<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Procedural Moves May Out Maneuver Public On Dynamis Deal	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: modern columbo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[modern columbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Numerous emails have been sent by me to both Ted Argyle and Greg Bower pointing out the exact areas of law where this decision is lacking.  Neither of them has chosen to reply.  The resolution declaring this an industrial park was done in order to comply with the following regarding the lease:
TITLE 31 
COUNTIES AND COUNTY LAW CHAPTER 8 
POWERS AND DUTIES OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 31-836.
Read that section.  I don&#039;t think the declaration makes it fit thus the lease is illegal.  Amendment 772 made a lot of verbiage changes but significantly added a sentence to the land fill section declaring anything that reduces waste will be considered  ancillary.  Ted Argyle stated that Dynamis fits into the Ancillary definition.  A power plant is not ancillary and is specifically prohibited in that area by current zoning standards.  All these illegalities are going right through the prosecutors office with approval.  A small amount of research will show these actions are not supported by law, yet they are approved.  Something is truly wrong over at the Ada County prosecutors office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numerous emails have been sent by me to both Ted Argyle and Greg Bower pointing out the exact areas of law where this decision is lacking.  Neither of them has chosen to reply.  The resolution declaring this an industrial park was done in order to comply with the following regarding the lease:<br />
TITLE 31<br />
COUNTIES AND COUNTY LAW CHAPTER 8<br />
POWERS AND DUTIES OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 31-836.<br />
Read that section.  I don&#8217;t think the declaration makes it fit thus the lease is illegal.  Amendment 772 made a lot of verbiage changes but significantly added a sentence to the land fill section declaring anything that reduces waste will be considered  ancillary.  Ted Argyle stated that Dynamis fits into the Ancillary definition.  A power plant is not ancillary and is specifically prohibited in that area by current zoning standards.  All these illegalities are going right through the prosecutors office with approval.  A small amount of research will show these actions are not supported by law, yet they are approved.  Something is truly wrong over at the Ada County prosecutors office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kappa TA		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35407</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kappa TA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Amazing!

Yes, Greg Bower has an opponent, and I encourage you and everyone else concerned about Dynamis and Ada County to vote for him. He is Ron Twilegar and according to some some recent polls he is leading against Bower. Please research him before you dismiss him as a viable candidate who will work well, I think, with two new commissioners from whatever party. (All good candidates.)

This is WAR, folks. Even the commishes said today that we should take our Dynamis complaints up with their legal advisers. Let&#039;s follow their advice and do just that by electing a new Ada County prosecutor.

KTA-MERIDIAN]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing!</p>
<p>Yes, Greg Bower has an opponent, and I encourage you and everyone else concerned about Dynamis and Ada County to vote for him. He is Ron Twilegar and according to some some recent polls he is leading against Bower. Please research him before you dismiss him as a viable candidate who will work well, I think, with two new commissioners from whatever party. (All good candidates.)</p>
<p>This is WAR, folks. Even the commishes said today that we should take our Dynamis complaints up with their legal advisers. Let&#8217;s follow their advice and do just that by electing a new Ada County prosecutor.</p>
<p>KTA-MERIDIAN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: My Two Cents		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My Two Cents]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Where is this so-called investigator and the investigation that was supposed to be happening?

Someone should contact 60 Minutes or a national program like that and tell them what is going on and get some real publicity that might stop these people in their tracks.  This is beyond outrageous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is this so-called investigator and the investigation that was supposed to be happening?</p>
<p>Someone should contact 60 Minutes or a national program like that and tell them what is going on and get some real publicity that might stop these people in their tracks.  This is beyond outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amazing!		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35389</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amazing!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is amazing how this is unfolding. It never stops. Can you imagine if we knew all the things Sharon and Rick have done? 

Is anyone running against Greg Bower? 

How are they going to find a county engineer that will approve Dynamis unless it is one from the Dynamis group? 

Is the Auditor on the ballot? Evidentally he has no internal control, authority or policies to watch such spending?

And the county manager/director is covering for them too. He is not on the ballot, but maybe the new commissioners can take a look at his job duties and authority. Looks like he won&#039;t be needed after the end of the year? 

Can Dynamis be put on the ballot? The citizens don&#039;t want it, but they do want the $2 million plus back. 

