<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ada P&#038;Z To Hold Special Dynamis Meeting	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/19/ada-pz-to-hold-special-dynamis-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/19/ada-pz-to-hold-special-dynamis-meeting/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LandfillUser		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/19/ada-pz-to-hold-special-dynamis-meeting/#comment-35408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LandfillUser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8983#comment-35408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regarding the two links provided by DO:  The wikipedia article is clearly pro-industry -- but the truth shall out shortly.  The second regarding Denmark is interesting, and here is the difference with Dynamis:

&quot;Far cleaner than conventional incinerators, this new type of plant converts local trash into heat and electricity. In the process, dozens of filters catch pollutants, from mercury to dioxin, that would have emerged from its smokestack only a decade ago.&quot;

Unfortunately, we won&#039;t be getting dozens of filters.  Nothing designed to capture mercury.  Nothing designed to capture dioxin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the two links provided by DO:  The wikipedia article is clearly pro-industry &#8212; but the truth shall out shortly.  The second regarding Denmark is interesting, and here is the difference with Dynamis:</p>
<p>&#8220;Far cleaner than conventional incinerators, this new type of plant converts local trash into heat and electricity. In the process, dozens of filters catch pollutants, from mercury to dioxin, that would have emerged from its smokestack only a decade ago.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, we won&#8217;t be getting dozens of filters.  Nothing designed to capture mercury.  Nothing designed to capture dioxin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DO		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/19/ada-pz-to-hold-special-dynamis-meeting/#comment-35334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8983#comment-35334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is a wikipedia article on trash to energy and mentions plants in Europe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste-to-energy_plant

Here is another article on the idea.
http://www.quantockeco.org.uk/case-studies/converting-garbage-into-clean-energy/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a wikipedia article on trash to energy and mentions plants in Europe. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste-to-energy_plant" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste-to-energy_plant</a></p>
<p>Here is another article on the idea.<br />
<a href="http://www.quantockeco.org.uk/case-studies/converting-garbage-into-clean-energy/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.quantockeco.org.uk/case-studies/converting-garbage-into-clean-energy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
