<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Flowers Bloom At Craters Monument	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2016/06/05/flowers-bloom-at-craters-monument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/06/05/flowers-bloom-at-craters-monument/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 22:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pāhoehoe		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/06/05/flowers-bloom-at-craters-monument/#comment-101530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pāhoehoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 22:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12888#comment-101530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Making it a national park causes huge visitor numbers, which the current infrastructure cannot handle.  We have a little gem which the world knows nothing about... let&#039;s keep it that way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making it a national park causes huge visitor numbers, which the current infrastructure cannot handle.  We have a little gem which the world knows nothing about&#8230; let&#8217;s keep it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rabula		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/06/05/flowers-bloom-at-craters-monument/#comment-101510</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rabula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12888#comment-101510</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We almost crossed paths, but canceled this year&#039;s trip to photograph those little desert miracles. 
We were at Craters a couple times for the 2010 bloom &#038; put together this little video of what we saw:
https://youtu.be/tyZJqO-luA8

Also photographed the Death Valley bloom two months earlier, April, 2010:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8j7J9oYm6k

EDITOR NOTE--Thanks for sharing.  Nice production.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We almost crossed paths, but canceled this year&#8217;s trip to photograph those little desert miracles.<br />
We were at Craters a couple times for the 2010 bloom &amp; put together this little video of what we saw:<br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/tyZJqO-luA8" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/tyZJqO-luA8</a></p>
<p>Also photographed the Death Valley bloom two months earlier, April, 2010:<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8j7J9oYm6k" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8j7J9oYm6k</a></p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Thanks for sharing.  Nice production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Easterne		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2016/06/05/flowers-bloom-at-craters-monument/#comment-101509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Easterne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=12888#comment-101509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Guardian, 
What do you think of the idea of Craters being a National Park?

EDITOR NOTE--Don&#039;t see much difference other than banning any grazing or hunting if that is now allowed.  IT would still be managed by the US Park Service and no bigger or better than it is at the present.  I would venture any effort toward PARK status is simply a matter of ego and political pressure.  We truly have a great state for scenic beauty, regardless of who designates what.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guardian,<br />
What do you think of the idea of Craters being a National Park?</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Don&#8217;t see much difference other than banning any grazing or hunting if that is now allowed.  IT would still be managed by the US Park Service and no bigger or better than it is at the present.  I would venture any effort toward PARK status is simply a matter of ego and political pressure.  We truly have a great state for scenic beauty, regardless of who designates what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
