<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Reader Comments On Bieter Statements	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/</link>
	<description>A different slant on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Forced Air		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-107014</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forced Air]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-107014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since 2004 there are needles on the street showing up here and there. People poop in dumpster pens. I know, one of my 3 jobs is to pick up trash off the ground and I see them.

Homelessness is the result of a sicko monetary policy and &quot;easy credit&quot; debt plots that create UNAFFORDABLE housing. The same with health care and transportation and education. 

Look at California. Bieter&#039;s policies are chasing the very same path that progressives have in their big cities. Look at the homelessness, the crime, the trash, the needles, the poop, the crazy politicians, the total failure of the entire state. They have spent billions on a high speed rail that can&#039;t even show 1 foot of track yet. Is THIS what you want for Boise? 

We can do much better for much less. 

He wants us to look at downtown and see all the fancy storefronts and say &quot;wowie zowie...ain&#039;t that neat.&quot; Well, back in the 60s, downtown was a hopping place with way more stores to visit and more people working for much better pay. That&#039;s what I want back. Not smoke and mirrors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2004 there are needles on the street showing up here and there. People poop in dumpster pens. I know, one of my 3 jobs is to pick up trash off the ground and I see them.</p>
<p>Homelessness is the result of a sicko monetary policy and &#8220;easy credit&#8221; debt plots that create UNAFFORDABLE housing. The same with health care and transportation and education. </p>
<p>Look at California. Bieter&#8217;s policies are chasing the very same path that progressives have in their big cities. Look at the homelessness, the crime, the trash, the needles, the poop, the crazy politicians, the total failure of the entire state. They have spent billions on a high speed rail that can&#8217;t even show 1 foot of track yet. Is THIS what you want for Boise? </p>
<p>We can do much better for much less. </p>
<p>He wants us to look at downtown and see all the fancy storefronts and say &#8220;wowie zowie&#8230;ain&#8217;t that neat.&#8221; Well, back in the 60s, downtown was a hopping place with way more stores to visit and more people working for much better pay. That&#8217;s what I want back. Not smoke and mirrors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Not Improvements		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106995</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not Improvements]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 04:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure how many of you have ever lived with common wall/floor/ceiling neighbors such as with apartments or town homes?  There is no privacy and never enough parking.  You can hear everything, smell their food and cigarettes, etc etc.  I don&#039;t know what kinda fool pays so much money to live like that, apparently there are many who do.  These places totally suck for the price and the realtors will never say so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how many of you have ever lived with common wall/floor/ceiling neighbors such as with apartments or town homes?  There is no privacy and never enough parking.  You can hear everything, smell their food and cigarettes, etc etc.  I don&#8217;t know what kinda fool pays so much money to live like that, apparently there are many who do.  These places totally suck for the price and the realtors will never say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bieter &#38; Prosperity		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106992</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bieter &#38; Prosperity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 23:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bieter has increased prosperity alright – for the developer class.  And the “Grow Our Housing” project will continue to do the same, as it will only marginally address affordability while posing as the reason for the city to approve upzoning, which the City’s current electorate appears to fully support.

Take 30 minutes of your time and get informed about what upzoning will do. Austin is a few years ahead of Boise in the zoning code rewrite. This film captures it perfectly.

Zoned Out – released on Sept. 2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qsYOurWEoSc]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bieter has increased prosperity alright – for the developer class.  And the “Grow Our Housing” project will continue to do the same, as it will only marginally address affordability while posing as the reason for the city to approve upzoning, which the City’s current electorate appears to fully support.</p>
<p>Take 30 minutes of your time and get informed about what upzoning will do. Austin is a few years ahead of Boise in the zoning code rewrite. This film captures it perfectly.</p>
<p>Zoned Out – released on Sept. 2</p>
<p><a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qsYOurWEoSc" rel="nofollow ugc">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qsYOurWEoSc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: But so. .		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106986</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[But so. .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 00:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What happened to the city&#039;s vacation balance fund?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the city&#8217;s vacation balance fund?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Easterner		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106984</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Easterner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 20:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Dave wins because____&quot;&quot;   WHY???

