<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Opp Out Could Signal Land Policy Shift	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gonzales		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-82107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-82107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Again, I agree with you completely.  It is wonderful to exchange ideas with other interested readers.  Thank you very much. 

Also,  I obviously jumped the gun on falsely accusing the Curator, of censoring my posts.  Please understand my impatience, as my first entry was posted almost immediately.  Whereas subsequent posts were delayed for multiple days, leading me to believe that for some reason my postings had been objectionable to someone.  My apologies for this impatience.

EDITOR NOTE-- Myapologies for the delays.  I am in Tahiti and the wifi is cumbersome.  I also am unable to get several items posted, but will try to get them on the site soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I agree with you completely.  It is wonderful to exchange ideas with other interested readers.  Thank you very much. </p>
<p>Also,  I obviously jumped the gun on falsely accusing the Curator, of censoring my posts.  Please understand my impatience, as my first entry was posted almost immediately.  Whereas subsequent posts were delayed for multiple days, leading me to believe that for some reason my postings had been objectionable to someone.  My apologies for this impatience.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211; Myapologies for the delays.  I am in Tahiti and the wifi is cumbersome.  I also am unable to get several items posted, but will try to get them on the site soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard A Evensen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard A Evensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gonzales,

It is a pleasure to exchange thoughts in civil discourse. Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gonzales,</p>
<p>It is a pleasure to exchange thoughts in civil discourse. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Flyhead		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flyhead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am opposed to the IDL getting into businesses like the Affordable Storage Business and the Brew Pub in downtown Boise.  It is wrong and puts private operators at a competitive disadvantage.  Even the Gov. sees this as wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am opposed to the IDL getting into businesses like the Affordable Storage Business and the Brew Pub in downtown Boise.  It is wrong and puts private operators at a competitive disadvantage.  Even the Gov. sees this as wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard A Evensen		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81853</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard A Evensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Easterner: If I am the current lease holder, I already own the improvements. I would be offering you a premium for the lot you just purchased, or offering to sell you the improvements for a price you agree to.

There may be harsh and angry feeling to start with, but it seems level heads could prevail. The key is that the State is out of the process, and gets to simply sell the lot for full market value.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easterner: If I am the current lease holder, I already own the improvements. I would be offering you a premium for the lot you just purchased, or offering to sell you the improvements for a price you agree to.</p>
<p>There may be harsh and angry feeling to start with, but it seems level heads could prevail. The key is that the State is out of the process, and gets to simply sell the lot for full market value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gonzales		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81788</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard, 

Unfortunately , the curator does not want you to understand the facts of this matter.   Please contact the Guardian for details.  

Ironic that as a &quot;differentiated &quot;  vehicle - they behave remarkably like the SR and Statesman...... i.e. FULLY CAPTURED . 

Peace]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, </p>
<p>Unfortunately , the curator does not want you to understand the facts of this matter.   Please contact the Guardian for details.  </p>
<p>Ironic that as a &#8220;differentiated &#8221;  vehicle &#8211; they behave remarkably like the SR and Statesman&#8230;&#8230; i.e. FULLY CAPTURED . </p>
<p>Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gonzales		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard ,

The curator does not seem to like my replies , but has not told me why ...... Somehow doubt they will like this table either .

These 13 lots are ALL. IDL Payette  Waterfront lots and all were unleased at end of 2012 .....the final number is the IDL supplied 2013 appraisal value,  so to calculate an annual lease value multiply by 4%.   They all average  out at over $1,000,000 per lot. 



Count	Address #	Street Name	LEASE #	Existing Lot #	Prelim Subdivision                   (as appraised)	2013 assessed Value
1	3580	Warren Wagon RD	5003	D	Point of Rocks	1157870
2	2140	Payette DR	5010	37	Pinecrest	1076650
3	2238	Payette DR	5012	53	Cedar Knolls	1293750
4	1047	Plymouth RD	5014	10 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	588010
5	2016	Payette DR	5016	18	Pinecrest	1184790
6	2152	Payette DR	5025	38	Pinecrest	1068670
7	2043	HoneySuckle Way	5029	17 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	761380
8	2210	Payette DR	5045	46	Pinecrest	1318340
9	2107	Water Lily LN	5049	38 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	1127820
10	2097	John Alden RD	5060	33 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	747340
11	1952	Warren Wagon RD	5069	8	Pinecrest	1293270
12	980	Syringa Way	5074	15	Pinecrest	780760
13	2093	John Alden RD	5015	31 B1 	Pilgrim Cove A	894830
						
