<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Reader&#8217;s Argument Against Property Taxes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2018 03:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bullcrap		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bullcrap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2018 03:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Taxboy, no hate.  Just truth you don&#039;t like.  Libs throw out unfair and inappropriate labels hoping they stick when on losing end of discussion.

Yes, taxes really are forcing the elderly out of their homes in Boise.  Progressives call it progress.  Let us not forget the substantial taxes now applied (and regularly increased) on every kind of utility and city service.  For example, Trash+Water+Sewer now nearly equal to property tax bill.  Not a chance that stuff costs so much.  Pure profit to pay luxurious health plans for government employees whimpering about their difficult jobs.

Where the sun don&#039;t shine Taxboy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxboy, no hate.  Just truth you don&#8217;t like.  Libs throw out unfair and inappropriate labels hoping they stick when on losing end of discussion.</p>
<p>Yes, taxes really are forcing the elderly out of their homes in Boise.  Progressives call it progress.  Let us not forget the substantial taxes now applied (and regularly increased) on every kind of utility and city service.  For example, Trash+Water+Sewer now nearly equal to property tax bill.  Not a chance that stuff costs so much.  Pure profit to pay luxurious health plans for government employees whimpering about their difficult jobs.</p>
<p>Where the sun don&#8217;t shine Taxboy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sheldon of Idaho		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon of Idaho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2018 00:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gee, Bullcrap, I didn&#039;t think you would get THAT hateful. I forgot to add an eighth solution: run for office yourself, get elected, and change things.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, Bullcrap, I didn&#8217;t think you would get THAT hateful. I forgot to add an eighth solution: run for office yourself, get elected, and change things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Easterner		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Easterner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unless you ARE an attorney. 

Sheldon&#039;s point #6. ..you can go to court. But if we’re talking about residential values, the attorney costs of reducing your assessment will probably exceed the benefits.

That is not applicable when the property owner (or friend of) is an attorney. 
Such is the case with ACHD Commissioner Rebecca Arnold- license attorney with real estate experience. 
It was easy and zero cost for her to appeal an assessment, as was mentioned in the previous story of the private bridge being improved by tax dollars.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you ARE an attorney. </p>
<p>Sheldon&#8217;s point #6. ..you can go to court. But if we’re talking about residential values, the attorney costs of reducing your assessment will probably exceed the benefits.</p>
<p>That is not applicable when the property owner (or friend of) is an attorney.<br />
Such is the case with ACHD Commissioner Rebecca Arnold- license attorney with real estate experience.<br />
It was easy and zero cost for her to appeal an assessment, as was mentioned in the previous story of the private bridge being improved by tax dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bullcrap		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bullcrap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sheldon failed to mention property taxes taken by force are not spent in my neighborhood.  In fact they are benefiting areas I never go to.  Used to lobby for F-35 for example.  The terrible school system is probably the largest waste.  Schools are only in session half a year now with all the special school holidays, so schools not even a useful babysitting service anymore.  Kids are as stupid and helpless as never before.  Teachers still underpaid.  In short Sheldon there is no accountability for the money taken by force.  I have no control over how where when it is spent.

It will get worse and worse until we are indistinguishable from other high tax low service states/cities where government employees complain about their miserable overpaid careers of incompetence.  This is the stated goal of Bieter and the new girls running the county.  Fools can&#039;t even get the right picture on a driver’s licenses after over a year of trying.  Can’t get the ice off the roads before noon.  Hundreds of examples of not doing what they take the money to do.  Then the go on TV and explain how taking even more money will get it right next year.

If 50% of every single government agency, except perhaps police and emergency services, if 50% were fired today and the money given back to the taxpayer. We would be far better off within a few years after absorbing them into the private sector.  The growth of government in my lifetime has by far outpaced the need, and by far outpaced the growth of population, and by far outpaced the growth of GDP.  It is government growth for the government’s sake, taxpayer be damned.  Media is so dependent on government for advertising income they don&#039;t dare point out the truth of how government growth is crushing the life out of the ordinary taxpayer.  And Sheldon, you are clueless about how the tax increases are crushing older retired folks trying to remain in their homes.  Clueless!