In typical political fashion Rebecca Arnold blames someone else. I imagine that will be her statement on Nov 6th too.  
Let&#039;s see the truth. In 2015 for example, some samples:

Precinct 1502 (Cloverdale/Chinden)
30% voter turnout and Bieter got 62%

Precinct 1602 (State St/Pierce Park)  
25% voter turnout and Bieter got 70%

Precinct 1707 (Cassia/Rose Hill) 
33% voter turnout &#038; Bieter got 74%

Precinct 1807 (Vista/Targhee)
32% voter turnout &#038; Bieter got 65% 

Precinct 1810 - SE Boise- unrelated to the North End and the above claim, 
35% voter turnout and Bieter got 73%
This counters the idea of Bieter&#039;s support is only in the North End. 

In the LOWEST turnout of 14% in Precinct 1512-- Bieter got 51%.
So the lowest turn-out actually produces the lowest Bieter support, (contrary to Arnold statement) but still a majority?   

In the FEW other Boise precincts with less than 20% turnout(1710 1711) Bieter scores in the 70% range. 
So, regardless of the turnout, Bieter support is consistent. 
Bieter had comparable results regardless of turnout or geography. I recall he narrowly lost 3 of 88 precincts.  I suspect this year will be similar if Bieter and McClean are viewed as &#039;alternates&#039;- the difference being the gender vote and the library.

\\\\
If someone donates $500 to the Guardian, I&#039;ll put the 2015 results in a matrix for the editor so the exact overall numbers can be posted. For another $500 donation, I would do it for the 2019 results- and then a comparison would show the impact of McClean and the library case.  Then we can geographically quantify some of the opinions floating around here. 

Although, since the Commissioner made the statement one would think she already has &#039;the evidence&#039;.  But in  modern Trumpian-style it&#039;s easier for politicians to make false statements and hope no one follows up, right? 

And guess what?  It&#039;s not voter turnout.  ;-)

Seems to me the problems listed above have more to do with the operations of ACHD and URDs and less to do with City Hall or how much a new library is going to cost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dave wins because____&#8221;&#8221;   WHY???</p>
<p>In typical political fashion Rebecca Arnold blames someone else. I imagine that will be her statement on Nov 6th too.<br />
Let&#8217;s see the truth. In 2015 for example, some samples:</p>
<p>Precinct 1502 (Cloverdale/Chinden)<br />
30% voter turnout and Bieter got 62%</p>
<p>Precinct 1602 (State St/Pierce Park)<br />
25% voter turnout and Bieter got 70%</p>
<p>Precinct 1707 (Cassia/Rose Hill)<br />
33% voter turnout &amp; Bieter got 74%</p>
<p>Precinct 1807 (Vista/Targhee)<br />
32% voter turnout &amp; Bieter got 65% </p>
<p>Precinct 1810 &#8211; SE Boise- unrelated to the North End and the above claim,<br />
35% voter turnout and Bieter got 73%<br />
This counters the idea of Bieter&#8217;s support is only in the North End. </p>
<p>In the LOWEST turnout of 14% in Precinct 1512&#8211; Bieter got 51%.<br />
So the lowest turn-out actually produces the lowest Bieter support, (contrary to Arnold statement) but still a majority?   </p>
<p>In the FEW other Boise precincts with less than 20% turnout(1710 1711) Bieter scores in the 70% range.<br />
So, regardless of the turnout, Bieter support is consistent.<br />
Bieter had comparable results regardless of turnout or geography. I recall he narrowly lost 3 of 88 precincts.  I suspect this year will be similar if Bieter and McClean are viewed as &#8216;alternates&#8217;- the difference being the gender vote and the library.</p>
<p>\\\\<br />
If someone donates $500 to the Guardian, I&#8217;ll put the 2015 results in a matrix for the editor so the exact overall numbers can be posted. For another $500 donation, I would do it for the 2019 results- and then a comparison would show the impact of McClean and the library case.  Then we can geographically quantify some of the opinions floating around here. </p>
<p>Although, since the Commissioner made the statement one would think she already has &#8216;the evidence&#8217;.  But in  modern Trumpian-style it&#8217;s easier for politicians to make false statements and hope no one follows up, right? </p>
<p>And guess what?  It&#8217;s not voter turnout.  😉</p>
<p>Seems to me the problems listed above have more to do with the operations of ACHD and URDs and less to do with City Hall or how much a new library is going to cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D vs. R		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D vs. R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey, Hey,  Let us open our eyes!

