<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: No Need For Urban Renewal On Vista	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 14:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Forced Air		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forced Air]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 14:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a long time resident of the Vista corridor area, I can stipulate that IF there were a properly functioning lending system for would-be business startups to actually begin exciting and useful ventures, there would be no need for any URDs. I am now convinced that these government takeovers of commercial zones are caused by the lack of sufficient capital to the private sector for vibrant entrepreneurship to develop. By hamstringing small business with BS rules and saddling with enormous debts, the Stalinist city councils allow the blight to come forth, furnishing the excuse for the takeovers and then the Big Boyz $$ come in to turn the blight into downtown Portland whacko shops like the sicko Cock n Balls donut store (really...look it up). 

If you want an education about how real Free Markets are attacked and how Socialism in this nation took root, read Wayne Jett&#039;s Fruits of Graft.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long time resident of the Vista corridor area, I can stipulate that IF there were a properly functioning lending system for would-be business startups to actually begin exciting and useful ventures, there would be no need for any URDs. I am now convinced that these government takeovers of commercial zones are caused by the lack of sufficient capital to the private sector for vibrant entrepreneurship to develop. By hamstringing small business with BS rules and saddling with enormous debts, the Stalinist city councils allow the blight to come forth, furnishing the excuse for the takeovers and then the Big Boyz $$ come in to turn the blight into downtown Portland whacko shops like the sicko Cock n Balls donut store (really&#8230;look it up). </p>
<p>If you want an education about how real Free Markets are attacked and how Socialism in this nation took root, read Wayne Jett&#8217;s Fruits of Graft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: More of that group think		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106266</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More of that group think]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shouldn&#039;t some Superfund or EPA type agency deal with the tank farm?  Is there someone out there that knows the answer to such a massive pollution site?

EDITOR NOTE--It should be cleaned up and moved at expense of the owners and Boise taxpayers shouldn&#039;t have to own it.  You are correct about potential clean up site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t some Superfund or EPA type agency deal with the tank farm?  Is there someone out there that knows the answer to such a massive pollution site?</p>
<p>EDITOR NOTE&#8211;It should be cleaned up and moved at expense of the owners and Boise taxpayers shouldn&#8217;t have to own it.  You are correct about potential clean up site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric T		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They should take out the Vista corridor and focus on the area around the tank farm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should take out the Vista corridor and focus on the area around the tank farm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: More of that group think		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More of that group think]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BPD is reporting three people shot last night at the area of Palouse and Owyhee.  This is one of those dynamic problems.  

This is also the area of the middle of the night door ringer.  

What is happening at the neighbors?  Why does it continue to happen?  On. The. Bench.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BPD is reporting three people shot last night at the area of Palouse and Owyhee.  This is one of those dynamic problems.  </p>
<p>This is also the area of the middle of the night door ringer.  </p>
<p>What is happening at the neighbors?  Why does it continue to happen?  On. The. Bench.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boise Guy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boise Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It looks like the Boise Redevelopment Agency AKA CCDC is looking for a solution and then a problem.  The management of CCDC lives on a 20 year cycle.  After 20 years, they really need to find somewhere else to stay employed on the government dollar.  Build a baseball stadium for a 90 day team.  Get your names on the Brass Plaque.Instead of overbuilding like Northwest Boise is doing with hundreds (thousands) of new apartments, has anyone noticed that the Vista Neighborhood is full of single family owner occupied residences? The  American Dream since WWII.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the Boise Redevelopment Agency AKA CCDC is looking for a solution and then a problem.  The management of CCDC lives on a 20 year cycle.  After 20 years, they really need to find somewhere else to stay employed on the government dollar.  Build a baseball stadium for a 90 day team.  Get your names on the Brass Plaque.Instead of overbuilding like Northwest Boise is doing with hundreds (thousands) of new apartments, has anyone noticed that the Vista Neighborhood is full of single family owner occupied residences? The  American Dream since WWII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: More of that group think		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More of that group think]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First of all, I think people who have thought through the mechanics of URD&#039;s agree that tax money is diverted from other needs to prop up the needs of a developer to develop.  And then after paying back all the bond money, plus interest, that to continue, CCDC must do it again.  It is for the continuance of CCDC more than it is to eliminate blight or renew infrastructure.

