<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: She&#8217;s Baaaack!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sneak Tax Attack		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneak Tax Attack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These commissioners are democrats and personal pension packers:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article56336985.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These commissioners are democrats and personal pension packers:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article56336985.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article56336985.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J Smith		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 04:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eagle Writer, 

You must have missed Trump being ridiculed and dismissed at every turn, but somehow creating so much populist support, by speaking clearly, that he has currently overcome the corporate media onslaught. The normal &quot;snake in the grass&quot; political double-speak isn&#039;t very popular this year.

You&#039;ve got it half right. We do get the person with the most support; corporate media support, which &quot;manufactures&quot; the support of the brainwashed citizens, and support of the rich folks who throw &#039;campaign parties&#039; where the big checks flow like water.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eagle Writer, </p>
<p>You must have missed Trump being ridiculed and dismissed at every turn, but somehow creating so much populist support, by speaking clearly, that he has currently overcome the corporate media onslaught. The normal &#8220;snake in the grass&#8221; political double-speak isn&#8217;t very popular this year.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got it half right. We do get the person with the most support; corporate media support, which &#8220;manufactures&#8221; the support of the brainwashed citizens, and support of the rich folks who throw &#8216;campaign parties&#8217; where the big checks flow like water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eagle Writer		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100829</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eagle Writer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[J Smith,

So by your standard Mr. Trump is leading because the media has determined him to be &quot;moderate, electable and level headed.&quot; Good to know.

The people do not &quot;get screwed&quot; in elections. We get the person with the most support. I have been involved with many winning campaigns and many losing campaigns. In none of them did the people get screwed - they got their choice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J Smith,</p>
<p>So by your standard Mr. Trump is leading because the media has determined him to be &#8220;moderate, electable and level headed.&#8221; Good to know.</p>
<p>The people do not &#8220;get screwed&#8221; in elections. We get the person with the most support. I have been involved with many winning campaigns and many losing campaigns. In none of them did the people get screwed &#8211; they got their choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aggrieved Party		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100827</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aggrieved Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In all fairness to the Commishes both past and present, they didn’t write the Dynamis contract.  The contract itself was so poorly worded that it left the door open for differing interpretations regarding the intent of the parties.  As a result of these inherent ambiguities, the perceived cost to pursue a judicial decision to clarify the rights and responsibilities of the parties was seen as too great a risk versus any reward possible. 

	Like any commission formed from the rank and file of everyday people, the BOCC relied on their counsel to protect taxpayer’s dollars by writing an iron clad contract.  Unfortunately, the Dynamis contract was not peer reviewed with an jaundiced eye towards the “what if a worst case scenario occurs”.   In hindsight, $2 million should have dictated at least an ounce of prevention (review) instead of the 2 million reasons to engage in finger pointing and CYA after the fact.  
 
	Being the political animals they aspire to be, I suspect the cost excuse for not pursuing bad Dynamis’ money wasn’t the real reason the BOCC dropped the Dynamis matter.  Political footballs are best dealt with by “calling the game” regardless of the air pressure between the ears of the Commishes.  “Calling the game” eliminated the vast majority of the possibility that this mess would continually be rearing its ugly head in the media going forward. 
 
	Did the strategy work?  To the largest degree…yes.  But only until those who were shackled with the blame reappear and bring the matter back into the public spotlight once again. 
 
	Besides, the interim loan from the County’s own investment account can always be slipped into the “B” budget for the next year under some innocuous heading and no one would be the was the wiser.  Or maybe the 2 million was simply transferred from the Commishes “bad decisions” slush fund.  Either way the Dynamis Dollars “only” wasted less than 1% of the annual County budget. 

	It never ceases to amaze me that outside counsel with a broader opinion base is not brought in by the BOCC until it comes time to for damage control.

	Two examples of this is the fact is that the fallout from Dynamis continues in the form of a complaint from Hidden Hollow Energy.  The costs of defense continues to rob taxpayers to defend against HHE’s claims of breach etc. with no end in sight?

