes&#8221;? Was Diana Ross there too??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chicago sam		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/#comment-33312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chicago sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8622#comment-33312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my view State is shooting themselves in the foot by limiting leases to 10 years. Should be 50 or 100 years with provisions for reassesment of value every 5 years. The real value to school districts would be in the improvements and the taxes the county would levy. Leaseholders could build without fear of auction every 10 years and financing should be much easier to obtain. I would bet you would see a real building boom if leases were long term. Some will say grandpa and grandma built this--we are emotionally attached. tuff to give up entitlements isn&#039;t it! Of course the beuracracy in Boise might be smaller.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my view State is shooting themselves in the foot by limiting leases to 10 years. Should be 50 or 100 years with provisions for reassesment of value every 5 years. The real value to school districts would be in the improvements and the taxes the county would levy. Leaseholders could build without fear of auction every 10 years and financing should be much easier to obtain. I would bet you would see a real building boom if leases were long term. Some will say grandpa and grandma built this&#8211;we are emotionally attached. tuff to give up entitlements isn&#8217;t it! Of course the beuracracy in Boise might be smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zippo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/06/29/supremes-say-cottage-lease-law-unconstitutional/#comment-33306</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zippo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8622#comment-33306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder why DEQ/EPA allows the State of Idaho to lease the land so near the lakes for residential use.  The decades of human impact on those lakes is easy to see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why DEQ/EPA allows the State of Idaho to lease the land so near the lakes for residential use.  The decades of human impact on those lakes is easy to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