Reasonable people would also agree that there is a definition of blight and that few areas of Boise continue to show blight.  It is a ruse to create these factual disputes and then make the pubic swallow.  

How about this.  The city with all of the resources that the taxpayers provide could sit down and listen to the people who live and work on the bench, and let us explain to them what type of problems we have.  Problems that are self-evident, and problems that are dynamic.  Self-evident:  lack of sidewalks, trash in yards, broken down vehicles, trailers, and yards that need cleaned up.  Also fresh vegetation, and shade, removal of illegal lean to&#039;s, shanty&#039;s and encroachments into setbacks.  Dynamic: speeding vehicles, badly marked roads, personalities that do not care or that have given up trying to help the neighborhoods look better, smell better, and be safer.  Police for the theives and vandals, and that they show a presence.  Dispersing the sex offenders to other areas of town, too.   Maintained alleys.  These are the view of this writer.  Please offer bench experience if you will.  

And then what if, a pretty big what if, the city would say, &quot;Ok, we see it and we see the effects.  We are no longer going too agree to ignore it. 
These are the things we are going to address.&quot;  And then quit with the phony baloney of kindness and livability, and make some simple action plans, based on the input received, to solve problems.  And then the humbleness to admit that they have left so many things undone and been so complacent that they were a catalyst in the creation of these problems.  

But they are like defiant children.  The more you ask them not to do something, the tighter they cling to each other and want to do it.  What if they tried to gain favor with those on the bench instead of among their clique of sheep that go along to get along, and get recognition of popularity from their clique.  

Well that would be my essay on the failure to recognize what creates community.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I think people who have thought through the mechanics of URD&#8217;s agree that tax money is diverted from other needs to prop up the needs of a developer to develop.  And then after paying back all the bond money, plus interest, that to continue, CCDC must do it again.  It is for the continuance of CCDC more than it is to eliminate blight or renew infrastructure.</p>
<p>Reasonable people would also agree that there is a definition of blight and that few areas of Boise continue to show blight.  It is a ruse to create these factual disputes and then make the pubic swallow.  </p>
<p>How about this.  The city with all of the resources that the taxpayers provide could sit down and listen to the people who live and work on the bench, and let us explain to them what type of problems we have.  Problems that are self-evident, and problems that are dynamic.  Self-evident:  lack of sidewalks, trash in yards, broken down vehicles, trailers, and yards that need cleaned up.  Also fresh vegetation, and shade, removal of illegal lean to&#8217;s, shanty&#8217;s and encroachments into setbacks.  Dynamic: speeding vehicles, badly marked roads, personalities that do not care or that have given up trying to help the neighborhoods look better, smell better, and be safer.  Police for the theives and vandals, and that they show a presence.  Dispersing the sex offenders to other areas of town, too.   Maintained alleys.  These are the view of this writer.  Please offer bench experience if you will.  </p>
<p>And then what if, a pretty big what if, the city would say, &#8220;Ok, we see it and we see the effects.  We are no longer going too agree to ignore it.<br />
These are the things we are going to address.&#8221;  And then quit with the phony baloney of kindness and livability, and make some simple action plans, based on the input received, to solve problems.  And then the humbleness to admit that they have left so many things undone and been so complacent that they were a catalyst in the creation of these problems.  </p>
<p>But they are like defiant children.  The more you ask them not to do something, the tighter they cling to each other and want to do it.  What if they tried to gain favor with those on the bench instead of among their clique of sheep that go along to get along, and get recognition of popularity from their clique.  </p>
<p>Well that would be my essay on the failure to recognize what creates community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106244</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seems like our elected public servants, Dave Bieter and his Master Bieters work harder for those who might move to Boise than their constituents? Vista is one the few roads that is a direct route into the downtown core, has residences and businesses! There is a lot of traffic, out of townees and locals, on Vista and BPD can&#039;t even enforce the rules of the road? 
I find it interesting that Dave Bieter made a statement about getting the land swap with T&#038;L trucking for city property back on the tax role! A week after Dave&#039;s decision to purchase property from Maverick on the corner of Orchard and Franklin TAKING it OFF the tax role?? Couldn&#039;t Maverick sell the property to someone in the private sector? 
Property in the hands of government, non profits, schools and CCDC are off the TAX role.
One of the reasons ACHD wanted to raise fees could be based on less income from property taxes while still taking care of the roads around these properties, like the Lucky Dog!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like our elected public servants, Dave Bieter and his Master Bieters work harder for those who might move to Boise than their constituents? Vista is one the few roads that is a direct route into the downtown core, has residences and businesses! There is a lot of traffic, out of townees and locals, on Vista and BPD can&#8217;t even enforce the rules of the road?<br />
I find it interesting that Dave Bieter made a statement about getting the land swap with T&amp;L trucking for city property back on the tax role! A week after Dave&#8217;s decision to purchase property from Maverick on the corner of Orchard and Franklin TAKING it OFF the tax role?? Couldn&#8217;t Maverick sell the property to someone in the private sector?<br />
Property in the hands of government, non profits, schools and CCDC are off the TAX role.<br />
One of the reasons ACHD wanted to raise fees could be based on less income from property taxes while still taking care of the roads around these properties, like the Lucky Dog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tad		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There definitely needs to be more housing for low income families, and that includes the elderly. Stop catering to people that keep flocking here from out of state. The cost of living is outrageous, because people here know that these out of state people have tons of money. We can&#039;t keep businesses here as it is, but we just keep on building. There&#039;s so many empty commercial properties as is. Use those and quit building more and new crap!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There definitely needs to be more housing for low income families, and that includes the elderly. Stop catering to people that keep flocking here from out of state. The cost of living is outrageous, because people here know that these out of state people have tons of money. We can&#8217;t keep businesses here as it is, but we just keep on building. There&#8217;s so many empty commercial properties as is. Use those and quit building more and new crap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Easterner		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Easterner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2019 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good one, Guardian! 