	Add in just a touch of true hubris and political “pay-back” and you have the wrongful dismissal suit of Rich Wright. (Courtesy of the first official act of Mssrs. Case and Tibbs after their canonization in 2013).  The Supreme Court will rule on the Wright case someday and you can bet your bottom taxpayer dollar that the cost to settle or fight will be laid at the feet of all of us to pay…again. 
 
	Perhaps this can all be explained by the axiom that the “Collective intelligence of any group decision is inversely proportional to the number of members in the group”.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness to the Commishes both past and present, they didn’t write the Dynamis contract.  The contract itself was so poorly worded that it left the door open for differing interpretations regarding the intent of the parties.  As a result of these inherent ambiguities, the perceived cost to pursue a judicial decision to clarify the rights and responsibilities of the parties was seen as too great a risk versus any reward possible. </p>
<p>	Like any commission formed from the rank and file of everyday people, the BOCC relied on their counsel to protect taxpayer’s dollars by writing an iron clad contract.  Unfortunately, the Dynamis contract was not peer reviewed with an jaundiced eye towards the “what if a worst case scenario occurs”.   In hindsight, $2 million should have dictated at least an ounce of prevention (review) instead of the 2 million reasons to engage in finger pointing and CYA after the fact.  </p>
<p>	Being the political animals they aspire to be, I suspect the cost excuse for not pursuing bad Dynamis’ money wasn’t the real reason the BOCC dropped the Dynamis matter.  Political footballs are best dealt with by “calling the game” regardless of the air pressure between the ears of the Commishes.  “Calling the game” eliminated the vast majority of the possibility that this mess would continually be rearing its ugly head in the media going forward. </p>
<p>	Did the strategy work?  To the largest degree…yes.  But only until those who were shackled with the blame reappear and bring the matter back into the public spotlight once again. </p>
<p>	Besides, the interim loan from the County’s own investment account can always be slipped into the “B” budget for the next year under some innocuous heading and no one would be the was the wiser.  Or maybe the 2 million was simply transferred from the Commishes “bad decisions” slush fund.  Either way the Dynamis Dollars “only” wasted less than 1% of the annual County budget. </p>
<p>	It never ceases to amaze me that outside counsel with a broader opinion base is not brought in by the BOCC until it comes time to for damage control.</p>
<p>	Two examples of this is the fact is that the fallout from Dynamis continues in the form of a complaint from Hidden Hollow Energy.  The costs of defense continues to rob taxpayers to defend against HHE’s claims of breach etc. with no end in sight?</p>
<p>	Add in just a touch of true hubris and political “pay-back” and you have the wrongful dismissal suit of Rich Wright. (Courtesy of the first official act of Mssrs. Case and Tibbs after their canonization in 2013).  The Supreme Court will rule on the Wright case someday and you can bet your bottom taxpayer dollar that the cost to settle or fight will be laid at the feet of all of us to pay…again. </p>
<p>	Perhaps this can all be explained by the axiom that the “Collective intelligence of any group decision is inversely proportional to the number of members in the group”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Timm!		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timm!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Was she the commish who threw a fit because her name wasn&#039;t on the dedication plaque for the east Parkcenter bridge?

EDITOR NOTE--No.  That was ACHD, not county commish.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was she the commish who threw a fit because her name wasn&#8217;t on the dedication plaque for the east Parkcenter bridge?</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;No.  That was ACHD, not county commish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J Smith		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100824</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 04:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The people will elect who their TV and the Idaho Mistakesman tell them to elect. (Lapdog corporate media owned by the rich few who call the shots) Who ever the media deems &#039;moderate&#039;, &#039;electable&#039;, &#039;level-headed&#039; and gets lots of airtime will be crowned our new batch of Lords and Ladies. ...and the people will get screwed, again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people will elect who their TV and the Idaho Mistakesman tell them to elect. (Lapdog corporate media owned by the rich few who call the shots) Who ever the media deems &#8216;moderate&#8217;, &#8216;electable&#8217;, &#8216;level-headed&#8217; and gets lots of airtime will be crowned our new batch of Lords and Ladies. &#8230;and the people will get screwed, again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jj		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100801</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Glad she is back, hope she runs, makes for interesting headlines and cheaper than a ticket to the circus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad she is back, hope she runs, makes for interesting headlines and cheaper than a ticket to the circus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rabula		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100797</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rabula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That (my previous comment) said, with the Republicans&#039; love affair with the likes of The Donald, The Sharon—who manifests some of the same megalomaniacal qualities—could be a shoe-in. In this election cycle, all things are possible.