Stick it where sun don’t shine taxboy!

https://taxfoundation.org/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheldon failed to mention property taxes taken by force are not spent in my neighborhood.  In fact they are benefiting areas I never go to.  Used to lobby for F-35 for example.  The terrible school system is probably the largest waste.  Schools are only in session half a year now with all the special school holidays, so schools not even a useful babysitting service anymore.  Kids are as stupid and helpless as never before.  Teachers still underpaid.  In short Sheldon there is no accountability for the money taken by force.  I have no control over how where when it is spent.</p>
<p>It will get worse and worse until we are indistinguishable from other high tax low service states/cities where government employees complain about their miserable overpaid careers of incompetence.  This is the stated goal of Bieter and the new girls running the county.  Fools can&#8217;t even get the right picture on a driver’s licenses after over a year of trying.  Can’t get the ice off the roads before noon.  Hundreds of examples of not doing what they take the money to do.  Then the go on TV and explain how taking even more money will get it right next year.</p>
<p>If 50% of every single government agency, except perhaps police and emergency services, if 50% were fired today and the money given back to the taxpayer. We would be far better off within a few years after absorbing them into the private sector.  The growth of government in my lifetime has by far outpaced the need, and by far outpaced the growth of population, and by far outpaced the growth of GDP.  It is government growth for the government’s sake, taxpayer be damned.  Media is so dependent on government for advertising income they don&#8217;t dare point out the truth of how government growth is crushing the life out of the ordinary taxpayer.  And Sheldon, you are clueless about how the tax increases are crushing older retired folks trying to remain in their homes.  Clueless!</p>
<p>Stick it where sun don’t shine taxboy!</p>
<p><a href="https://taxfoundation.org/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://taxfoundation.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sheldon of Idaho		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon of Idaho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I confess I worked at the State Tax Commission&#039;s property tax division for twelve long years. During that time, I came to appreciate property tax. Here&#039;s why:

1. Property taxes are LOCAL taxes. They don&#039;t get passed through the State legislature, or Washington D.C., they are collected locally and spent locally. And, for better or worse, they are based on a budget which is set locally. When budgets are set, you have the ability to get up and testify to your city council or county commissioners. You can probably even walk into their offices and pound your fist on their desks. Try that at the legislature or congress!

2. Many commenters have talked about how as property values rise, taxes rise. Not so: if everyone&#039;s property value (and assessment) rises at the same rate, and IF BUDGETS STAY THE SAME, property taxes would also stay the same. Of course, there are many exemptions that distort this picture, but many commenters are discussing BUDGET issues. And, in an effort to correct inequalities, there is a substantial homeowners&#039; exemption. Further, truly low-income seniors and disabled have the right to a &quot;circuit breaker&quot; exemption. If you deserve these exemptions, I sincerely hope you are claiming them.

3. Property taxes give the city, the county, the schools, and the highways a dependable source of revenue--as opposed to sales and income taxes. I&#039;m glad that the schools don&#039;t lay off teachers when the economy takes a downturn.

4. The worst part of property taxes is that they are collected in lump sums, for most people twice a year. That hurts, but it&#039;s certainly more transparent than constantly collected sales and gas and (withheld) income taxes. Painful, but transparent.

5. This country&#039;s biggest problem is not income inequality, it is WEALTH inequality. And the only tax on which the 1% pay their fair share, is property tax.


If you are unmoved by these arguments, take the following steps:

1. When you receive your assessment notice next May, go online and look at all the details on your own home: square footage, year built, etc. If they are correct, great.

2. At the same time, see what&#039;s happening in your neighborhood. You can look at everybody&#039;s data and assessed value. If your value seems in line with your neighbors&#039; values, at least things are probably fair.

3. If the data seems right, but the value seems high, call or visit your appraiser. His/her phone number is on the assessment notice. Maybe they need to visit your house and see how decrepit your joint is!

4. If you still aren&#039;t happy with the assessor&#039;s value, file an appeal. You can have your day in court with the county commissioners. But &quot;my value&#039;s too high&quot; is not a good argument; you need data.

5. You can even appeal the commissioners&#039; decision to the State Board of Tax Appeals. Check out their web site for more info.

6. Oh yeah, you can go to court. But if we&#039;re talking about residential values, the attorney costs of reducing your assessment will probably exceed the benefits.

7. Now we&#039;re at the good part: the BUDGETS of all the entities you pay taxes to. The city, the county, the highway district, the school district, the cemetery district, the mosquito abatement district--the list goes on and on. But they all have budget hearings, and they all must take testimony.
 

I hope you folks don&#039;t all hate me now. I&#039;m just trying to reduce your pain!!!!!!!!