Is there any local politico who does not burn through millions faster than NASA?  No!  These people all carelessly smoke through money while claiming to not have enough.  What the hell it&#039;s free to them and spending it makes them powerful and popular with the uber powerful rich people.  If they play it right they can get a ride on AirForce One, and maybe even appointed a job by POTUS.

Dems vs. Reps is a marketing scam to make the average person think there are two teams.  Like the NFL or NASCAR makes you think there are several teams and divisions instead of the truth of just one big team with multiple uniforms.  Reps spend just as much and raise taxes just as much as Dems.  Affixing a Dem vs. Rep label is a common and successful distraction.  Reality is this is a Taxpayer vs. Tax spender battle and taxpayer is losing nearly every time.  Local and national, both teams, are taxing the shit out of us while giving free stuff to big businesses.  What was it ACHD wanted to attach to my little cars last year?  A subsidy to give free ride to locals trucks?  Does my registration tax keep going up up up?  How much does the mayor charge this month to flush a toilet?  Shameless, Dems and Reps both!  https://boiseguardian.com/2019/01/28/achd-leaves-vehicle-fee-on-lightweights/

The Mayor&#039;s administration:  What we are looking at here in Boise is the administration has been allowed to remain in office for so long they successfully set up a wheeling dealing syndicate.  Membership includes police departments, law firms, design &#038; engineering firms, politicos, courts, media, corporations, nonprofits, real estate moguls, etc. etc.  Membership includes Dems and Reps.  The mayor has become emperor of SW Idaho.  The mayor&#039;s race is for who gets to be the next emperor.  It should be a race about ending the syndicate.

I do agree that eligible voter apathy is the core problem.  Followed closely by INTENTIONAL lack of local coverage and FALSE news.

I have a dream.  I want to vote for someone who wants to shut the syndicate down and be a fiduciary for the taxpayer.  I don&#039;t see anyone, do you?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Hey,  Let us open our eyes!</p>
<p>Is there any local politico who does not burn through millions faster than NASA?  No!  These people all carelessly smoke through money while claiming to not have enough.  What the hell it&#8217;s free to them and spending it makes them powerful and popular with the uber powerful rich people.  If they play it right they can get a ride on AirForce One, and maybe even appointed a job by POTUS.</p>
<p>Dems vs. Reps is a marketing scam to make the average person think there are two teams.  Like the NFL or NASCAR makes you think there are several teams and divisions instead of the truth of just one big team with multiple uniforms.  Reps spend just as much and raise taxes just as much as Dems.  Affixing a Dem vs. Rep label is a common and successful distraction.  Reality is this is a Taxpayer vs. Tax spender battle and taxpayer is losing nearly every time.  Local and national, both teams, are taxing the shit out of us while giving free stuff to big businesses.  What was it ACHD wanted to attach to my little cars last year?  A subsidy to give free ride to locals trucks?  Does my registration tax keep going up up up?  How much does the mayor charge this month to flush a toilet?  Shameless, Dems and Reps both!  <a href="https://boiseguardian.com/2019/01/28/achd-leaves-vehicle-fee-on-lightweights/" rel="ugc">https://boiseguardian.com/2019/01/28/achd-leaves-vehicle-fee-on-lightweights/</a></p>
<p>The Mayor&#8217;s administration:  What we are looking at here in Boise is the administration has been allowed to remain in office for so long they successfully set up a wheeling dealing syndicate.  Membership includes police departments, law firms, design &amp; engineering firms, politicos, courts, media, corporations, nonprofits, real estate moguls, etc. etc.  Membership includes Dems and Reps.  The mayor has become emperor of SW Idaho.  The mayor&#8217;s race is for who gets to be the next emperor.  It should be a race about ending the syndicate.</p>
<p>I do agree that eligible voter apathy is the core problem.  Followed closely by INTENTIONAL lack of local coverage and FALSE news.</p>
<p>I have a dream.  I want to vote for someone who wants to shut the syndicate down and be a fiduciary for the taxpayer.  I don&#8217;t see anyone, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Kangas		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Kangas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 16:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Biter&#039;s reelection would  be a mandate to him, his policies and his spending. I didn&#039;t think Boise needed any improvement from 2004, I liked it then, still like it, but prices, traffic, congestion everywhere are becoming a concern.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biter&#8217;s reelection would  be a mandate to him, his policies and his spending. I didn&#8217;t think Boise needed any improvement from 2004, I liked it then, still like it, but prices, traffic, congestion everywhere are becoming a concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Idaho gal		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106981</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idaho gal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 16:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No, I’m not better off than 2004. As a matter of fact, those supposed jobs? Never found them and had to move out of state to pay the bills. My girlfriends who are college educated single moms are also struggling to make ends meet with no solid employment options.
How about taxing all those out of staters who came and bought up 2-3 houses and put them on airbnb? Do what Vancouver and Toronto are doing and put a huge tax on empty “investment” housing. I guarantee we will see housing become available quickly or there will be more tax revenue that doesn’t come from individual homeowners such as myself. I miss home, my amazing neighborhood and friends but every time I see boise mentioned in another “best place” list I have a mix of anger and sadness. One can have smart growth and terrible growth. So far I see only the latter. I want to come home but I have to bring my job with me because I cannot rely on any elected official to actually think about what would benefit us, the voters and citizens. Bieter had a vision but I think it was lost somewhere along the way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I’m not better off than 2004. As a matter of fact, those supposed jobs? Never found them and had to move out of state to pay the bills. My girlfriends who are college educated single moms are also struggling to make ends meet with no solid employment options.<br />
How about taxing all those out of staters who came and bought up 2-3 houses and put them on airbnb? Do what Vancouver and Toronto are doing and put a huge tax on empty “investment” housing. I guarantee we will see housing become available quickly or there will be more tax revenue that doesn’t come from individual homeowners such as myself. I miss home, my amazing neighborhood and friends but every time I see boise mentioned in another “best place” list I have a mix of anger and sadness. One can have smart growth and terrible growth. So far I see only the latter. I want to come home but I have to bring my job with me because I cannot rely on any elected official to actually think about what would benefit us, the voters and citizens. Bieter had a vision but I think it was lost somewhere along the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bieter begone		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bieter begone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The price tag on the trolley WAS $125 million back a few years ago.  Now it would be closer to $175 million to replicate the FREE BSU shuttle.

