<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Election 2012 Boils Down To Physics	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:04:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zippo		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zippo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The red people just need to be like OPEC and start charging huge for all the stuff shipped to the helpless over-educated blue people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The red people just need to be like OPEC and start charging huge for all the stuff shipped to the helpless over-educated blue people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is hard to believe that Romney lost when you look at this map.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to believe that Romney lost when you look at this map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dog		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good luck with the elitist thing JJ.  Democracy does not always work for your type.  Democracy presumes we are in this together.  You sound like a monarchist.

A lot of people who built the roads you drive on, built the house you live in, educated your children, treat you in a hospital, fight your wars, unplug your sewer, keep the internet going,  don&#039;t own realestate.  Think about it when you order some food at a restaurant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with the elitist thing JJ.  Democracy does not always work for your type.  Democracy presumes we are in this together.  You sound like a monarchist.</p>
<p>A lot of people who built the roads you drive on, built the house you live in, educated your children, treat you in a hospital, fight your wars, unplug your sewer, keep the internet going,  don&#8217;t own realestate.  Think about it when you order some food at a restaurant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JJ		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good question dog.  Going back to my first post, I would have to lean on the idea of net contributor since any one factor, such as being on food stamps, or subsidized federal lands is not enough to measure if one is a net contributor.

If only one variable were enough, then I wouldn&#039;t be able to vote (nor 100M other people) since I have a student loan that was subsidized by the Fed gov&#039;t and at one time an SBA subsidized small business loan.  However, despite those government programs I benefited from, my businesses pay a lot of taxes, my wages pay a lot of taxes, so I believe if you subtract what the government has given me in &quot;cash-incentives&quot; the cash I put back to the government through working is greater, hence I believe I am a net contributor.

If the farmer or rancher is not a net contributor, then they are no better than the bum who can work, but chooses not too and has been on food stamps for several years.

Despite what some posters might characterize me as a cold hearted elitist, I volunteer for a faith based employment agency that helps people with job searches.  I help them fill out applications, build a resume and do mock interviews.  Some are there because they really want a job and want to be productive.  Many come there because their church or NGO or government will give them more free benefits if they document an effort to get a job, but they really do not want a job.  I get huge satisfaction helping people find jobs and careers and an equal amount of anger at those who are able but do not try.

I concede it is controversial, my of many opinions and hard to distinguish between those who are contributors, those who need help now but will be future contributors, and those who do not want to be a contributor.  

While bikeboy did not opine, he puts forth the question, should those riding the train have the same influence as those puling the train?

I believe as a society those who are pulling the train have an ethical responsibility to help those just riding the train, but I do not think the riders should have an equal voice if they are not helping to pull the train or improving/preparing themselves to be in a position to help pull in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question dog.  Going back to my first post, I would have to lean on the idea of net contributor since any one factor, such as being on food stamps, or subsidized federal lands is not enough to measure if one is a net contributor.</p>
<p>If only one variable were enough, then I wouldn&#8217;t be able to vote (nor 100M other people) since I have a student loan that was subsidized by the Fed gov&#8217;t and at one time an SBA subsidized small business loan.  However, despite those government programs I benefited from, my businesses pay a lot of taxes, my wages pay a lot of taxes, so I believe if you subtract what the government has given me in &#8220;cash-incentives&#8221; the cash I put back to the government through working is greater, hence I believe I am a net contributor.</p>
<p>If the farmer or rancher is not a net contributor, then they are no better than the bum who can work, but chooses not too and has been on food stamps for several years.</p>
<p>Despite what some posters might characterize me as a cold hearted elitist, I volunteer for a faith based employment agency that helps people with job searches.  I help them fill out applications, build a resume and do mock interviews.  Some are there because they really want a job and want to be productive.  Many come there because their church or NGO or government will give them more free benefits if they document an effort to get a job, but they really do not want a job.  I get huge satisfaction helping people find jobs and careers and an equal amount of anger at those who are able but do not try.</p>
<p>I concede it is controversial, my of many opinions and hard to distinguish between those who are contributors, those who need help now but will be future contributors, and those who do not want to be a contributor.  </p>
<p>While bikeboy did not opine, he puts forth the question, should those riding the train have the same influence as those puling the train?</p>
<p>I believe as a society those who are pulling the train have an ethical responsibility to help those just riding the train, but I do not think the riders should have an equal voice if they are not helping to pull the train or improving/preparing themselves to be in a position to help pull in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dog		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[JJ, do you think all the farmers and ranchers that get subsidy payments and use public lands for practically free should not be able to vote?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ, do you think all the farmers and ranchers that get subsidy payments and use public lands for practically free should not be able to vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Don&#039;t Hate The Player		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36108</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don&#039;t Hate The Player]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brian,

Good question about why a retired senior citizen should pay for education and schools.  Here&#039;s a better one:  why should my children and I pay for Social Security *and* Medicare when we don&#039;t get any benefit from it?

Here&#039;s why:  because I truly believe we&#039;re all in this together.  The wages I make were definitely increased thanks to the education you helped provide--and I thank you for that.  In your retirement, hopefully the extra amount I&#039;m paying into Social Security and Medicare thanks to those higher wages is making your life better.

I&#039;m so tired of selfish people.  No one seems to be interested in the betterment of society as a whole anymore.  It&#039;s all about ME!

I shudder to think what future historians will write about our era...