EDITOR NOTE--Sheldon, many thanks for taking the time to educate us all.  Good perspective.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess I worked at the State Tax Commission&#8217;s property tax division for twelve long years. During that time, I came to appreciate property tax. Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1. Property taxes are LOCAL taxes. They don&#8217;t get passed through the State legislature, or Washington D.C., they are collected locally and spent locally. And, for better or worse, they are based on a budget which is set locally. When budgets are set, you have the ability to get up and testify to your city council or county commissioners. You can probably even walk into their offices and pound your fist on their desks. Try that at the legislature or congress!</p>
<p>2. Many commenters have talked about how as property values rise, taxes rise. Not so: if everyone&#8217;s property value (and assessment) rises at the same rate, and IF BUDGETS STAY THE SAME, property taxes would also stay the same. Of course, there are many exemptions that distort this picture, but many commenters are discussing BUDGET issues. And, in an effort to correct inequalities, there is a substantial homeowners&#8217; exemption. Further, truly low-income seniors and disabled have the right to a &#8220;circuit breaker&#8221; exemption. If you deserve these exemptions, I sincerely hope you are claiming them.</p>
<p>3. Property taxes give the city, the county, the schools, and the highways a dependable source of revenue&#8211;as opposed to sales and income taxes. I&#8217;m glad that the schools don&#8217;t lay off teachers when the economy takes a downturn.</p>
<p>4. The worst part of property taxes is that they are collected in lump sums, for most people twice a year. That hurts, but it&#8217;s certainly more transparent than constantly collected sales and gas and (withheld) income taxes. Painful, but transparent.</p>
<p>5. This country&#8217;s biggest problem is not income inequality, it is WEALTH inequality. And the only tax on which the 1% pay their fair share, is property tax.</p>
<p>If you are unmoved by these arguments, take the following steps:</p>
<p>1. When you receive your assessment notice next May, go online and look at all the details on your own home: square footage, year built, etc. If they are correct, great.</p>
<p>2. At the same time, see what&#8217;s happening in your neighborhood. You can look at everybody&#8217;s data and assessed value. If your value seems in line with your neighbors&#8217; values, at least things are probably fair.</p>
<p>3. If the data seems right, but the value seems high, call or visit your appraiser. His/her phone number is on the assessment notice. Maybe they need to visit your house and see how decrepit your joint is!</p>
<p>4. If you still aren&#8217;t happy with the assessor&#8217;s value, file an appeal. You can have your day in court with the county commissioners. But &#8220;my value&#8217;s too high&#8221; is not a good argument; you need data.</p>
<p>5. You can even appeal the commissioners&#8217; decision to the State Board of Tax Appeals. Check out their web site for more info.</p>
<p>6. Oh yeah, you can go to court. But if we&#8217;re talking about residential values, the attorney costs of reducing your assessment will probably exceed the benefits.</p>
<p>7. Now we&#8217;re at the good part: the BUDGETS of all the entities you pay taxes to. The city, the county, the highway district, the school district, the cemetery district, the mosquito abatement district&#8211;the list goes on and on. But they all have budget hearings, and they all must take testimony.</p>
<p>I hope you folks don&#8217;t all hate me now. I&#8217;m just trying to reduce your pain!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;Sheldon, many thanks for taking the time to educate us all.  Good perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yossarian_22		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yossarian_22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 22:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For me it&#039;s the unrestrained printing of money. How does money get created? There is only ONE way. It is LOANED into existence. Only banks have the power to print money, cash or virtual. When a bank makes a loan, it creates an account or places $$ into a current account. Principal is that amount. Interest is never created, but must be paid from existing principal. This creates a never ending cycle of absent money, except...that every bank is allowed to loan 10X for every dollar it has on deposit. This is called fractional reserve banking. This is also very inflationary. It signals to the market that there&#039;s more money around and so you can charge more and more for a product or service. Printing in this nation is astronomical. This is why housing, health care, education, cars and anything else that most people BORROW for has ridiculous prices. This ensures a deficit of ability to ever pay anything off in full. 

The shysters all know this. They endorse it. As long as lemmings continue to be &quot;credit worthy&quot; then it keeps going on and on. Taxes live and thrive and expand because more and more money exists to be taxed. 

People wounder why there are billionaires. Easy, because there are billions and trillions of dollars in existence. If the money supply were never allowed to expand beyond a set amount (like a gold std), then markets would have to price according to the medium that makes it work. Pennies would never be stepped over, they would be picked up and rarely dropped. 

I have two jobs. One is cleaning up a shopping mall here in Boise. I pick up tons of coins from pennies to quarters. Back in 1968, those coins would buy me a whole bunch of things at any store, with change coming back.