Elaine Clegg is big on this too. Course she’s in lockstep with Bieter so she needs to be dumped to the curb. 

Vote Debbie Lombard Bloom. 

PS TOm Lorentz.  Bieter is a democrat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price tag on the trolley WAS $125 million back a few years ago.  Now it would be closer to $175 million to replicate the FREE BSU shuttle.</p>
<p>Elaine Clegg is big on this too. Course she’s in lockstep with Bieter so she needs to be dumped to the curb. </p>
<p>Vote Debbie Lombard Bloom. </p>
<p>PS TOm Lorentz.  Bieter is a democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Western guy		</title>
		<link>https://boiseguardian.com/2019/10/06/reader-comments-on-bieter-statements/#comment-106979</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Western guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 03:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://boiseguardian.com/?p=15989#comment-106979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Go back through the mayor race campaign archives:  in his second (I think) campaign he promised ‘stronger neighborhoods’. Where are these stronger neighborhoods. Many are overrun with apartments... more traffic, parking on the streets, no nearby services. 

There is no code enforcement... period. Trashy houses are everywhere. Residents are expected to rat on their neighbors.

Try calling many City Hall offices:  menu prompts like you won’t believe, and voice mail. Where are all these new positions that have been added?  Maybe they are all planners and program managers, who don’t answer phones. Good luck finding a direct phone number!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go back through the mayor race campaign archives:  in his second (I think) campaign he promised ‘stronger neighborhoods’. Where are these stronger neighborhoods. Many are overrun with apartments&#8230; more traffic, parking on the streets, no nearby services. </p>
<p>There is no code enforcement&#8230; period. Trashy houses are everywhere. Residents are expected to rat on their neighbors.</p>
<p>Try calling many City Hall offices:  menu prompts like you won’t believe, and voice mail. Where are all these new positions that have been added?  Maybe they are all planners and program managers, who don’t answer phones. Good luck finding a direct phone number!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