EDITOR NOTE--Very nicely stated!  Average SS recipient (including the GUARDIAN editor) gets back everything they put in within a few short years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Good question about why a retired senior citizen should pay for education and schools.  Here&#8217;s a better one:  why should my children and I pay for Social Security *and* Medicare when we don&#8217;t get any benefit from it?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why:  because I truly believe we&#8217;re all in this together.  The wages I make were definitely increased thanks to the education you helped provide&#8211;and I thank you for that.  In your retirement, hopefully the extra amount I&#8217;m paying into Social Security and Medicare thanks to those higher wages is making your life better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so tired of selfish people.  No one seems to be interested in the betterment of society as a whole anymore.  It&#8217;s all about ME!</p>
<p>I shudder to think what future historians will write about our era&#8230;</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Very nicely stated!  Average SS recipient (including the GUARDIAN editor) gets back everything they put in within a few short years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bikeboy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36094</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bikeboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Human Nature:
- Those who have the gold, typically desire to keep their gold.  (A variation on the Golden Rule.)
- If one can have essentially the same lifestyle by either working or not working, for many people the not-working option is quite compelling.  (It&#039;s dangerous to incentivize idleness.)
- If one candidate seems more likely to continue the &quot;gravy train&quot; than the other candidate, the gravy-train candidate is more likely to get the votes of the people who are riding the gravy train.

When more people are riding the gravy train, than are pulling the gravy train, we&#039;ve got a serious situation.  It becomes much more likely to get bogged down.

Should the riders have the same influence as the pullers?  Tough question.  (And one that won&#039;t be resolved by the Boise Guardian Brain Trust, I&#039;m afraid.)

&quot;I&#039;m bikeboy, and I approve this message.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human Nature:<br />
&#8211; Those who have the gold, typically desire to keep their gold.  (A variation on the Golden Rule.)<br />
&#8211; If one can have essentially the same lifestyle by either working or not working, for many people the not-working option is quite compelling.  (It&#8217;s dangerous to incentivize idleness.)<br />
&#8211; If one candidate seems more likely to continue the &#8220;gravy train&#8221; than the other candidate, the gravy-train candidate is more likely to get the votes of the people who are riding the gravy train.</p>
<p>When more people are riding the gravy train, than are pulling the gravy train, we&#8217;ve got a serious situation.  It becomes much more likely to get bogged down.</p>
<p>Should the riders have the same influence as the pullers?  Tough question.  (And one that won&#8217;t be resolved by the Boise Guardian Brain Trust, I&#8217;m afraid.)</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m bikeboy, and I approve this message.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JJ		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I stand by my comment that only those who are contributors to society should be able to vote on how our society is run.  That principle does not discriminate based on economics.  You can be dirt poor, own no assets, but still working and contributing.

How &quot;contributor&quot; is defined is certainly a debate in itself.

Social assitance programs are meant to be a bridge to self-sufficiency.  Those who are mentally and physcialy able to work, but choose a life of perpetual social assistance instead I think have forfieted their right particpate in how our society is run and funded.  That right, in my opinion, is earned by being a contributor.

Determined----Yes Obamaphone is a 1985 program, in 2008 when Obama was elected about $700M federal dollars were funding the program.  Under Obama the program has essentially doubled it now costs us $1.6B.  Of the 12.5M particpants in the program, 3.5M are Tracfone subscribers, a company owned by the richest man in the world, (Carlos Slim and Family $69B)and a huge Obama fund raiser and donor.  I think most national  policitians (R or D) are dirty and when elected (R or D) they owe favors to the ultra-wealthy who bank-rolled their campaign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand by my comment that only those who are contributors to society should be able to vote on how our society is run.  That principle does not discriminate based on economics.  You can be dirt poor, own no assets, but still working and contributing.</p>
<p>How &#8220;contributor&#8221; is defined is certainly a debate in itself.</p>
<p>Social assitance programs are meant to be a bridge to self-sufficiency.  Those who are mentally and physcialy able to work, but choose a life of perpetual social assistance instead I think have forfieted their right particpate in how our society is run and funded.  That right, in my opinion, is earned by being a contributor.</p>
<p>Determined&#8212;-Yes Obamaphone is a 1985 program, in 2008 when Obama was elected about $700M federal dollars were funding the program.  Under Obama the program has essentially doubled it now costs us $1.6B.  Of the 12.5M particpants in the program, 3.5M are Tracfone subscribers, a company owned by the richest man in the world, (Carlos Slim and Family $69B)and a huge Obama fund raiser and donor.  I think most national  policitians (R or D) are dirty and when elected (R or D) they owe favors to the ultra-wealthy who bank-rolled their campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: boisecynic		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boisecynic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ah, the old renters don&#039;t pay property taxes fallacy. Hello, renters pay more property taxes. You all have heard of the homeowner&#039;s exemption, right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the old renters don&#8217;t pay property taxes fallacy. Hello, renters pay more property taxes. You all have heard of the homeowner&#8217;s exemption, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chicago sam		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2012/11/11/election-2012-boils-down-to-physics/#comment-36055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chicago sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=9131#comment-36055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Determined is obviously a self made man who has worked all of the tax loopholes to his advantage. Probably pretty tuff on his kids living in Palm Springs on food stamps after having such a successful role model. You wouldn&#039;t be the guy  the Gov is laughing at would you?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Determined is obviously a self made man who has worked all of the tax loopholes to his advantage. Probably pretty tuff on his kids living in Palm Springs on food stamps after having such a successful role model. You wouldn&#8217;t be the guy  the Gov is laughing at would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