We need SOUND money and limited taxes for services we NEED.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it&#8217;s the unrestrained printing of money. How does money get created? There is only ONE way. It is LOANED into existence. Only banks have the power to print money, cash or virtual. When a bank makes a loan, it creates an account or places $$ into a current account. Principal is that amount. Interest is never created, but must be paid from existing principal. This creates a never ending cycle of absent money, except&#8230;that every bank is allowed to loan 10X for every dollar it has on deposit. This is called fractional reserve banking. This is also very inflationary. It signals to the market that there&#8217;s more money around and so you can charge more and more for a product or service. Printing in this nation is astronomical. This is why housing, health care, education, cars and anything else that most people BORROW for has ridiculous prices. This ensures a deficit of ability to ever pay anything off in full. </p>
<p>The shysters all know this. They endorse it. As long as lemmings continue to be &#8220;credit worthy&#8221; then it keeps going on and on. Taxes live and thrive and expand because more and more money exists to be taxed. </p>
<p>People wounder why there are billionaires. Easy, because there are billions and trillions of dollars in existence. If the money supply were never allowed to expand beyond a set amount (like a gold std), then markets would have to price according to the medium that makes it work. Pennies would never be stepped over, they would be picked up and rarely dropped. </p>
<p>I have two jobs. One is cleaning up a shopping mall here in Boise. I pick up tons of coins from pennies to quarters. Back in 1968, those coins would buy me a whole bunch of things at any store, with change coming back.</p>
<p>We need SOUND money and limited taxes for services we NEED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eliminating Elections is next		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105710</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliminating Elections is next]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 21:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lots of foolish passive people on here just now noticing their high taxes, after lifetime of voting the same people into office over and over.

It&#039;s not a dem / rep problem so much as it is a dem / rino problem.  I can&#039;t identify more than one state or federal rep who is not tax loving rino.

We did this to ourselves.  We better fix it soon because their next steps is eliminating elections.  Bieter already has eliminated debt elections.  No Joke people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of foolish passive people on here just now noticing their high taxes, after lifetime of voting the same people into office over and over.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a dem / rep problem so much as it is a dem / rino problem.  I can&#8217;t identify more than one state or federal rep who is not tax loving rino.</p>
<p>We did this to ourselves.  We better fix it soon because their next steps is eliminating elections.  Bieter already has eliminated debt elections.  No Joke people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: idaholc		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105708</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[idaholc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 16:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am 79 years old.  I purchased a modest home in NE Boise thirty years ago.  It will be paid off in two years.

At that time my mortgage payments will disappear.  However, I will still pay $400 per month in property taxes, $100 more than my total mortgage payments when I bought the house.

Bottom line:  I am being priced out of my home by having to pay for bloated City and County Government, Ball parks, an anachronistic library, a desire called streetcar and developmental subsidies.

The &quot;increased value of my home&quot; is meaningless.  If I have to sell out, where do I move?  Maybe I can sleep in the new library!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 79 years old.  I purchased a modest home in NE Boise thirty years ago.  It will be paid off in two years.</p>
<p>At that time my mortgage payments will disappear.  However, I will still pay $400 per month in property taxes, $100 more than my total mortgage payments when I bought the house.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  I am being priced out of my home by having to pay for bloated City and County Government, Ball parks, an anachronistic library, a desire called streetcar and developmental subsidies.</p>
<p>The &#8220;increased value of my home&#8221; is meaningless.  If I have to sell out, where do I move?  Maybe I can sleep in the new library!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. We all should look at our elected AS Public Workers CAUSE THEY ARE! Elected public workers are sworn in to work for the public, their constituents. Not out of state developers or other elected public servants! 

Growth always comes to the top of conversations and one has to wonder if both our elected and hired public workers are to blame. 

Foe example. Boise elected public workers decided to purchase the Lucky Dog bar for a police sub station. Over paid for sure. Meanwhile Boise&#039;s public owns property on the green belt that wasn&#039;t adequate for the BFD, we built a new training center in ADA County for them to train. Along with that property the public owns the new, under construction, no income, low income housing project across the street.

So elected public workers take  another property off of the tax role, WHICH MEANS PROPERTY OWNERS, THE PUBLIC, pays more property tax! So one has to ask what was learned from the Fire Bond fiasco by our elected public workers? The above action was NOT in the best interest of the Public. 

