Frequent GUARDIAN contributor and avid environmentalist BIKEBOY solicits a free plug for bikes, along with a slight jab on behalf of growthophobes.
I’d like to encourage all Guardian family/friends to participate in Boise Bike Week,
May 14-19. (It’ll be here sooner than you think!)
More info: Boise Bike Week
I’m a bit mystified by the “Grand Finale” event sponsor – AVIMOR! Does SunCor
envision a large segment of their population swinging a leg over the ten-speed and
crankin’ it into downtown Boise? (That’s probably close to 20 miles; I’m thinking
most Avimor cyclists will stick to the Avimor sidewalks.)
We can ALL agree that traffic is one of the main challenges we face in our growing
community. Many of us would agree that more pavement is NOT the answer. (Has it
fixed the problem anyplace else?) Perhaps some of us see alternative modes of
transportation as a component of a long-term solution.
Bicycling has been MY preferred transportation (right here in Boise!) for 20+ years.
If you don’t want to wait for a better bus system, or for the Coles/Lyman Memorial
Choo-Choo, squirt some 3-in-one Oil on that bike chain, and join me! $4 gas? Who
cares?!!
For ongoing transportation-cycling commentary and discussion, I’d invite interested
Guardian readers to check out my Bike Nazi blog.
Thank ya. Thank ya verruh much.
To insure more advertising-free Boise Guardian news, please consider financial support.
May 1, 2007, 5:07 pm
Avimor’s parent company Sun Cor sponsors an annual mountain bike race on their land. You can check it out at Knobbytireseries.com. (Coyote Classic). While I don’t think much of the concept of Avimor, if they are willing to commit some cash to bike events isn’t that a good thing?
May 1, 2007, 7:01 pm
Kudo’s to our cyclist friends and Razz’s to $4/gal gas and the internal wallet combustingengine. WATCH THE TRAFFIC,FELLOW BIKERS, WEAR A HELMET and enjoy the beautiful weather! I would like to see city sponsored programs that cater to bicyclists ( like sports,touring events and maybe awarding businesses that sell AFFORTDABLE BIKES AND GEAR financial breaks.) I’m a bit obese so I walk and use the bus but Americans are beginning to realize what an expensive behemoth the chromy auto is! Ain’t it great.
May 1, 2007, 8:32 pm
Personally, I don’ think gas is expensive enough yet. One of the lasting truths about America and Americans is the best way to get our attention is to hit us in the pocketbook. As gas gets more and more expensive, alternative forms of transportation start to look better and better.
More people will try and ride the bus and more people will learn how much it sucks in Boise, which means Valley Ride will have more and more incentive (of the financial sort) to improve service, routes and hours of operation. Developments that are 20+ miles from the metropolitan core become less and less appealing while higher density/smart growth style living gains appeal.
Eventually, everything comes down to money. Right now, it’s very profitable to build McMansions on farmland between Boise and Meridian and the people living there don’t find the added cost of living far from everything prohibitive, so they buy them. As these costs rise, expect interest to wane and alternatives to come to the fore. The biggest problem with cycles like these, is they’re slow to come about and, unfortunately, have to hit some sort of critical mass before sweeping change takes place.
My prediction: if gas prices continue in the trend they’ve been on, in 2 or 3 years we’ll be staring down the barrel of 5 bucks a gallon and THAT will get people’s attention.
May 1, 2007, 11:03 pm
Bikeboy, as someone who bikes to work almost daily, I support biking and facilities for bikers. It’s worth pointing out, however, that Avimor will have a very well-developed system for bikes, including lanes and trails. Were but the rest of the city built so thoughtfully for us! The ACHD considers us a nuisance.
I suspect Avimorians will mainly conserve trips internally with their bikes and, as more jobs and shopping goes into Avimor, they will make fewer auto trips out of the planned community. If the “unplanned communities” of Meridian, Kuna and Eagle had made such provisions for jobs, shopping and recreation, we probably wouldn’t have such a traffic mess – or demand for planned communities.
May 2, 2007, 3:01 pm
I’ve been quiet for a while but the road/car/gas/development thingy is one of my favorites.
First, people love their cars, it’s a fact. Second, we live in a mostly-free market economy. People get to choose where and how they want to live. This really isn’t such a bad thing, man, I don’t know why I call myself cynic.
Part of the problem is gas taxes. It’s per gallon burned and not per mile driven. It should be per mile driven, isn’t this obvious? And peak demand hours should cost more than off peak.
oops, gotta go, but i’ll be back, oh, I’m coming for pizza, I’ll be the one complaining.
May 2, 2007, 4:27 pm
Bikeboy aka Bikenazi has great and entertaining articles at his blog. I too cycle everyday to work, but cannot compare to Bikeboy’s impressive statistics. As for the sponsor, get the money while you can.
Boisecynic- you are correct that miles driven would be more effective but harder to manage. Though there is still some correlation between gas consumption and miles driven. Taxing miles driven takes away some incentives for purchasing a fuel efficient or hybrid car.
May 3, 2007, 4:15 am
Boise Bike Week is a celebration of the cyclist. From recreational to commuter and even our illustrious race centric types. This is a community wide event that is geared to bring our cyclists closer to the general motoring public. Awarness of our cycling public only helps our motorized public to have more consideration toward cyclists of all types (recreational and environmental riders). The support of Suncor is a statement to the public that they believe cyclists our a positive addition to our wellbeing
as a community and environmentally. Kudos to Suncor and their support of Boise Bike Week!!
May 3, 2007, 9:05 am
Boisecynic said, “We live in a mostly-free market economy. People get to choose where and how they want to live. This really isn’t such a bad thing.”