		TOTAL				13293480]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard ,</p>
<p>The curator does not seem to like my replies , but has not told me why &#8230;&#8230; Somehow doubt they will like this table either .</p>
<p>These 13 lots are ALL. IDL Payette  Waterfront lots and all were unleased at end of 2012 &#8230;..the final number is the IDL supplied 2013 appraisal value,  so to calculate an annual lease value multiply by 4%.   They all average  out at over $1,000,000 per lot. </p>
<p>Count	Address #	Street Name	LEASE #	Existing Lot #	Prelim Subdivision                   (as appraised)	2013 assessed Value<br />
1	3580	Warren Wagon RD	5003	D	Point of Rocks	1157870<br />
2	2140	Payette DR	5010	37	Pinecrest	1076650<br />
3	2238	Payette DR	5012	53	Cedar Knolls	1293750<br />
4	1047	Plymouth RD	5014	10 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	588010<br />
5	2016	Payette DR	5016	18	Pinecrest	1184790<br />
6	2152	Payette DR	5025	38	Pinecrest	1068670<br />
7	2043	HoneySuckle Way	5029	17 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	761380<br />
8	2210	Payette DR	5045	46	Pinecrest	1318340<br />
9	2107	Water Lily LN	5049	38 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	1127820<br />
10	2097	John Alden RD	5060	33 B1	Pilgrim Cove A	747340<br />
11	1952	Warren Wagon RD	5069	8	Pinecrest	1293270<br />
12	980	Syringa Way	5074	15	Pinecrest	780760<br />
13	2093	John Alden RD	5015	31 B1 	Pilgrim Cove A	894830</p>
<p>		TOTAL				13293480</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clancy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clancy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Grumpy,

Point of clarification.

I believe the state may of helped facilitate but did not pay for improvements.   The State did manage a community water system in Pilgrim Cove, but all monies paid by owners and lessees was held in a separate fund.  This has long been abandoned, since most cabins have gone to wells.
http://www.idl.idaho.gov/LandBoard/minutes/2008/may15_08finmin.pdf

The sewer system was started by the homeowners around Payette Lake and the state help with initial funding which was all paid back via the users.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grumpy,</p>
<p>Point of clarification.</p>
<p>I believe the state may of helped facilitate but did not pay for improvements.   The State did manage a community water system in Pilgrim Cove, but all monies paid by owners and lessees was held in a separate fund.  This has long been abandoned, since most cabins have gone to wells.<br />
<a href="http://www.idl.idaho.gov/LandBoard/minutes/2008/may15_08finmin.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.idl.idaho.gov/LandBoard/minutes/2008/may15_08finmin.pdf</a></p>
<p>The sewer system was started by the homeowners around Payette Lake and the state help with initial funding which was all paid back via the users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gonzales		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard,

We are NOT far off, but still I fear somewhat at cross purposes. 

Your first  point might be only a matter of semantics, very few people can afford a Bugatti automobile ,(small pool ) that does not mean it SHOULD be discounted so MORE can afford it.  Recall that when our hapless John Doe, decided to build his $2 million dollar house , which he can now enjoy year round , with room for his family and maybe some friends, on a leased lot,  the state encouraged him , mightily,  through the right of continuation  , which Wasden&#039;s Law struck down.  So, there is that issue to absorb. Bit of a bait and switch , you might say. Plus, John pays property taxes on whatever Ada County tells him it has for value.

There ARE at LEAST a dozen , I have a 
List I reverse engineered myself,  of waterfront lots sitting empty at Payette.    Some $15 million of value , if you believe the IDL&#039;s numbers , drawing NO income.   I am happy to provide the list to you for review.   i believe there are actually 15 but it is difficult to prove as IDL , for obvious reasons wants to hide this inventory. 

The abandoned &quot;upland&quot; lots you correctly reference are meaningless in the grand scheme of things , at 50 grand each , it takes 20 of them to equal 1 waterfront lot. There are 100 of them valued at 4.7 million.   But , I do agree that 
EVEN some of these $1,800 per year , to lease, lots have been abandoned.

Finally, do you think that IDL allows the property OWNER any say whatsoever in the selection of the appraiser ?   NOT on your life. IDL chooses  the appraiser - NOT the lessee.  Since the IDL selects the appraiser and gives them the USPAP  instructions HOW does the improvement owner magically get the value of his improvements jacked up ??  Quite the opposite is actually what happens again and again.  

Your last paragraph shows how close we actually are to being in agreement ...... YES please take ALL of the 12 lots on the waterfront out of mothballs , and auction them off , the state has destroyed the former cabins , so there is nothing there.  Prior to this recent December auction,  The last time they did this there were no bids that hit their $1 million minimum.... So they cancelled the auction.   Eventually,  they came back and did a REAL auction , NO minimum , and that lot ultimately sold for about $500,000, 
I believe it was around $ 4,800 per FF.   