EDITOR NOTE--Not to worry.  TJ has a really well oiled cyber machine and Case has a powerful incumbent  backing.  Also, Tibbs turned down the &quot;nomination&quot; when Team Dave tried to make him their &quot;Boise guy&quot; on the BOCC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That (my previous comment) said, with the Republicans&#8217; love affair with the likes of The Donald, The Sharon—who manifests some of the same megalomaniacal qualities—could be a shoe-in. In this election cycle, all things are possible.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Not to worry.  TJ has a really well oiled cyber machine and Case has a powerful incumbent  backing.  Also, Tibbs turned down the &#8220;nomination&#8221; when Team Dave tried to make him their &#8220;Boise guy&#8221; on the BOCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rabula		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100796</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rabula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave,
 Has it occurred to you that rather than a heinous conspiracy being strong-armed by the mayor, &quot;Team Dave&quot; might actually be a group of elected officials who have a shared vision, which they have well articulated to a majority of voters who also share it? ...and that, by their own individual and collective intelligence they see the value of having a voice in other bodies of government that share their jurisdiction—i.e., ACHD, CCDC, Ada County, Idaho Legislature? It&#039;s not some nefarious, secret plot; it&#039;s how people elect representatives to try to gain local control over their own lives in a state system weighted to move power to the governor &#038; legislature.

In the long-run, it may prove more effective than armed and other forms of bullying.

EDITOR NOTE--Rabula, I gotta admit I never thought about things the way you describe them.  My readers and friends seem to always mention &quot;Chicago politics&quot; whenever we discuss the takeovers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
 Has it occurred to you that rather than a heinous conspiracy being strong-armed by the mayor, &#8220;Team Dave&#8221; might actually be a group of elected officials who have a shared vision, which they have well articulated to a majority of voters who also share it? &#8230;and that, by their own individual and collective intelligence they see the value of having a voice in other bodies of government that share their jurisdiction—i.e., ACHD, CCDC, Ada County, Idaho Legislature? It&#8217;s not some nefarious, secret plot; it&#8217;s how people elect representatives to try to gain local control over their own lives in a state system weighted to move power to the governor &amp; legislature.</p>
<p>In the long-run, it may prove more effective than armed and other forms of bullying.</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Rabula, I gotta admit I never thought about things the way you describe them.  My readers and friends seem to always mention &#8220;Chicago politics&#8221; whenever we discuss the takeovers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: erico49		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/01/13/shes-baaaack/#comment-100794</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[erico49]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12581#comment-100794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aggrieved--&quot;Allowing anyone to preside over a quarter billion dollars worth of public funds each year simply because they survive election year politics is not the best way to select our civic leaders.&quot; This is the way we elect ALL our leaders at all levels. You are correct, however, in this instance. The BOCC is a collection of overpaid micromanagers who do a lousy job. And The Guardian is right by referencing the state constitution. It can be changed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aggrieved&#8211;&#8220;Allowing anyone to preside over a quarter billion dollars worth of public funds each year simply because they survive election year politics is not the best way to select our civic leaders.&#8221; This is the way we elect ALL our leaders at all levels. You are correct, however, in this instance. The BOCC is a collection of overpaid micromanagers who do a lousy job. And The Guardian is right by referencing the state constitution. It can be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
