Business

State Retirement Funds For Energy?

We have a new GUARDIAN consultant who is a real doc and works on “gut issues” like internal medicine and renewable energy. Prior to working on humans, he worked for Idaho Fish and Game as a biologist. ( please excuse the format problem–using a foreign computer at the moment)

BY BOB McKIE, MD

Green energy projects have been proposed as a way to create jobs and reduce energy consumption. Unfortunately, deteriorating budgets at the national, state and local level limit the ability of governments to support these initiatives. Idaho has the ability to modestly facilitate green energy development by allowing state employees to voluntarily access retirement funds to make energy investments.

The State of Idaho should provide vested state employees with the option of taking one-time disbursements of retirement funds in order to make cost-effective renewable energy and energy efficiency upgrades.

In exchange for the disbursement, the employee will give up a share of retirement
benefits. The amount of the benefit reduction will be calculated by state accountants to be in proportion to the size of the disbursement.

If the program is a success, it could be expanded to other energy saving interventions like hybrid cars, energy efficiency upgrades, solar water heaters, solar panels and perhaps even small hydroelectric power plants on canals or existing dams. Technologies with clear track records like ground source heat pumps and stoves would be approved automatically, and other technologies would be approved once they prove that they can pay for themselves over a period of about 15 years. This would prevent unscrupulous dealers from selling ineffective products to well-meaning state employees. Several renewable energy technologies are cost-effective for home use.

Ground source (geothermal) heat pumps, wood stoves and pellet stoves can all displace oil, propane, natural gas and electricity from home heating. Ground source heat pumps can also heat water and cool buildings far more efficiently than conventional systems. According to the Department of Energy, ground source heat pumps can reduce electricity use in heating and air conditioning by 25-50% or more. These systems usually pay off in about 8-12 years. Unfortunately, energy upgrades require substantial up-front investments.

These energy investments would benefit everyone involved. State employees would have the right to take some of their retirement benefits to make energy upgrades that would immediately reduce their energy bills. This would lower retirement expenses and exposure to unstable energy prices. Work and tax revenue would be generated in the industries that build and install ground source heat pumps, wood stoves and pellet stoves. Work would also be created for wood cutters and wood pellet manufacturers. Pellet stoves can be modified to run on nut shells, fruit pits and other wastes. Only EPA certified stoves would be eligible for the disbursements, and areas like Boise with local air pollution problems would not be eligible for wood stove installation.

Idaho would experience other benefits. Idaho produces no propane, natural gas or oil, and is a net importer of electricity. Replacing these energy sources with local wood and geothermal power would keep money in Idaho. Displacing fossil fuels with wood and geothermal power will reduce Idaho’s carbon footprint. Ground source heat pumps reduce peak electricity use, which improves the function and reliability of the electric grid. Finally, local demand for renewable energy products will make Idaho a more attractive destination for the manufacturers of green technologies. This would not be a panacea for Idaho’s problems, but it would be a meaningful step in the direction of energy independence, natural resource conservation and economic recovery.

Comments & Discussion

Comments are closed for this post.

  1. Rod in SE Boise
    Feb 1, 2010, 9:38 pm

    Bob, when you use the term “retirement funds”, are we talking 401 (k) funds or otherwise? Some 401 (k)’s allow for loans of an employee’s 401 (k) money for home purchase or college tuition for the employee’s kids. The employee then pays himself back by making extra payments into the 401 (k). Such loans for renewable energy purposes sounds like a good idea.

  2. Spend now and hope for welfare money in retirement is never a good idea. Turn the heat down a bit and drive a little slower is the cheapest green you can have right now.

    The big AlGore hoax has finally been exposed and published by the “credible” media outlets that tried so hard for so long to propagate the unbelievable. Now that the crooks are hanging their pals out to dry, it will clear the way for real climate science. In a few years we’ll have real data that says the temperatures go up and down in numerous intermeshed cycles long and short and a bunch in between. We will hear about factors like instability of our orbit, changes of solar output, volcanic activity, and minor man made issues too. Most importantly, the focus can be on pollution and the worst polluters on the globe; who are also the same countries that we gave our best core jobs to by the way. Also the same countries who’ve been bankrolling the big lie and demanding immunity from the impending restrictions too.

  3. While I like the idea and think it could work in the private sector as well. I would have to question if now is the right time.

    PERSI has gone from being 113% over funded to 25% under funded in the past in less than ten years. Effective July 1, 2011, employee/employer contribution rates will increase by 5.31% over a 3 year period.

    PERSI is having problems paying out current retirees so more cash taken from the system could be disasterous at this time.

  4. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-flaws-peer-review

    EDITOR NOTE–This link is mostly old news and not part of THE Guardian in Boise we we all know and love.

  5. Dumbest idea I’ve seen this week. Ick! Encourage retirement investing on a dying horse (global warming alarm-ism). Brilliant.

    I doubt this could possibly happen in a 401K/503. A loan on a 401K to invest in green somethings. They can’t be serious.

    Then again, if you want to buy a green trolley for retirement… I’ll take the other side of the trade, once I figure out how to sell you one.

  6. So let me get this straight, you want a goverment employee to voluntarily decrease his/her retirement PENSION (not a 401K)for what ammounts to a 3-5% CD (one time pay out?)?

    Talk about short sighted.

  7. What I can’t seem to understand is why we aren’t seeing more Nuclear Power generation in this country. It seems to work in other parts of the world just fine. The numbers floating around for France is 90% Nuclear. It does not depend on the wind or sun, the fuels can now be reprocessed into new fuel.

    I will admit I know little about how much radioactive waste is generated and how it is currently dealt with but there are no greenhouse gases emitted by Nukes.

    The one reason I have heard about Nuclear Power generation in the USA going nowhere is funding is hard to obtain due to all the politics and unknown challenges not a problem elsewhere.

    Anyone out there have any solid info on this subject?

  8. Nuke: The French are dumping spent fuel in a very deep Atlantic trench. The Russians where dumping in the not so deep Baltic until someone noticed the tropical fish in the area. We are dumping, but don’t know where yet. We could sell it to China but they would sent it back to us in kids toys and chemical hand-warmers.

    I like Nuke too, but we need to buy a little island that wants the spent fuel. We had several but the Navy blew them up in the 1950’s.

Get the Guardian by email

Enter your email address:

Categories