I mention this as Boise elected workers are holding open hearings to discuss run away property prices? And one has to wonder if both our elected and hired public workers are to blame.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. We all should look at our elected AS Public Workers CAUSE THEY ARE! Elected public workers are sworn in to work for the public, their constituents. Not out of state developers or other elected public servants! </p>
<p>Growth always comes to the top of conversations and one has to wonder if both our elected and hired public workers are to blame. </p>
<p>Foe example. Boise elected public workers decided to purchase the Lucky Dog bar for a police sub station. Over paid for sure. Meanwhile Boise&#8217;s public owns property on the green belt that wasn&#8217;t adequate for the BFD, we built a new training center in ADA County for them to train. Along with that property the public owns the new, under construction, no income, low income housing project across the street.</p>
<p>So elected public workers take  another property off of the tax role, WHICH MEANS PROPERTY OWNERS, THE PUBLIC, pays more property tax! So one has to ask what was learned from the Fire Bond fiasco by our elected public workers? The above action was NOT in the best interest of the Public. </p>
<p>I mention this as Boise elected workers are holding open hearings to discuss run away property prices? And one has to wonder if both our elected and hired public workers are to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ItsMyMoney		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2018/11/24/readers-argument-against-property-taxes/#comment-105692</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ItsMyMoney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 23:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15364#comment-105692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We ought to consider more effective tax solutions to limiting the size and growth of government.  Here are some key points to more effectively rein in property tax increases: 

Put forth a Proposition by way of ballot for all electors to consider the following.  The County – indeed the State – cannot increase any residential property tax any year by more than 5%, except by special election of 2/3 of the voters; regardless of any assessed value.  If that means lower mil levy rates upon which taxes are assessed, so be it. A single adjustment increase can be made upon sale on residential property, if owned by the same owner consecutively for at least 15 years. Such adjustment cannot exceed a 50% increase over the last year’s taxable assessment prior to the sale of property. 

No doubt in a boom economy with large speculative interests at play, there will need to occur mandatory resets of mil levy rates.  Yet, in a down economy when taxes must be raised in spite of economic conditions, there is an increase allowed up to 5%, and there is special election assignments to place such petition on the ballot.

We have become far too trusting of the empty idea that somehow government grows so that we can all benefit.  That’s a false narrative proven as such by any casual observation.  In Idaho, we are one of only 5 or 6 States that have such high gas tax.  Yet, our roads suffer continuously. We are paying very high bond rates for schools, yet our children are getting only at best a tepid “average” passing grade in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). And our bridges are literally falling down. Our sewers cannot handle the demands. The examples seem almost endless.

We need to take care of ourselves by being more responsible for the costs of growth in the Valley. Wherever there is new development, be that commercial, manufacturing, residential or multi-family, impact fees must  pay for the attending costs to support expanded infrastructure of police, fire, water, sewer and traffic.  Yet, we continually refuse in Ada County and Idaho Legislature to seriously consider impact fees. The retirees, the fixed income and the poor all are hurt by someone else’s greed and demands for more.  The government is US.  We need to step up and compel responsible funding from those responsible for costs and services.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We ought to consider more effective tax solutions to limiting the size and growth of government.  Here are some key points to more effectively rein in property tax increases: </p>
<p>Put forth a Proposition by way of ballot for all electors to consider the following.  The County – indeed the State – cannot increase any residential property tax any year by more than 5%, except by special election of 2/3 of the voters; regardless of any assessed value.  If that means lower mil levy rates upon which taxes are assessed, so be it. A single adjustment increase can be made upon sale on residential property, if owned by the same owner consecutively for at least 15 years. Such adjustment cannot exceed a 50% increase over the last year’s taxable assessment prior to the sale of property. </p>
<p>No doubt in a boom economy with large speculative interests at play, there will need to occur mandatory resets of mil levy rates.  Yet, in a down economy when taxes must be raised in spite of economic conditions, there is an increase allowed up to 5%, and there is special election assignments to place such petition on the ballot.</p>
<p>We have become far too trusting of the empty idea that somehow government grows so that we can all benefit.  That’s a false narrative proven as such by any casual observation.  In Idaho, we are one of only 5 or 6 States that have such high gas tax.  Yet, our roads suffer continuously. We are paying very high bond rates for schools, yet our children are getting only at best a tepid “average” passing grade in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). And our bridges are literally falling down. Our sewers cannot handle the demands. The examples seem almost endless.</p>
<p>We need to take care of ourselves by being more responsible for the costs of growth in the Valley. Wherever there is new development, be that commercial, manufacturing, residential or multi-family, impact fees must  pay for the attending costs to support expanded infrastructure of police, fire, water, sewer and traffic.  Yet, we continually refuse in Ada County and Idaho Legislature to seriously consider impact fees. The retirees, the fixed income and the poor all are hurt by someone else’s greed and demands for more.  The government is US.  We need to step up and compel responsible funding from those responsible for costs and services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