So, there we are , in agreement , the state wants out , the AUCTION is a fair method ,  but before you go off stealing value from some innocent guy who had nothing but the purest intentions , why not see what the &quot;market&quot; tells us about the value of the  12 ALREADY vacant lots ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>We are NOT far off, but still I fear somewhat at cross purposes. </p>
<p>Your first  point might be only a matter of semantics, very few people can afford a Bugatti automobile ,(small pool ) that does not mean it SHOULD be discounted so MORE can afford it.  Recall that when our hapless John Doe, decided to build his $2 million dollar house , which he can now enjoy year round , with room for his family and maybe some friends, on a leased lot,  the state encouraged him , mightily,  through the right of continuation  , which Wasden&#8217;s Law struck down.  So, there is that issue to absorb. Bit of a bait and switch , you might say. Plus, John pays property taxes on whatever Ada County tells him it has for value.</p>
<p>There ARE at LEAST a dozen , I have a<br />
List I reverse engineered myself,  of waterfront lots sitting empty at Payette.    Some $15 million of value , if you believe the IDL&#8217;s numbers , drawing NO income.   I am happy to provide the list to you for review.   i believe there are actually 15 but it is difficult to prove as IDL , for obvious reasons wants to hide this inventory. </p>
<p>The abandoned &#8220;upland&#8221; lots you correctly reference are meaningless in the grand scheme of things , at 50 grand each , it takes 20 of them to equal 1 waterfront lot. There are 100 of them valued at 4.7 million.   But , I do agree that<br />
EVEN some of these $1,800 per year , to lease, lots have been abandoned.</p>
<p>Finally, do you think that IDL allows the property OWNER any say whatsoever in the selection of the appraiser ?   NOT on your life. IDL chooses  the appraiser &#8211; NOT the lessee.  Since the IDL selects the appraiser and gives them the USPAP  instructions HOW does the improvement owner magically get the value of his improvements jacked up ??  Quite the opposite is actually what happens again and again.  </p>
<p>Your last paragraph shows how close we actually are to being in agreement &#8230;&#8230; YES please take ALL of the 12 lots on the waterfront out of mothballs , and auction them off , the state has destroyed the former cabins , so there is nothing there.  Prior to this recent December auction,  The last time they did this there were no bids that hit their $1 million minimum&#8230;. So they cancelled the auction.   Eventually,  they came back and did a REAL auction , NO minimum , and that lot ultimately sold for about $500,000,<br />
I believe it was around $ 4,800 per FF.   </p>
<p>So, there we are , in agreement , the state wants out , the AUCTION is a fair method ,  but before you go off stealing value from some innocent guy who had nothing but the purest intentions , why not see what the &#8220;market&#8221; tells us about the value of the  12 ALREADY vacant lots ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Easterner		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81716</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Easterner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard I kinda like the sales idea you offer but, what if... 
Say you hold the lease.  
I buy the lot by winning bid.  

Now, you and I have to agree on a price of the building.  You have an incentive to have an outrageous high price.  There is nothing that holds you to agree to a reasonable sale price to me.  So you hold out.   At some point I say, &quot;okay how about if I sell you my land?&quot; -- at a premium profit for me, but still a huge discount to what you have had to pay to get lot and building. 
  
Denying use of property to someone???   That level of &quot;motivation&quot; borders on duress and both those points likely have problems in court.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard I kinda like the sales idea you offer but, what if&#8230;<br />
Say you hold the lease.<br />
I buy the lot by winning bid.  </p>
<p>Now, you and I have to agree on a price of the building.  You have an incentive to have an outrageous high price.  There is nothing that holds you to agree to a reasonable sale price to me.  So you hold out.   At some point I say, &#8220;okay how about if I sell you my land?&#8221; &#8212; at a premium profit for me, but still a huge discount to what you have had to pay to get lot and building. </p>
<p>Denying use of property to someone???   That level of &#8220;motivation&#8221; borders on duress and both those points likely have problems in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Grumpy ole guy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2014/02/09/land-board-deals-get-increased-scrutiny/#comment-81715</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grumpy ole guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=10782#comment-81715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The larger issue here is that the State removes from public use these lots and allows them to be reserved for single users for a specified period of time.  The State provides some improvements for these individuals for which all tax payers, pay.  So be it, I assume that, somehow, those costs are figured into the lease costs (but, I doubt it)  So long as there is public access, and public provided roads, boat ramps, picnic areas, camp grounds, there is, presumable, some amount of equality of public service available; so, therefore the tax-payers are being served on these public lands and water-ways.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The larger issue here is that the State removes from public use these lots and allows them to be reserved for single users for a specified period of time.  The State provides some improvements for these individuals for which all tax payers, pay.  So be it, I assume that, somehow, those costs are figured into the lease costs (but, I doubt it)  So long as there is public access, and public provided roads, boat ramps, picnic areas, camp grounds, there is, presumable, some amount of equality of public service available; so, therefore the tax-payers are being served on these public lands and water-ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