Be careful who you vote for!!!   
We&#039;ve had commissioners that were honest, had common sense and had  the citizens&#039; interests as their priority, so it can happen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is amazing how this is unfolding. It never stops. Can you imagine if we knew all the things Sharon and Rick have done? </p>
<p>Is anyone running against Greg Bower? </p>
<p>How are they going to find a county engineer that will approve Dynamis unless it is one from the Dynamis group? </p>
<p>Is the Auditor on the ballot? Evidentally he has no internal control, authority or policies to watch such spending?</p>
<p>And the county manager/director is covering for them too. He is not on the ballot, but maybe the new commissioners can take a look at his job duties and authority. Looks like he won&#8217;t be needed after the end of the year? </p>
<p>Can Dynamis be put on the ballot? The citizens don&#8217;t want it, but they do want the $2 million plus back. </p>
<p>Be careful who you vote for!!!<br />
We&#8217;ve had commissioners that were honest, had common sense and had  the citizens&#8217; interests as their priority, so it can happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zippo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zippo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Republican leaders:  It is mostly Republicans who are upset by this slight of hand.  We will hold all of you accountable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Republican leaders:  It is mostly Republicans who are upset by this slight of hand.  We will hold all of you accountable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clancy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clancy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like 772 may of turned into 797.  I didn&#039;t see the change in zoning. http://www.adaweb.net/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=RtAPxsiDs48%3D&#038;tabid=160

What I did find interesting is zoning requirements for power facilities, specifically Centralize Power Facilities.   It states &quot;minimum property size shall be forty (40) acres&quot;.  Also is says for Bio-Mass facilities, &quot;(2) Mass burn facilities shall not use waste containing hazardous materials as a fuel source.&quot;    

I think tires are hazardous materials.  I have to pay to dispose of them and they end up in a separate part of the landfill.  Also the Dynamis lease is much less than the 40 acres.   Am I wrong?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like 772 may of turned into 797.  I didn&#8217;t see the change in zoning. <a href="http://www.adaweb.net/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=RtAPxsiDs48%3D&#038;tabid=160" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.adaweb.net/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=RtAPxsiDs48%3D&#038;tabid=160</a></p>
<p>What I did find interesting is zoning requirements for power facilities, specifically Centralize Power Facilities.   It states &#8220;minimum property size shall be forty (40) acres&#8221;.  Also is says for Bio-Mass facilities, &#8220;(2) Mass burn facilities shall not use waste containing hazardous materials as a fuel source.&#8221;    </p>
<p>I think tires are hazardous materials.  I have to pay to dispose of them and they end up in a separate part of the landfill.  Also the Dynamis lease is much less than the 40 acres.   Am I wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clippityclop		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clippityclop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This whole business has become absolutely surreal.  I cannot believe the AG hasn&#039;t stepped in.  I&#039;ve always known the Commission was self-serving from the planned community days, but this is even more blatant.  I feel like I am watching a bad reality show.  Thank God it&#039;s an election year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole business has become absolutely surreal.  I cannot believe the AG hasn&#8217;t stepped in.  I&#8217;ve always known the Commission was self-serving from the planned community days, but this is even more blatant.  I feel like I am watching a bad reality show.  Thank God it&#8217;s an election year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kappa TA		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kappa TA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the Secretary of State can look into this. He seems to be the only state political leader paying attention to laws these days. 

I have to admit, sadly, that I&#039;m not one bit surprised by these tactical maneuvers by Ada County to circumvent the laws/and-or save face (exluding Commissioner Case.) I advocate for a new county prosecuting attorney ASAP to compensate for our loss of the county engineer.

Enough is Enough!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the Secretary of State can look into this. He seems to be the only state political leader paying attention to laws these days. </p>
<p>I have to admit, sadly, that I&#8217;m not one bit surprised by these tactical maneuvers by Ada County to circumvent the laws/and-or save face (exluding Commissioner Case.) I advocate for a new county prosecuting attorney ASAP to compensate for our loss of the county engineer.</p>
<p>Enough is Enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JamesBond		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesBond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, zoning ordinances are ordinances, and cannot be changed via resolution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, zoning ordinances are ordinances, and cannot be changed via resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clancy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/10/22/procedural-moves-may-out-maneuver-public-on-dynamis-deal/#comment-35378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clancy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=8995#comment-35378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This seems like a much faster railroad job than Bieter&#039;s trolley.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a much faster railroad job than Bieter&#8217;s trolley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