To the point of earlier -- the URD bill that passed is not the answer.  The legislature should have put a stop to URDs all together. To pass a bill that simply modifies the money use, is to &#039;effectively agree&#039; with the concept- even though barely a few of the supporters of that bill would agree with URDs in general.   

Vista and The Bench is in whatever &#039;decreased&#039; condition due to the city using too much tax base in downtown while ignoring the rest of the city. 
Downtown has replaced perfectly good sidewalks with fresh bricks, while routes to schools in the Vista area have NO sidewalks. 


The money has been misused in downtown at the expense of other areas.  
The ULI report should&#039;ve been title &quot;URDs have Failed the Rest of the City&quot;  (and maybe even downtown too, given the overcrowdedness and animosity of some toward DT).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one, Guardian! </p>
<p>To the point of earlier &#8212; the URD bill that passed is not the answer.  The legislature should have put a stop to URDs all together. To pass a bill that simply modifies the money use, is to &#8216;effectively agree&#8217; with the concept- even though barely a few of the supporters of that bill would agree with URDs in general.   </p>
<p>Vista and The Bench is in whatever &#8216;decreased&#8217; condition due to the city using too much tax base in downtown while ignoring the rest of the city.<br />
Downtown has replaced perfectly good sidewalks with fresh bricks, while routes to schools in the Vista area have NO sidewalks. </p>
<p>The money has been misused in downtown at the expense of other areas.<br />
The ULI report should&#8217;ve been title &#8220;URDs have Failed the Rest of the City&#8221;  (and maybe even downtown too, given the overcrowdedness and animosity of some toward DT).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eamonn Harter		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/04/13/no-need-for-urban-renewal-on-vista/#comment-106241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eamonn Harter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2019 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15625#comment-106241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What pet project does Team Dave want to tax increment finance in this neighborhood, pray tell?  Perhaps a monorail from the airport direct to City Hall?  Suprise us, Mr. Bieter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What pet project does Team Dave want to tax increment finance in this neighborhood, pray tell?  Perhaps a monorail from the airport direct to City Hall?  Suprise us, Mr. Bieter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