I agree.
However, when we’re living together in a community, our choices tend to affect one another, like it or not. “No man is an island,” know what I mean?
If you choose to live in a spankin’ new house in a spankin’ new subdivision out off Ustick, and car-commute in to your downtown Boise job … you might be a small part of the reason those Ustick folks are losing their front yards.
If you live in Caldwell (where you don’t have to pay for that stupid worthless smog inspection!), and commute to Boise, you are contributing your share on those “yellow alert” bad air days, and impacting everyone in the community. Your contribution may be minimal, but combine it with 200,000 other minimal contributors, and it adds up. (Thank goodness I’m healthy, so I don’t have to quit breathing on the yellow-alert days!)
Anybody who transports by bicycle can feel pretty comfortable that their negative impact on friends and neighbors is nominal.
Boisecynic also declares that a “miles driven” tax would be better than a “gallons burned” tax.
I beg to differ.
As Clancy points out, there is at least a rough correlation between miles driven and gallons burned, even if a Prius goes 4-5 times as far (amazing!) on a gallon as a Hummer. There is also a rough correlation between gallons burned and the size and infrastructure-impact of the vehicle. Theoretically, fuel taxes are used to build and maintain roads. Our roads would need a lot more work if everybody in Treasure Valley drove a Ford Excursion, than if everybody drove a Geo Metro… know what I mean? (Which would have a bigger impact on the asphalt – one trip in a monster truck or five trips in a Prius? Hard to say.)
May 3, 2007, 9:33 am
And furthermore (grin)…
Wonk says, “I suspect Avimorians will mainly conserve trips internally with their bikes and, as more jobs and shopping goes into Avimor, they will make fewer auto trips out of the planned community.”
Maybe I’m just a pessimistic and cynical old goat, but I’ll be SHOCKED AND AWED if at least 90% of “Avimorians” (!!) don’t hop in their vehicles and head down Highway 55, at least 6 days a week.
I hope Wonk can say to me, 10 years from now, “Nee-ner, nee-ner, neeee-nerrrrr… see, I told you so!”
May 3, 2007, 11:50 am
Bikeboy: I really appreciate people like you who are doing what they can to reduce the number of cars on the road. I had to give up biking a long time ago when my sense of balance quit working with any amount of reliability, but I also hate to drive and try to do business with shops that are nearby whenever possible. My 15 year old “grannie-mobile” has about 55,000 miles on it. Until there is an actual mass transit system available that’s the best I can do to help.
May 4, 2007, 11:25 am
I cut my previous comment short because I had to run an errand. I think I even posted in the wrong place, I meant to post to the SV growth meet article. Oh well.
FWIW, I live downtown and ride my bike a lot. I drove only about 5000 miles last year, I have the emissions test paperwork to prove it.
Anyway, auto pollution and auto traffic are 2 separate issues. I am confident technology will solve a great deal of the pollution issues. More government incentives and disincentives may be necessary though. Technology can’t do much to solve the traffic issue. Gas tax revenue has been declining while miles driven has been rising.
Why? In spite of all the SUVs on the road, mpgs has increased. (yeah, give me a while and I’ll back these statements up). A Prius should not pay less taxes because it’s “greener” than an SUV, with respect to congestion. A car on the road is a car on the road, with minor consideration given to the length of the vehicle in regard to passenger vehicles. Trucks, semis and buses are a different story.
Part of the story that’s being left out is–we humans exist in large numbers, and if you’ve ever been to NY or LA, humans exist in very large numbers. They all gotta live somewhere. Back to the free market thingy, that’s what we have, don’t shoot the messenger here, I’m only stating a fact.
Not everyone wants to live in the central city. Should we mandate that? Communism and central planning have not proven to be very successful.
That leaves the question, what do we do about it, congestion and the apparent need for road building and widening that is. Well, read about central London’s congestion taxes. Read about the toll road construction in Orange County, CA.
Suburban flight has been about leaving the decaying inner city behind. People were/are sick of seeing rundown squalor and the criminal element that seems to be attracted to it. Therefore, if we’re going to mandate anything, it should be much stricter control of landlords and their upkeep of their properties.
May 4, 2007, 11:29 am
And another thing, bikeboy asked regarding traffic and more pavement “Has it fixed the problem anyplace else?”
So, I ask, has LACK of more pavement fixed the traffic/congestion problem anywhere else?
May 4, 2007, 2:38 pm
Cynic, Your expanded comments are much appreciated and put light to where you were headed before. Congestion is indeed a problem as I just came back from Orange County and made the rush hour drive on I-405(carpool lanes are a big plus). I hope New York passes their proposed congestion charge and gas prices rise dramatically, so people will think twice if this car trip is really nesseccary.
May 7, 2007, 9:30 am
I’m in favor of ANYTHING that will be a disincentive to single-occupant-vehicle commuting, and/or an incentive to alternatives.
Here’s an example of the problem. My employer leases 400 parking spaces in downtown street-level parking lots, for $60/month each. Then employees can rent a spot for $20/month. The other $40 is “absorbed.”
I suggested they eliminate the subsidy, give everybody a $480 raise, and let them choose whether to spend it on parking or something else. But that’s not practical, because the parking subsidy is “a tradition.” Huh?
(Regarding those folks who choose to live out in the [quickly-disappearing] “country” – as the catchy jingle on the farm-store commercial says, “There’s a price you pay, to get away… .” IMO, part of that “price you pay” is dealing with traffic when the city lights draw you back. There’s no guarantee that you’ll have an unimpeded expressway from your driveway to your office – that should be an important consideration when you’re deciding where to live.)